Take note.... Notice that Malkiel really hasn't written another book since 2009?
.......
Amazone
Die Hard Market Efficient Hypothesis That Can't Make Money in Market
Well, Malkiel continue his thesis of MEH, EMT. If you want to invest for financial freedom or get into business of money management you should "browse" this book and also the infamous "Random Walk on Wallstreet" by this guy then study Mr. Warren Buffett, Benjamin Graham, Charlie Munger, Seth Klarman Value Investing or if you are good at technology, you might want to study Ray Dalio, James Harris Simon (Renaissance Technologies) all billionaires but using different way of investment philosophies. But the authors of the book say they do not exists - the reason is - he can't figure it out. So he keep writing books to prove that you can't beat the market.
JVI
[Note: Jim Simons is pretty much a guy who trades a zillion stocks where everything is 0.5% to 2% of his portfolio max, and all he does is quick trades for fast profits, but how his methodology works is by his empire of massively having access to margin, so he's got multiplier effects, buying like 20x the stock that anyone else could buy....
So basically it's massive cash dumps into like 50 small quick profitable trades, and winning 4o or 45 of them, over and over again]
[And well the efficient market hypothesis basically just like to feel value investing will never work out, which only works if investing and analysts have the reliability of a dart board, which might have been true in the days of the vacuum tube television era]
......
I have read previous books by each author, and had really expected more - MUCH MORE.
The salient investing advice in this book could be expressed in a single paragraph.
wannabe
.......
Could be condensed to two or three pages without much loss
it feels padded out
Strunk and White is still the most concise resource for those who want to write effectively, but it's not repetitious, whereas The Elements of Investing elucidates a few simple rules, some of which are so obvious as not to be helpful... and then draws out whole chapters around them.
The book really boils down to this:
1) Use a low-cost index fund weighted towards global markets
2) Use government incentives for saving
3) Keep a diverse portfolio, with bonds as well as stocks
4) Invest for the long term
There's really not much more to it. Given the wealth of investment experience the two authors possess, this appears pretty uninspired.
The other frustrating element is that many private investors are in the game because they like to research companies, pick their own stocks and attempt to beat the market. But the authors say this is a waste of time and you're far better off buying an index fund, which requires almost no skill.
jacr100
......
Don't waste your time and money
Investing is a complicated business, and not for the faint hearted. If you have considered this book because it will reveal previously unknown secrets, then, sorry to disappoint you, it doesn't.
Do yourself a favour, just find an Adviser you can trust, let them advise you on which product wrappers you need and let them help choose the Fund Managers to look after your long term money - they'll pick stocks much more effectively and they'll monitor the perfomance more often and with more expertise than you ever could.
bluefunk
.....
It was a very short book and one slow reader could easily cover it all in 5 minutes.
It brought a few common sense to the table
so it's useful if you have no common sense
As elementary as
- Save More!
- Don't put all your eggs in one basket
- You are dumb and try not to bugger it up
Distilled and concise. Perhaps too much so.
H.H.L.
......
A simplistic approach to long term saving
Burt Malkiel is the household name behind the far better A Random Walk Down Wall Street: A Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing, the book that posits the efficiency of the financial markets.
The Elements of Investing, co-written with Vanguard director Charles Ellis, is in essence a Saving For Dummies title. Not about Investing, but about long term Saving. The book is written exclusively for a US audience and practical recommendations (e.g. tax tips, fund selections) are entirely irrelevant to non-US savers.
There's nothing wrong with writing a book about saving, unless you call it a book about investing.
Investing presupposes you intend to take risk in order to make a profit, saving means you try to exclude risk and therefore settle for a lesser return.
Malkiel's proposal is that all should save by investing in low cost broad-based market index funds (or equivalent ETFs) and start doing so early on to benefit from compounding interest.
He also advises practicing dollar cost averaging by regularly saving fixed amounts over long periods of time.
Malkiel does not believe we can outguess any other investor, let alone the market as a whole, in how a stock or even a market is going to perform. There's arguably plenty of academic research to back up the underperformance of fund managers, and Malkiel's advice is therefore not entirely unreasonable.
If you're an investment/finance ignoramus (aren't we all to some extent? OK, I'll hold my hand up to that one), this advice is even very relevant. But, it is less so if you're a more seasoned market observer/participant. Malkiel and Ellis make sweeping judgments pertaining to e.g. charting/technical analysis, but then proceed to lend some credence to behavioural finance. I'd have thought charting is the graphical interpretation of behavioural finance precepts.
Only value investors, spearheaded by Buffett, find some grace in Malkiel's eyes and it is noticeable that he, humbly, puts himself and Ellis in that league.
Another sweeping piece of advice contains the avoidance of credit cards altogether because they cost too much and make you dependent on your lender's repayment terms. That's true, unless you always repay your balance in full in which case a free card means one month's free credit every 12 months of the year. That should be worth something, not?
Finally, there's enough research by McKinlay and other reputed authors to show financial markets are not fully efficient. Some humility would, thus, behove Messrs. Malkiel and Ellis.
All in all, this is an interesting read for your average US citizen having lost his faith in the markets, funds and tipsters alike and seeking a new haven for his hard earned cash. Malkiel points the way to a form of low risk saving. His cost benchmark is that no fund should be charging more than, say, 0.25% in annual management fees which excludes just about every index fund in the UK and Continental Europe.
Why Wiley decided to publish this book in the otherwise excellent series of the "Little Book Big Profits" investment titles is a mystery to me, but the name Malkiel was probably the deciding factor.
James Montier's The Little Book of Behavioral Investing: How Not to be Your Own Worst Enemy (Little Book, Big Profits) is far more deserving with respect to the subject matter tentatively broached by Malkiel.
Kurt Steiner
......