I rate this mystery 4,5 rounded up to 5 stars.
It was a beautiful, engaging read, maybe even thanks to the setting so different from my usual choices.
Breaking away from my usual tracks could have been a great thing or a disaster, luckily it was the first, indeed I really enjoyed this book.
Before expressing my opinion, let me tell you a little about THE PLOT:
Ancient Greece Athens, 443 BC.
After decades of war with Persia, peace has finally come to Athens. The city is being rebuilt, and commerce and culture are flourishing.
Aspiring playwright Philocles has come home to find a man with his throat cut slumped against his front gate. Is it just a robbery gone wrong? But, if so, why didn't the thieves take the dead man's valuables? With the play that could make his name just days away, he must find out who this man is, why he has been murdered - and why the corpse was left in his doorway.
But Philocles soon realises he has been caught up in something far bigger, and there are those who don't want him looking any further.
-----------------------
___ ENTHRALLING PLOT ____
The reading was gripping from the first chapter, the author seamlessly and captivatingly blended a layer of mystery, one entirely imaginative, with the reality of politics, culture, and governance of Athens at the time.
She also inserted a layer of Greek mythology into this already well-crafted mix (obviously drawn from their beliefs and customs regarding the gods and from the mythological texts that recount the heroic deeds of their myths).
Through the unfolding of the story and the attempt to solve the mystery of the killing of a foreigner, a member of the Delian League, a league that united Athens and other cities against the Persians, the author tells us about the famous games dedicated to Dionysus, how comedies and tragedies were performed, what actors were employed, and how they were patronized by the city's wealthiest.
Along with this, we also are enlightened about rights and duties of Athenian citizens, the role of slaves (and how it was normal for them to have slaves), the role of women in general and wives in particular (only Athenian women could marry citizens of Athens and enjoy certain rights; foreigners could only be concubines).
____THE CHARACTERS ___
Although, in addition to the main character and a few close co-protagonists, the story features a myriad of other supporting characters (acquaintances, family members, friends, villains, friends of villains, people with brief appearances, and others only mentioned), the author has managed to comprehensively delineate the salient traits of their various personalities.
The descriptions of domestic scenes and the emotional relationships that bind Philocles to his closest family (primarily his companion and concubine and his slave, who was also his best friend) also allowed me to immediately empathize with the protagonist and his loved ones, despite the constant comings and goings of characters appearing throughout the book.
The only thing that could have been a challenge at first (and I admit, it scared me at first, but it easily resolved itself )was the sheer number of Greek names thrown around.
If I initially thought I'd get lost in that river of similar names, all ending in "es" and "tos/os" (Philocles, Menakles, Apollonides, etc., Aristarchos, Stratos, Dados, etc.), actually they entered my mind quite easily and I don't know by what magic or miracle, I managed to remember all the characters without getting confused (perhaps because each character introduced is associated with certain qualities/flaws/roles and actually has a purpose in the whole context).
__ MY ONLY WARNING__
Even if there are no gory scenes and the only sex scene isn't described in detail, it can't be considered a cozy mystery: the language isn't always the most delicate or polite.
There are some serious insults between the characters and a vulgar scene that is painted on Philocles's door to insult him. Plus it looks like in ancient comedy, the presence of fake penises on stage was a great thing to laugh, thus during the performances they will often be mentioned.
___WHY NOT 5 FULL STARS ? ___
The half star I removed is for the author's lack of historical notes at the end of the novel, and lack of single notes that could have been placed in each page at the same points in the book where history and mythology are cited.
Those who are unfamiliar with Greek history and mythology, in fact, is unable to realize what is truthful, what is the author's imagination and what comes from the imagination of the ancient Greek poets.
_____ CONCLUDING :
For me, it's a well-deserved 4.5 stars for the engaging plot, the fluid and light-hearted writing, the likable characters, the author's extensive historical research, and the perfect blend of mystery, history, mythology, investigation, action, and the characters' personal lives.
I want to know more about the adventures of Philocles and his friends, I will definitely read the other 2 books included in this series as well!!
Thanks for reading my opinion and please be lenient with my English for it's not my language.