Celebrate re-publication of this Pulitzer Prize-winning author's first book.
Best known for Pilgrim at Tinker Creek, her Pulitzer Prize-winning narrative on nature and eternity, Annie Dillard writes fiction and nonfiction, as well as poetry, that explore abstract and sensory phenomena, the role of the artist in society and the creative process. The poems gathered in Tickets for a Prayer Wheel, first published in 1974, show us that the concerns of the author have not changed since she was in her twenties. Hers is a poetry of fact ― of science and nature, eternity and time, and how we know what we know. Often commended for their precise imagery, these poems speak of the love between people, storytelling and poetry's form.
Annie Dillard (born April 30, 1945) is an American author, best known for her narrative prose in both fiction and non-fiction. She has published works of poetry, essays, prose, and literary criticism, as well as two novels and one memoir. Her 1974 work Pilgrim at Tinker Creek won the 1975 Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction. Dillard taught for 21 years in the English department of Wesleyan University, in Middletown, Connecticut.
One of my favorite books of poetry. She looks at poetry and people in a deep but whimsical manner. I feel like if I sat with her poems for dinner, we'd be laughing and talking late into the night about literature and philosophy and muskrats and constellations and God. I love how she embraces nature, animals, trees, and yet without cliche. Some poems are surreal, some absurdist, some lyrical nature odes and some are almost like hymns. What keeps me reading is that Annie Dillard is fresh and original, and has something striking to say.
With the very real caveat that I am at best an amateur connoisseur of poetry, I enjoyed this early collection from Annie Dillard. They poems are earthy and the convey a sense of playful yet reflective interaction with the natural and spiritual world. In some ways they are child-like, but certainly not childish.
I am a bit obsessed with Dillard. I scour the internet for more of her. I reread her over and over. I am so sad that she seems to have stopped writing, and seems to have agoraphobia or something that prevents her from engaging in the world. Her website says,” Now I can no longer travel, can't meet with strangers, can't sign books but will sign labels with SASE, can't write by request, and can't answer letters. I've got to read and concentrate. Why? Beats me.” Maybe she is just living her life, absorbed in nature and the divine, and her family. I hope so. She gives such beauty to us in her words, and these poems are a such a cool peek into who she is, I hope she is doing okay. She is a funny human being, and her humor is on display here as well as her deep knowledge of theology and her awareness of the divine in nature. Oh I wish there was a need for an Annie Dillard scholar, and it was me. She revisits many ideas and imagery from Pilgrim at Tinker Creek, and I love it.
She starts right away in FEAST DAYS, and readers familiar with her might wait breathlessly for the glimpse of the divine after seeing a wood duck:
Today I saw a wood duck in Tinker Creek. In the fall flood, look what the creek floats down: once I glimpsed round the edge of a bank a troupe of actors rained in from Kansas, dressed for comedy.
No divinity, yet, here’s a laugh, a picture you can’t get out of your mind, but wait, here it comes, well after a while. You can't ever avoid a journey when you read anything this author writes.
One thing we’ve got plenty of here on the continents is soil…
Inside I stand at the window, god, with your name wrapped around my throat like a scarf.
Lean through the willow, look upstream, and see what’s floating down! I see camels swimming with long-lash, golden eyes…
Oh, I’ve been here and there around the heart- a few night spots, really…
I love with my hand, not my heart. When I draw your face, my fingers trace your lips. Crossing a page, my hand keeps contours: I know that art is edges…
That the soil and fresh-water lakes also rejoice as do products such as sweaters (nor are plastics excluded from grace), is less well known. Further: the reason for some silly-looking fishes, for the bizarre mating of certain adult insects, or the sprouting, say, in a snow tire of a Rocky Mountain grass, is that the universal loves the particular, that freedom loves to live and live fleshed full, intricate, and in detail.
THE SHAPE OF THE AIR Some Specifics
Cut a hole through the roof of your house leading to your bedroom closet. Close and caulk. Stand on the roof, pour plaster down into your shoes, around, through your shirts, pants, bathrobe, hats, allow to dry. Remove with hooks. Split. remove the clothes; discard. This is the shape of part of the air.
TICKETS FOR A PRAYER WHEEL The son, a scholar, speaks: Our family is looking for someone who knows how to pray. Ora pro nobis, pray for us now and now. We sent all our strong cousins out as runners. . . .
One of the cousins brought back a doll which he had purchased at great price. The doll is dressed in feathers and beads of mistletoe. His head, according to our cousin, is stuffed with millet seed; on each seed is written, in a tongue foreign to us, “PRAY.” We are uncertain whether to shake the doll like a rattle, or worship him. We took turns wearing him around our necks; we may yet stew him in a soup of herbed broths and pass him round and drink him up. Whose prayers are good? Whose prayers are good? My book says, “it is a characteristic practice to write prayers on small leaves which are then chewed and fastened on the faces of the idols.” We have lot a taste for other foods. I cannot cross a room without falling down. My mother is piecing a cover for Christ, if he should come. She feeds all strangers; she saves skins; her fingers pray over wound wool on skeins. Saint Irenaeus said collective prayer accompanied by fasting could raise the dead. Christ was unable to work miracles, according to Luke, in Nazareth, where no one had faith. Saint Irenaeus! And the dead? And the dying? I met him down the ruining stair, wearing a necklace of macaws threaded through the eyes; I met him on the flat space in the brain— thin bones strewn in a box, like lace. Pray without ceasing. Hoc licet orare, quod licet desiderare. Saint Thomas: we may pray for all those things we are not forbidden to want. But Christ says needs: your Father knows what you need before you ask him; your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. My sister, who works well in small, has made a device to strap on her wrist. A sensitive lever that touches her pulse flips open a door to a circular well in which is inscribed the word “GOD.” We hear her walking the halls or shut in her windy rooms clicking minutely her prayer. And sometimes, look how her heart beats hard:. . . . GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD GOD…. The Dominican, Gregorio Lopez, prayed continuously for three years, “Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” If we all stop at once will the arches collapse? How were those three years? There’s someone else in the house; I saw the edge of his topcoat round the stair. Mother went out to the kitchen for milk and found a kettle of bones boiling on the fire. We smell wind in our beds; we sweep dead bees and a deer leg from the fire. Our astronomers have found and named the two moons of Mars; Phobos and Deimos, dread and teror, winding over the house. What rood or aspergillum banishes this brood? We baited our hooks with burnt pigeons, with papers of prayer on a string and pieces of fire that hissed in the river. That night was clear; stars floated on water. We baited our hooks and cast them into the sky. At dawn my father drew in the line and threw the doves to the dogs. The papers of prayer were ruined, the fires put out. Reflections confuse our astronomers; many doubt the accuracy of the casts. Our gifts are rejected. Our own people despise us. Who will teach us to pray, who will pray for us now? Pascal: “Every religion which does not affirm that God is hidden is not true.” * * * * * * * * * * The third horseman, and a voice: “A quart of wheat for a denarius, and three quarts of barley for a denarius; but do not harm oil and wine!” Fast days. We feather our nests with froth; the rivers roll, the screens of mercy part. . . . Needs, he says; knock; seek; and still they die, who do not wish to leave. We must not need life. “Not as the world gives do I give to you.” My sister sleeps. My father went away. My mother serves a soup of smoke and snow. How long has it been? My diagrams cancel each other out. There is one prayer left: “Teach us to pray.” Teach us to pray. * * * * * * * * * * Later: My mother lay in a windless room under blankets, on the floor. The walls were cold, the cloth hangings without color, dry. We live among the dead…. By her bed a wooden desk appeared, stray, austere, and on it four white cups— earth, air, water, fire. Many things are becoming possible for us. We are recalling forgotten lore; we are exploring our own house and garden like hard men charting the Ultima Thule. Martin Luther prayed for rain. Under the hearth we dug down, found rain water, salt, and an old coin printed with a gold cloud. With ropes we drew up rocks hung damp in sea thong, living mussel. Under the water grew eglantine, standing either for Poetry or the saying “I wound to heal.” My father is back. The house is a plain the old man crazes through. He has carved on his belly and chest the Nicene Creed. He rubs grit in to raise the scars…. poƃ ʎɹǝʌ ɟo poƃ ʎɹǝʌ ʇɥƃıl ɟo ʇɥƃıl poƃ ɟo poƃ (*) He wants to break his will like a stick across the knee. But God meets always the prayer for faith. Woe, my father cries one day, and Mercy the next. Once he snared a nun and bid her beat him, but she beat soft. Rape? Imitation? We kept her round the house till she flew off. Something is already here. The prayer for faith routs it out the air; or, only faith can cry for itself up the short, inspirited night or down the drear day. In Luke eleven and again in Luke eighteen, Christ demands importunate prayer, prayer that does not faint. Fatigare deos, wearing God out. Is Christ as good as his word? If God does not tire, still we may tire of longing. Pray this prayer: receive our prayer. Teach us to pray, teach us to pray, to pray, pray. The river Chebar flows to the sea; the river Hiddekel flows to the sea. Maranatha, amen. My sister stands like Archimedes, drawing spirals in the sand. When the wind comes it washes her with spindrift; water fills the spirals where the sea grapes hatch. Our cousin came and called, “Hello, hello…” “Ho!” we cried, “If you are thirsty, come down to the water; ho, if you are hungry, come and sit and eat.” At last we understood he could not see or hear us. We walked in the sky; we were crossing a wooden bridge across the sea. * * * * * * * * * * You go down the hall and open the door, down the hall and open the small door, down the dark hall and open the smaller door, down the hall, small as a wire, bare, and the final door— flies from the wall. * * * * * * * * * * God in the house teaching us to pray: and the family crazed and full of breath. We nailed a picture by the door, on the whitewashed wall. My father leaned close to examine the picture, the universe—At once, the universe rang its call and clapped him in to itself, to its ebon, unthinkable thrall. God held him close and lighted for him the distant, dizzying stairs; God looped him in a sloping loop of stars. He came back and asked for a cup of cold water only. He planted beans on the bookshelf; they grew, and fed us for a year. He said, “I cannot bind the chains of the Pleiades, nor loose the cords of Orion. The one and holy God of heaven can, alone, whose hand is his face. We pray at his command a prayer of praise.” The presence of God: he picked me up and swung me like a bell. I saw the trees on fire, I rang a hundred prayers of praise. I no longer believe in divine playfulness. I saw all the time of this planet pulled like a scarf through the sky. Time, that lorn and furling oriflamme… Did God dilute even his merest thought and take a place in the scarf, shrink and cross to an olive continent and eat our food at little tables for a time? All those things which were thought to be questions are no longer important. I breathe an air like light; I slough off questions like a hundred suits of motley; I wear a bright mandorla like a gown. We keep our paper money shut in a box, for fear of fire. Once, we opened the box and Christ the lamb stepped out and left his track of flame across the floor. Why are we shown these things? God teaches us to pray. My sister dreamed of a sculpture Showing the form of God. He has no edges, and the holes in him spin. He alone is real, and all things lie in him as fossil shells curl in solid shale. My sister dreamed of God who moves around the spanding, spattered holes of solar systems hollowed in his side. I think that the dying pray at the last not “please” but “thank you” as a guest thanks his host at the door. Falling from mountains the people are crying thank you, thank you, all down the air; and the cold carriages draw up for them on the rocks. Fare away, fare away! The Dominican Gregorio Lopez prayed on God’s command. A hand raised my mother up, and round her poured a light like petalled water. For thou only art holy, thou only art the lord… and we are drowned.
This book was much better than I expected. My impression of Dillard is that she is a very good writer who too often gets carried away with her own cleverness to the point that she loses sense of direction and purpose. Sometimes she even goes so far as to say things that are baldly ridiculous, just because she thinks they sound pretty. She resisted that urge when writing most of these poems.
Like her prose, the poems here demonstrate a preoccupation with the natural world. Unlike Wendell Berry, however, she loves nature because of what it means to humanity, not as a refuge from, or a critique of, humanity. This means that her poems are softer and more inviting, even as they tend to be jagged and sharp-edged. The effect is most noticeable when she speaks of trees and wind.
There are a few meandering poems here that have pretty lines but don't amount to much. "Some Questions and Answers About Natural History" seems particularly to fall into this category. It's the cleverness taking root, not letting the truly profound flourish.
This is easy to forgive, however, when one considers three poems in particular. One, "The Man Who Wishes to Feed on Mahogany," takes its premise from a Chesterton quip about the ability of poetry only to address the familiar and commonplace rather than the bizarre and novel. It's easily one of the best poems Dillard has ever written. She turns the Chesterton quote on its head by making the man's desire commonplace, and showing the altogether strange nature of desire itself.
The next poem of note is "An Epistemology of Planets" in which the poet addresses each of the planets in our Solar System directly. Somehow she manages to offer impressions of the planets themselves, the entities they're named for or represent, and their role in the heavens. It's short, but impressive.
Finally, the titular "Tickets for a Prayer Wheel" is probably the best thing I've read by Dillard (with the possible exception of her essay "An Expedition to the Pole" in the collection Teaching a Stone to Talk—absolutely brilliant). It deals with the struggle of mortals to pray, the fear of unanswered prayer, the fear of answered prayer, and the nature of death and grief. It does all this in a lilting dark free verse that is itself prayer-like. I don't like everything Dillard writes, but I will defend her stature as a great American poet in virtue of this poem alone.
expected the theatric melodrama of early Glück but NO ! bright, springy poems full of quintessential Dillard sap. Coming-of-age musings about tradition, nature, lost loves, loss, and placement in the world. A kindred spirit - she drinks from the same well i do: the Gospel accounts, Thoreau, Teresa of Avila, and Brother Pascal.
Some poems are funny! Some are slender and gutting and earthy! The ones that blend naturalistic images and observations with thoughts about faith are her finest, which holds true about her writing at large. Some motifs and individual poems are unpolished and underwhelming, but on the whole i am pleasantly delighted & will probably be thinking of this collection often, for the rest of my life.
highlights :
-the out-loud mouth feel of “Trees that have loved / in silence, kiss,/ crashing; the Douglas firs lean/ low to the brittle embrace / of a lodge pile pine.” , the opening stanza of “Christmas”
-all of “Tickets for a Prayer Wheel”. Holy hell Annie Dillard!! could place in tradition with “The Waste Land” and some other modernist poem i can’t think of. Maybe even a response to “Howl” ?????????
-“Feast Days” and “The Man Who Wishes to Feed on Mahogany” were deeeeeeeelightful to read aloud. really enjoyed toting this collection around with me to read at intervals - it let me savor & bask in “feast days”. will be returning to that soon.
When she’s good, she’s great. When she’s mediocre, she’s still better than Louise Glück’s first 4 books of poetry.
Titular poem of this collection is astonishing, especially on my second read. One of the most visceral, ravishing poems on prayer, spirituality and God I’ve personally read.
Continue to relate to Annie’s obsession with eskimos/the Arctic. And she’s really funny! A lot of these are weighty but she brings so much levity they’re all a joy to read.
Very good!
“My sister dreamed of a sculpture Showing the form of God. He has no edges, and the holes in him spin. He alone is real, and all things lie in him as fossil shells curl in solid shale. My sister dreamed of God who moves around the spanding, spattered holes of solar systems hollowed in his side.”
Complete incoherence. This volume, highly rated by some people I enjoy reading, must have gained acclaim initially by some toked up spiritualist from the plains who then made it popular to some upper east side celeb who then disseminated it unread to the masses. Ever poem I read made zero sense, and with each verse I grew more and more annoyed. There is a sense in which the poet (a real poet) can only be understood by unlocking the door to their turn of phrase or their context. But this goes to far. When every verse is one incohesion indecorously slapped upon another, tracing the mind of the author becomes more difficult than time or desire allows.
She won a Pulitzer in 1975 for Pilgrim at Tinker Creek.
For my taste, Annie’s poetry isn’t Pulitzer material. She offers an interesting range of subjects, but her poetry is without passion and excites no lyric enthusiasm. The clincher: it sounds boring when I read it aloud. Give me Mary Oliver any day. Read more of my book reviews and poems here: www.richardsubber.com
The final poem, which the collection is named for, contains some of the clear-eyed bewildered wonder at the mysteries of G-d and the natural world that I've loved in her essays and prose, but all the rest were unmemorable at best and annoying at worst.
annie dillard has become my writing idol. i love the way she thinks, i love the way she expresses, i love her. i just got three books in the mail of hers that i ordered and one of them had a picture of her on the inside cover, which i cut out, and is now taped to my writing desk :) if you want to try her out, start with "pilgrim at tinker creek", it is the kind of book you can read all at once or in fragments. sometimes i like to read just a few paragraphs or pages before i go to sleep.
There are days when i am not sure whether i do or do not like Annie Dillard's style of writing. I think poetry fits her style of writing the best after having read this collection, and it has also made me appreciate her essays and novels much more. I would recommend reading this during November/ December months.
some of these poems become sentences in later prose work - it isnt surprising... my first reading of annie dillard was followed by the delight of finding her other books - encounters with chinese writers, holy the firm, mornings like this, the living - and each in its turn...
What a beautiful, seemingly-easy way with words Annie Dillard has. There is a breeziness about her...her lines move like something natural...a breeze, a creek. Mmm.
Read her poem about the planets and then listen to Holst's "Planets," just for fun.
Fantastic little book of poetry... Dillard's work is beautiful and organic, and often creates a lovely sense of yearning. This is particularly the case with the title poem, which is my personal favorite.
This book would be rated higher I'm certain by someone who likes poetry. I was given the book by a good friend, and it was signed by Ms. Dillard, who was—at the time—a visiting adjunct writing professor at Rollins College. I hardly ever work hard to read. I can admit that. I read for pleasure. But I really gave a lot of effort and attention to this book of poems. Sadly, that's probably why I didn't enjoy it. Several of the poems did not me on an an "emotional insight" level. I do think Ms. Dillard has a sound, deep grasp of the American Condition especially for middle aged intellectual females at the beginning of the technological era. I wish I enjoyed poetry. I really do. The fact that I was able TO enjoy a lot in this collection says everything and is a resounding recommendation...coming from me.
"Further: the reason for some silly-looking fishes, for the bizarre mating of certain adult insects, or the sprouting, say, in a snow tire of a Rocky Mountain grass, is that the universal loves the particular, that freedom loves to live and live fleshed full, intricate, and in detail."
This was wondrous and delicious in such a uniquely Dillard way.
I love Annie Dillard’s prose, having read several of her non-fiction works, and her poetry is just as lovely. Some of the poems were hit or miss for me, but I loved many in the first and third sections of the book. Much of her poetic style reminds me of Mary Oliver, though it is very much her own.
Dillard is a favorite - words, phrases, sentences steeped in reverence, nature, and the mystical. Sometimes profound and always interesting. Her poetry isn't always as clear as her prose, but her words are always worth reading.
She definitely a nonfiction writer. I liked "Some Questions and Answers about Natural History" and "Puppy in Deep Snow," as well as the title poem mostly because of how much it sounds like her nonfiction prose.
Good, not great. Dillard’s prose is often more poetic than her poetry. This collection is a bit uneven in its ability to engage the reader. There are snippets of beauty and a few well-turned phrases, but mostly, these poems fell flat for me.
This is her first published book -- or first book of poetry, would have to check the jacket. Let's just say that she "showed promise" at that stage and was striving to become better and become known.
Really like Dillard’s use of language and playfulness. Don’t always follow what’s going on, of course, but will be returning to these poems for new discoveries.