Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Pushkin: A Comparative Commentary

Rate this book
This digitally reprinted edition of A Comparative Commentary has the same content as the original 1971 edition. Professor Bayley, in this first critical assessment in English of the whole range of Pushkin's writing, examines his achievement in relation to Russian literature and the European tradition, analysing Pushkin's language in detail to illustrate how he obtains his literary effects.

378 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1971

16 people want to read

About the author

John Bayley

110 books23 followers
Professor John Bayley CBE, FBA, FRSL was a British literary critic and writer.

Bayley was born in Lahore, British India, and educated at Eton, where he studied under G. W. Lyttelton, who also taught Aldous Huxley, J.B.S. Haldane, George Orwell and Cyril Connolly. After leaving Eton, he went on to take a degree at New College, Oxford. From 1974 to 1992, Bayley was Warton Professor of English at Oxford. He is also a novelist and writes literary criticism for several newspapers. He edited Henry James' The Wings of the Dove and a two-volume selection of James' short stories.

From 1956 until her death in 1999, he was married to the writer Dame Iris Murdoch. When she was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, he wrote the book Iris: A Memoir of Iris Murdoch, which was made into the 2001 film Iris by Richard Eyre. In this film, Bayley was portrayed in his early years by Hugh Bonneville, and in his later years by Jim Broadbent, who won an Oscar for the performance. After Murdoch's death he married Audi Villers, a family friend. He was awarded the CBE in 1999.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (50%)
4 stars
0 (0%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
1 (50%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Illiterate.
2,797 reviews56 followers
November 1, 2023
Bayley notes Pushkin’s parody/exploration of genres. But his analysis of individual works loses sight of that theme and gets bogged down in details.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.