In Divided Waters , Ivan Musicant solidly presents Confederate and Union naval efforts, strategies, and technological developments during the Civil War. Organized by the various theaters of operations instead of chronologically, there are times where the events of one chapter seem odd in the context of the previous chapter, but this is a minor flaw. Probably the most interesting chapter is the all-too-short discussion of Union-Confederate conflicts on the high seas and around the world; it is very interesting to read about the delicate balancing acts that naval officers played in ports as far away as Brazil and France.
Musicant is at his best when describing battles and personalities. His accounts of the Alabama-Kearsarge engagement and the Battle of Mobile Bay are particularly vivid, and his characterizations of naval leaders are quite good. Musicant brings a good sense of how bloody and horrific some of the fighting was, especially between the Cumberland and the Merrimack.
Musicant also kind of belittles the Confederate navy. The Confederates placed in operation at one time or another more than 130 warships. Of this number approximately 25 were ironclads, not all "floating batteries," as he states, but rams as well. Although the ironclads did break down frequently (as did Union blockade vessels), they performed adequately in defense. He also understates some of the Confederates' accomplishments in naval construction. Despite problems in transporting raw materials to manufacturing facilities and a shortage of labor, their success was impressive. I doubt that the Confederacy ever had a real chance of beating the Union navy, but I feel that Musicant does not scrutinize this enough.
Another issue I had was the liberal use of hindsight that Musicant employed. He writes many times throughout the narrative that this disaster or that defeat could easily have been avoided if only this or that would have been done. It’s annoying, but not really that big of an issue.
I was also a little puzzled by the author's assertion that by the end of the war, the U.S. Navy had become "arguably the most powerful sea force in the world with a total of 670 ships." The number is impressive, but most of the ships were conversions from merchant ships, steamboats, ferries, etc. The ironclads were notoriously unseaworthy and often had to be towed.
This is a superior book in all regards. Great deeds by great men, deeds of derring-do and imbecility, steam punk engineering, high seas escapades, and of course, a wily outgunned and underarmed opponent who wouldn’t just give up. What’s not to like?
There are numerous one-volume naval histories of the American Civil War, but this one stands out. The author brings a level of Civil War geekery to the gruesomely proto-steampunk war on the water that other authors can't seem to muster. There's a deeper plumbing of sources and more telling anecdote here than elsewhere. Some passages needed stronger editing and a few more maps would have been welcome, but this is a highly worthwhile entry.
I have read so much history that I find myself looking for books that give a different point of view. I have read dozens of books on US Civil War history but have never read on written strictly on the naval side of the war. "Divided Waters" is just that. The author of the book covers every aspect of the naval war, but I was particularly interested in the river war as the rivers were the major routes of advance of the Federal forces in the west where the war was actually won. The author well covers the types of boats involved, the types of sailors who manned them, the weapons used and the campaigns they fought in. "Divided Waters" is an excellent book on an interesting subject and I enjoyed it immensely.
While the land battles of the Civil War have been covered in great detail, this is one of the few books to deal solely with the naval battles of the War. This book goes beyond the blockade that most know about from school to also delve into the battles that took place on the rivers during the war.
This book provided a lot of interesting details that I never knew - like the Union's decision to maintain unity of effort and use the Navy to maintain the blockade no matter what and the Confederate's naval presence in Europe as part of their effort to get financial, political, and logistical support. This book also did a good job of illustrating the impact new technologies can make in warfare (ironclads which were nearly unstoppable), the innovation in technology and tactics forced upon the combatants due to wartime demands, and the problems created by having the wrong mix of forces for the conflict at hand (e.g. too many "blue water" ships instead of the "brown water" ships needed to patrol close to shore and fight in rivers). Ultimately, I rated this book as a 3 rather than a 4 due to the writing. It wasn't bad. But the prose got a bit dense in places. An editor should have also done another pass for issues like detailing who a person was after he'd already been mentioned several times.