Hannah Arendt wrote of modern existence as being that of worldlessness, in which individuals do not share a common world, have no shared system of meaning. When a person becomes aware of the freedom to act, to reach for another towards mutual understanding, they can help build a common world. This, to Arendt, is a secret, delightful, rare, most meaningful treasure. Likewise, it appears, for Papacharissi.
The idea of democracy confuses me and the path to understanding it overwhelms me. I appreciated After Democracy for listening to the ordinary, for letting me be as I am, for introducing me to others around the world who sit at the same ordinary table. Papacharissi pulls out a chair before sharing bad news (algorithmitized attention economy, numb(er)ed voices, empty signifiers), and she finds a way to share good news (we're about as civically engaged as our ancestors, playful reinventions of civic practice) without entering into cruel optimism.
The chapters include a bit of repetition, so best read over a few weeks alongside an evening cup of tea.
Quotes:
“Value, equality, and democracy are all flexible concepts, even though we often pretend they are not. They are everlasting because they are ever changing.”
“Lonely citizens are frequently forced to choose between yes and no, to approve or disapprove polling options; refusing to do so or selecting anything in between renders them invisible.”
“Politics does not have to be boring, yet the formulas we are taught for being political often reproduce routines that we no longer find rewarding. Indeed, the people I spoke with found inspiration in micro-activities in their communities, because that is where they were afforded the autonomy to be political in their own way. They were able to interact with others in lively and imaginative ways, and they felt the direct and fairly immediate impact of their actions. If we want lively citizens, we have to offer engaging opportunities of interaction.”