This is a collection of essays written by philosophy graduates. Some of them presumably teach in universities. On the whole, it is very uneven and generally disappointing. Most of the essays commit the problems of begging the question and attacking the straw man. Worse, although the first introductory essay lauds the Socratic method, subsequent ones couldn’t resist the temptation of offering answers — usually wrong — and moralising. In the twenty first century, most so-called philosophical questions are better answered by other disciplines such as psychology and economics. The role of philosophy is to identify and clarify points of contention. It is decidedly not to provide dogmatic answers. Many authors in this book masquerade their opinions as leading or rhetorical questions. These are sometimes not even thinly veiled. In having said all these, the book does stimulate the reader to think from fresh perspectives about interesting and pertinent topics. However, the reader does need some background skills in rational thinking to start with, otherwise he or she will possibly be seduced to draw absurd conclusions. Three stars.