No other radical historian has reached so many hearts and minds as Howard Zinn. It is rare that a historian of the Left has managed to retain as much credibility while refusing to let his academic mantle change his beautiful writing style from being anything but direct, forthright, and accessible. Whether his subject is war, race, politics, economic justice, or history itself, each of his works serves as a reminder that to embrace one's subjectivity can mean embracing one's humanity, that heart and mind can speak with one voice. Here, in six sections, is the historian's own choice of his shorter essays on some of the most critical problems facing America throughout its history, and today.
Howard Zinn was an American historian, playwright, philosopher, socialist intellectual and World War II veteran. He was chair of the history and social sciences department at Spelman College, and a political science professor at Boston University. Zinn wrote more than 20 books, including his best-selling and influential A People's History of the United States in 1980. In 2007, he published a version of it for younger readers, A Young People's History of the United States.
Zinn described himself as "something of an anarchist, something of a socialist. Maybe a democratic socialist." He wrote extensively about the civil rights movement, the anti-war movement and labor history of the United States. His memoir, You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train (Beacon Press, 1994), was also the title of a 2004 documentary about Zinn's life and work. Zinn died of a heart attack in 2010, at the age of 87.
Once you have read A People's History and are interested in more of Zinn's views on the world and politics, this collection of essays from The Nation and The Progressive is a wonderful way of enjoying his wit and intelligence.
Wake up and smell the truth.: "A People's History of the United States" forever changed the way I viewed the world and the system I grew up in. Continuing that tradition, "The Zinn Reader..", wakes up a desire in one's soul to rise up and do something about the injustices and hypocrisies that have dominated our past and continued to swallow our present. Professor Zinn write clearly, honestly, and furiously about topics ranging from the distribution of wealth to the ideal uses of scholarship and intellectualism. He lacks no emotion or fury, unlike many other historians. The main challenge Zinn makes it to exercise free thought, and "to be skeptical of someone else's reality." Very few historians, or writers for that matter, dare to look at the world from the perspective of the poor, the disenfranchised, the bombed, the murdered, the jailed, the conquered, the victim, but Zinn does exactly that, and in doing so puts out a masterful collection that not only instructs us in History, but also challenges our humanity and our place in the world.
The essay that stands out the most to me is the one on how there can be NO just wars. His argument is pretty great: take a war that was widely held to be just (WWII) and show the many ways in which it might not be. It follows, therefore, that if our best candidate for a just war comes up short, it is likely that others will not be just, either. Smart and ballsy.
When I was in college, an acquaintance told me that Howard Zinn had a profound impact on him. I, with a minor interest in American history, made a mental note to check him out.
This man is more extreme than I had imagined. He is a self described radical, he sympathizes with anarchists, abominates the notion of a "good war," and thinks capitalism and the prevailing social structure desperately need to be radically altered. From what I understand he thinks wealth is disproportionately distributed because of the existing laws and justice system and that people believe in and trust the current system because everything they learn is built upon that ridiculous foundation. The only way to escape this is a radical revolution (violence might be necessary).
Keeping in mind how I fundamentally disagree with him on many issues, some of his essays were thought-provoking for me. I enjoyed reading about the equal rights movement sit-ins. It was an episode I hadn't heard much of, and I'm glad I know about it.
In his essay explaining that there are no "good wars," he convinced me that the United States may not have fought for good reasons, but he did not convince me that we should not have fought in it at all.
He's also given me much to think about concerning civil disobedience. How far can a person go when his own morality demands it?
Who should read it? Conservatives comfortable with opposing viewpoints. Who shouldn't read it? Liberals. (Adding fuel to the fire) Everyone else interested in history can learn a little bit, but should tread cautiously lest Dr. Zinn's radicalism ensnares them.
What I would recommend: The Sections on Race, War, and (if you want more) Law.
Come on 'round kiddies, let everyone's favorite radical grandpa tell you a story about how things really were...not the way you were taught in school. I adore Howard Zinn. He can relate incredibly complex subjects down to easily digestible stories so that even dipshits like me can comprehend what's going on.
'I can understand pessimism, but I don't believe in it. It's not simply a matter of faith, but of historical evidence. Not overwhelming evidence, just enough to give hope, because for hope we don't need certainty, only posssibility.'
Amazon was pretty much giving this away a while back, but it would be a pretty good deal even at full price.
700 some-odd pages long, this is an anthology of magazine articles, essays, chapters from various books, introductions he wrote to other people's books and what have you. It would make a great compliment to A People's History of the United States, which is required reading for my brothers in the Blame America First community, and truth be told, it's a more entertaining read.
You get to learn way more about about his life growing up in the immigrant slums of Brooklyn, back in the dark ages, his time as a bombardier in World War II, dropping tons of napalm on a town in France that didn't have shit to do with the war, the time he spent as a professor at Spelman College and as an active participant in the civil rights movement, and his opposition to the Vietnam War in the '60s and '70s.
Articles span from maybe the 1950s all the way into the Obama administration -- which is weird given that he died in early 2010. The most recent one must not have been written very long before he died.
I miss Howard Zinn so much. I wish he was around to write about history as it's unfolding right now. Readable, unapologetically subjective, and prosaic, Zinn reminds us that history is alive and tangible.
This book is a great survey of the breadth of Zinn's own history as historian journalist. From his childhood to his service to his early years of political activism, Zinn takes us on his journey, but focuses on the world around him as he journeys through it.
This is definitely going on the reading list for both of my sons' high school history curriculum.
Collection of essays and excerpts. Overall, it's pretty interesting, but the level of intellectual rigor is not exactly consistent. His argument against war, for example, is pretty thin and has never sat with me right. Whenever I think of it, all I see is Mr. Mackey saying, "War is bad because it's bad, m'kay?" That's essentially the level of argument we're dealing with here.
Phối màu đồng phục là một nghệ thuật và một khoa học, đòi hỏi sự kết hợp giữa kiến thức về thương hiệu, tâm lý màu sắc, xu hướng thiết kế và đặc thù ngành nghề. Bằng cách hiểu rõ bản sắc thương hiệu, sử dụng màu sắc chủ đạo và màu nhấn một cách chiến lược, chú trọng chất liệu và kiểu dáng, đồng thời cân nhắc yếu tố môi trường và mục đích sử dụng, doanh nghiệp có thể tạo ra những bộ đồng phục không chỉ đẹp mắt mà còn là một công cụ mạnh mẽ để tạo sự nhận diện tốt, góp phần vào sự thành công chung của doanh nghiệp. Để đạt được hiệu quả này, việc hợp tác với các nhà cung cấp mẫu đồng phục công ty đẹp nhất uy tín và chuyên nghiệp như Hải Anh Uniform là chìa khóa để hiện thực hóa tầm nhìn về một bộ đồng phục mang đậm dấu ấn thương hiệu.
Sử Dụng Màu Sắc Chủ Đạo và Màu Nhấn Chiến Lược Một trong những cách hiệu quả nhất để phối màu đồng phục tạo sự nhận diện là sử dụng màu sắc chủ đạo của thương hiệu một cách thông minh và kết hợp với màu nhấn chiến lược.
Màu sắc chủ đạo: Đây là màu sắc chính yếu của thương hiệu, thường là màu logo. Đồng phục nên lấy màu này làm nền hoặc làm màu chính cho chiếc áo. Ví dụ, nếu logo của bạn có màu xanh dương, chiếc áo polo hoặc sơ mi đồng phục có thể là màu xanh dương. Điều này giúp khách hàng dễ dàng nhận diện thương hiệu ngay từ xa. Màu nhấn (Accent Color): Là màu sắc bổ sung, thường tương phản hoặc hài hòa với màu chủ đạo, được dùng để tạo điểm nhấn và tăng tính thẩm mỹ. Màu nhấn có thể xuất hiện ở cổ áo, viền tay áo, nẹp áo, đường may, hoặc các chi tiết phụ trợ như cúc áo, chỉ thêu logo. Ví dụ, áo màu xanh dương có thể phối viền cổ màu cam (nếu cam là màu phụ trong logo), hoặc áo màu ghi có đường line màu đỏ. Việc sử dụng màu nhấn một cách có chủ đích giúp may đồng phục không bị đơn điệu, tạo sự hấp dẫn thị giác mà vẫn giữ được sự chuyên nghiệp. Nguyên tắc tương phản và hài hòa: Tương phản cao: Nếu logo có màu sáng, nền áo nên là màu tối và ngược lại để logo nổi bật. Ví dụ, logo trắng trên nền áo xanh đậm. Sự tương phản giúp logo dễ nhìn rõ từ xa. Hài hòa (Analogous/Monochromatic): Sử dụng các sắc độ khác nhau của cùng một màu, hoặc các màu nằm cạnh nhau trên bánh xe màu. Cách phối này tạo cảm giác dịu mắt, tinh tế và chuyên nghiệp. Ví dụ, áo xanh dương đậm phối với viền xanh dương nhạt. Khi kết hợp màu sắc, cần lưu ý đến tâm lý màu sắc và ý nghĩa của chúng trong ngành nghề của bạn. Màu xanh thường gợi cảm giác tin cậy, màu đỏ gợi sự năng động, màu vàng gợi sự vui tươi. Điều này sẽ giúp đồng phục không chỉ đẹp mà còn truyền tải đúng thông điệp.
Chất Liệu và Kiểu Dáng Hỗ Trợ Phối Màu Chất liệu và kiểu dáng cũng đóng vai trò quan trọng trong việc hỗ trợ việc phối màu để tạo sự nhận diện tốt. xem thêm: https://haianhuniform.com/dong-phuc-cong-ty/ao-dong-phuc-polo/ Chất liệu: Vải có bề mặt mịn màng (như kate, cotton trơn) sẽ làm màu sắc hiển thị rõ nét hơn, trong khi vải có kết cấu (như vải cá sấu) có thể làm màu sắc trông khác đi một chút. Màu sắc trên các loại vải khác nhau cũng có thể có sắc độ khác nhau, vì vậy cần kiểm tra mẫu vải thực tế. Kiểu dáng: Một số kiểu dáng áo (như áo polo, áo khoác bomber) dễ dàng kết hợp các mảng phối màu hơn áo sơ mi truyền thống. Việc thiết kế các đường cắt may độc đáo cũng có thể được tận dụng để tạo ra các khối màu ấn tượng. Kỹ thuật in/thêu: Đảm bảo kỹ thuật in ấn (in lụa, in chuyển nhiệt, in kỹ thuật số) hoặc thêu vi tính có thể tái tạo màu sắc logo một cách chính xác và sắc nét, bền màu theo thời gian. Một logo bị phai màu hoặc mờ nhòe sẽ làm giảm khả năng nhận diện. Các nhà cung cấp đồng phục chuyên nghiệp như Hải Anh Uniform có kinh nghiệm dày dặn trong việc tư vấn phối màu. Họ không chỉ hiểu về các nguyên tắc thiết kế mà còn có khả năng mô phỏng màu sắc trên nhiều chất liệu vải khác nhau, giúp doanh nghiệp hình dung chính xác sản phẩm cuối cùng. Từ việc chọn màu sắc chủ đạo phù hợp với khí hậu Đà Nẵng đến việc phối các gam màu nhấn một cách tinh tế, Hải Anh Uniform sẽ đảm bảo đồng phục của bạn nổi bật và chuyên nghiệp.
Après avoir dévoré A People's History of the United States, qui se trouvait tout en bas de la bibliographie donnée en fac d'anglais, et que franchement peu de mes camarades avaient feuilleté, il faut avouer que le point de vue de cet historien américain, radical et socialiste, était une surprise totale. Les livres d'histoire sont souvent froids de faits et donne un point de vue général. Pourquoi alors ne pas découvrir d'autres essais et articles de Zinn? Nouvelle surprise. Howard Zinn a vécu directement certains événements majeurs ou moins, mais non moins importants de ce qui a conduit à des changements importants aux États Unis. Vous êtes intéressés par le Civil Rights Movement ou les mouvements de protestation contre la guerre du Vietnam? Allez-y, saisissez-vous de ce gros volume. Il y a également des articles sur les mouvements de travailleurs, les abus de pouvoir, la liberté, l'éducation, le tout à travers le point de vue d'un homme engagé. Malgré certains fils conducteurs qui se répètent, il s'agit après tout d'une collection d'essais sur le thème de la démocratie et la désobéissance civile, vous en aurez pour votre faim, recueillant tout au fil du livre une riche collection de références conventionnelles ou pas.
Hélène and I met Mr. Zinn twice. He was presenting a play that he written with I believe his daughter.I had heard much about him. Had never read his books. His articles yes. This books is a compilation of his experiences and writings. I just finished reading about Hoover...It was quite bone-chilling to read the real insides of the events down south. Also the fact that he was a vet. I too am a vet.So I found myself relating to his angst of being part of a military war machine that chews on humanity and spits out the carcasses of disposable part of the societal machine . Yes it is a stunning tour de force. Please read it.
“In the light of such experiences, traditional dogmatic "class analysis" cannot remain intact. But as dogma disintegrates, hope appears. Because it seems that human beings, whatever their backgrounds, are more open than we think, that their behavior cannot be confidently predicted from their past, that we are all creatures vulnerable to new thoughts, new attitudes. And while such vulnerability creates all sorts of possibilities, both good and bad, its very existence is exciting. It means that no human being should be written off, no change in thinking deemed impossible.” (167)
My biggest takeaway from the Zinn Reader was that historic figures, particularly revolutionaries, should be understood in light of their revolutions and not through contemporary legal/social mores. Otherwise the omnibus is a leftist feel good diatribe.
A book that took a long time, but worth every session I sat down to take it all in. I never thought I could agree so wholeheartedly with a person who collected his “best” work in 750 pages. It’s all there: his experienced pacifism, his civil rights and feminist activism, his deep dive into the underbelly of the history of the US, and more. I did not know that one person in contemporary academia had such a broad reach of passion and word count. I am one of his target audience, for sure.
It's hard to succinctly explain my feelings about all 700-odd pages of this collection. I came out of it with a great admiration for Howard Zinn as a man of principle who isn't afraid to act. He also isn't afraid to challenge ideals of patriotism or "justice" or law and order. Most of all, I enjoyed the first section on race, his observations from Spelman and from various Southern protest movements. I was most surprised by his overwhelming optimism. The world is unjust and violent and unequal, but Zinn has a great deal of hope in the power of people to recognize truth and change things to fit with it even when governments and powers oppose them. Fittingly, the book ended with a commencement speech he gave at Spelman entitled "Against Discouragement."
This book is essential if you want to be introduced to Zinn. Well, hell. It's just damn essential, even if you don't. You should. Read it is what I'm saying. If there is a better way to trace the common values that inspire civil rights efforts, labor rights efforts and pacifist efforts I have yet to find it. Zinn, over the course of 40 years and prolific essays, links the struggle for human dignity across decades and accurately lays accountability at the feet of the inhabitors of the structures of concentrated wealth and power. Clearly composed and astutely explained history that will forever color how you process what you are told by the powered gentry of your day...
I would suggest anyone wanting to get into the mind of Zinn to read “A People’s History of the United States” and “You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train” first and then the “Zinn Reader” as a good review of his writings over the years. This is broken into sections on Race, Class, War, and History that cover much of the same writings that were included in his other collections. A great existential look at the wild ride of the last 40+ years of US history through the eyes of someone with a front row seat to the struggles and tribulations of our times. A real gut check of what each of us has and is willing to do with our lives.
I expected more of a how to than a regurgitation of Zinn's other works. The same works are anthologized over and over and sold under separate titles, this is to be expected. However Zinn seems to plagerize his own essays at times, using the same situation as a response to several provacative subjects. Sometimes it seems he uses the least appropriate stories. If this is the first and ONLY Zinn reader you read, then it will blow your face off. If not, you will fall asleep and probably not finish it.
In school I learned U.S. History. When I read Howard Zinn I learn the history of the United States. Like his Peoples History of America the Zinn Reader was excellent. It is a compilation of 61 essays, articles, writings divided into six themes:Race, Class, War, Law, History, Means & Ends. I would give a 5 to about 1/3 of the book and a 4 to the other 2/3. Overall a 4.5. Recommend to all interested in learning about us.
J'ai entamé ce livre il y a quelques mois déjà, et je le reprends de temps en temps pour lire un ou deux articles, selon mon intérêt du moment. Son format permet ce genre de lecture étalée, et de le redécouvrir est à chaque fois un plaisir. Zinn y est très généreux de ses expériences de vie, de ses observations, de ses réflexions.
The book is broken down by sections like History, Race, Class, etc. The collected writings are mostly short and very accessible. This is an awesome intro to some of the radical themes present in American history. (Zinn is not the MOST RADICAL writer, but he's a very fair writer, as well as passionate.)