One of the things that seems to puzzle many is that the bout of ‘decolonization’ in the third quarter of the 20th century – what some call juridicial-administrative independence, and what Sylvia Tamale calls ‘flag decolonization’ in this powerful, richly layered exploration of power in contemporary Africa – did little to bring about a state of freedom. A large part of this lies in the observation widely attributed to Steve Biko, one of the anti-apartheid struggle’s key thinkers, that the most powerful weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed. Tamale, a Uganda-based legal scholar, takes this idea and explores it not in abstract psycho-philosophical ways, but in the very real ways systems of power play out in peoples’ lives.
At the heart of her argument is the notion that despite ‘flag decolonization’, cultural and intellectual systems of authority and dominance continue to hold sway in social, cultural and other everyday ways. Here she identifies four principal ways that Indigenous ways of knowing are marginalised and colonialism (as a mode of thinking and being) are reproduced and sustained. These methods are ones we can all quite easily recognise, where ‘Othering’ accentuates the difference of the stranger and not our commonalities; where Indigenous (non-colonial) ways of being and knowing are undervalued to the extent of becoming invisible; where the complexities of being are reduced to binary logic with one part of that binary granted Power and universal authority; and where those universalised ways are made authoritative – and in being so become close to unassailable. One of the pleasures of this text is that this explicit statement of coloniality’s ways of operating comes late in the piece (about 2/3 of the way through) with the effect that the conceptual and theoretical points make sense as flowing clearly from what has gone before.
That said, the case opens with some definitional stuff as well, outlining the key concepts to follow: this might need some care and patience – not because of fault or error, but because some of these ideas a large and complex, with the nuance and subtlety that can come with that. That said, Tamale is very good at grounding much of this discussion in ‘real world’ experience, drawing out distinction between what she calls the political and psychological in decolonization, highlighting the multiplicity of ways we exist in our social networks (as part of an intersectional unpacking), and accentuating the patterns and dynamics of gender as well as the distinctiveness of Afro-Feminist ways of making sense of those patterns and dynamics.
Possibly because of her legal training she is very good at the relations between structure (‘rules’ and institutions) and experience as she unpacks ways that those structures disempower women through rules around gender, sexuality, bodies, notions of the family as well as ‘higher level’ concepts such as human rights and customary law. If this was all this book did then I’d be happy with it as a series of case studies and unpacking of issues and questions, but she goes a step further. The analyses come together in a powerful unpicking of the gendering of notions of Pan Africanism as a decolonial practice that sustains patriarchal power and dominance. This unpicking leads to a useful discussion of ‘what is to be done’, and a reminder of just how big that ‘doing’ needs to be – partly because of the diversity of Africannesses that there are, partly because of the complexities of the intersectionalities she draws out.
That question of diversity of ways of being ‘African’ is an important part of the issue, and a site of vulnerability. Tamale is quite open early in the discussion that her use of ‘African’ and ’Western’ as categories hides a myriad of distinctions, so makes sure to delve as much as possible into specificities – at times down to the level of individual legal cases and specific moments of political and social contest and struggle. In this way she fairly carefully manages those tensions between the general and specific. I particularly welcomed this in her deployment of the notion of Ubuntu as an Indigenous alternative to oppressive, individualising rationalities of modernity. Too often I see this term deployed unproblematically, as if it is a universal across the continent. Tamale is much more cautious, noting its origins in South African discourse and practice, highlighting that many of the key ways of thinking towards decoloniality are more advanced in South Africa than elsewhere, while also noting that it encapsulates some key principles that are shared and manifest in different ways across the continent.
There are limits to this specificity however. North Africa is less well represented than the rest of the continent, but she also makes very clear that colonial imposition comes from several sources including but not only the spread of religious ideas, practices and institutions associated with both Christianity and Islam as well as other dynamics of occupation throughout the growth of Europe’s empires. The second limitation lies in the risks of moving across multiple sites and questions. For instance, there is a rich exploration of definitions of gender and sexualities that Tamale explores through an discussion of the comparative treatments of Caster Semenya and Michael Phelps by international sports governing bodies, but that fails to recognise the roles and presence of different governing bodies and subsumes Semenya and Phelps under the same set of rules where there are different organisations for swimming and athletics. This glitch doesn’t undermine her point, but it does risk making it less credible.
The diversities and complexities of ‘Africa’ and the details of specific cases therefore mean that this is not a comprehensive and holistic analysis but one that poses as many questions about local and specific circumstances as it does provide ways to think through and around those cases. That is to say, as rich as the detail of the discussion is, this is as good to think with as it is an exploration of the specifics of the coloniality:Afro-feminist contradiction. The richness of the material also flows from Tamale’s grounding of her investigation and analysis in specific as well as generalised feminist and queer struggles and relations.
These factors combine to make this an important and significant contribution to a growing body of work that is moving us well beyond the limitations of flag decolonization to a more deep seated set of decolonial struggles. We’re a fractious lot, those of us who work in and around these decolonial ideas and struggles – and while this book may be limited to a specific academic readership, it’s also an important step along that intellectual road and the struggles it links with.