This booklet gives helpful historical and philosophical context for Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein. An interview from the author’s podcast led me to read E. Michael Jones’s book, Monster’s From the Id. That book proved to be one of the most intriguing books I have ever read. Afterward, I read Shelly’s Frankenstein and I am grateful for the literary journey that podcast episode has inspired.
Although I think the interpretive idea presented in this guide is interesting, I am not fully convinced that Shelly was offering a critique of her husband’s ideas. I think that the monster certainly embodies her husband’s radical ideas, but according to Frankenstein’s monster the envy and wrath comes as a consequence of not being accepted. The monster was originally good natured and gentle. Society corrupted it. At least, according to the monster.
I wonder if Mrs. Shelley (through Frankenstein’s monster) is offering an excuse for her husbands ideas while admitting the real consequences of them. It is mostly God and society’s fault for not accepting her husband and his ideas than it is Percy’s. This would explain the use of Milton’s quote at the beginning of the work, “Did I request thee, Maker, from my clay to mold me man? Did I solicit thee from darkness to promote me?”