This book has a good storyline, has likeable (on the whole) main characters and moves along at a decent pace, but is spilt by multiple things, spoilt brat of a leading lady, poor writing, and a complete lack of knowledge of Britsh aristocracy.
This book is primarily set in London during a contagious virus, which seems to be hitting people of all classes indiscriminately. It opens with Lady Jane Curtis, a typical self centred teenager, who is fed up of being restricted to her house and a slightly dull and restricted season. Her mother wanting to keep peace agrees to go to the local market (did the aristocracy really shop at the local market?) where Jane finds an unusual headdress, which she decides to wear on her next night out. All dressed up she arrives with her parents and is introduced to the young Duke of Dalwater, (who is missing his right arm after a hunting accident as a child) by a mutual friend. Jane quickly (as in within 5 minutes) becomes enamoured of him. The mutual friend starts spreading a rumour that Jane is the source of the contagion, in order for the Duke to stop his friendship with Jane, it doesn't work. When
Jane's father decides to move the family to Bath to speed up her mother's recovery, the Duke and his mother follow. But trouble follows, and it just gets worse and worse until Janes father throws her out of the family house and forbids her return.
As this book is so much around a contagious virus, why when someone is ill does everyone crowd into a room with them? Both with Jane's mother, and when her father's brother was dying from consumption?
I have an issue with the title: why is he called the Hellish Duke? he never appears anything other than charming.
My other issue is, (and I accept it may be because of my love of the regency period,) is the errors in how things were done in this period, things like ladies being served port at the dinner table, the incorrect way people are greeted or introduced. The most inaccurate was when Jane was referred to as Typhoid Mary. The story of Typhoid Mary was in the US at the end of the 19th century, but the book it set early in the 1900's from dress etc and most in the UK would not be aware of things that happened in the US outside maybe military matters so this reference is ridiculous.
Added to some truly awful descriptions e.g. 'her hair butter yellow', or 'her hair lay across the pillow like a brown stain', I wonder how some books get published.
I realise to many these are small issues but for me they detract from the book.
Note on second reading I see the reference to typhoid Mary has been removed, or at least I didn't notice it. The book doesn't improve on second reading, suspect I only started it again as it had status of new not read.