-There are many misconceptions that we carry about past periods in history. The history of this country is no different. The background of this United States, how it came to be and why those who braved death to first come on these shores; what our founding fathers believed in and why they worded the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as they did, and why there was a need for a Bill of Rights, are all parts of our history that have been distorted over time.
-Only by examining original documents penned by those same persons who lived in the periods we’re examining, and looking at events that were happening that were occurring at that time, can we begin to understand the intent of the founding fathers when they wrote the documents that form the bedrock of our country.
-The authors have done a tremendous job in dispelling many of the falsehoods that we have come to accept as truth, only because, like a child playing the game of “telephone”, facts have been modified, but in our current time those modifications are being broadcast in order to suit the arguments of those whose agenda runs contrary to that of the original intent of the founders of this country. This book, alongside the book by Mary Grabar, who wrote the highly informative “Dubunking the 1619 Project”, should be required reading for any citizen of this country, and is a vital read for anyone involved in government.
-The primary theme which runs through the entire book is how much our founders, and those who came to this country beginning from the early 17th century, had God as the focus of their lives, and were always governed by biblical teachings.
-We know that there were many people that came to the New World for religious freedom, but we learn here that the major nations of that time, though all under the Christian umbrella, each promoted their own sect to the point that worship of any other branch of Christianity was punished severely. England was governed by the crown and the Anglican Church; France by Catholicism and in Germany, it was the Protestant Church established through Martin Luther.
-Though many examples of the harsh treatment by European governments against those who chose to worship differently are given, the story of William Penn is representative of what people who differed with the state religion went through. William Penn, we learn, was the son of a distinguished military officer, also named William Penn, and who was knighted for his service to the King. When the younger Penn was influenced in college to the Quaker belief, it appeared to him to be a purer form of worship than the official Anglican religion. Though his father tried to protect him, the younger Penn, who now was actively advocating for the Quaker faith, was put into prison but successfully argued for his own release in front of a jury. After the death of Penn’s father, the King sent Penn to the New World and bequeathed land to him (Pennsylvania) in payment of a debt owed to Penn’s father. But the story only begins there.
-Where stories abound of the new settlers stealing land and cheating the natives out of property, Penn believed (in line with the thinking of other northern colonists) that fairness to all peoples was a credo that all had to live by, and he purchased whatever land he was “given” by the crown, sometimes purchasing the same land several times from each of several tribes who all claimed ownership. He was also an advocate for religious freedom, where all people in the lands he controlled were able to worship as they chose.
-Those coming to the New World weren’t just looking for a new land where they could freely worship. The intent, which is repeated in documents by the founding fathers and was incorporated into our founding documents, was preventing a state religion from being established as was prevalent throughout Europe. The Constitutions of each of the founding colonies was based on biblical models, but, as opposed to the practice in Europe, the colonists were granted the freedom to practice religion as they chose.
-Jumping ahead through time, though continuing with the subject of religion, we are exposed to the expression, coined by Thomas Jefferson, “separation of church and state”. But the meaning of that wasn’t the elimination of religion. It was referring to what’s known as the “Establishment Clause”, which states that no state religion shall be established. He was reiterating the ideas which those early colonists wanted as the foundation of this new land, that, though religious morals and guidance was vital for any country to succeed, the government should never control how each citizen was to worship. In Jefferson’s words “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between Church and State.” He was stating that the government may never create an official state religion, nor can the government prohibit the worship of any religion. In the words of the author, this “definitely was not intended to create the type of religion-free public square desired by current activist groups.”
-Joseph Story, a founder of Harvard Law School, a US Supreme Court judge and who “in 1833, penned an authoritative legal commentary on the US Constitution - a work still used today” is quoted as saying “The promulgations (promotion) of the great doctrines of religion - the being, and the attributes, and Providence of one Almighty God; the responsibility to Him for all our actions, founded upon moral accountability; a future state of rewards and punishments; the cultivation of all the personal, social, and benevolent virtues - these never can be a matter of indifference in any well-ordered community. It is, indeed, difficult to conceive, how any civilized society can well exist without them.”
-The author takes us on a tour of the background of our country, dispelling myths about the Boston Tea Party; giving revelations about the many battles for our independence which only by “the finger of God” were we able to be victorious, and the sacrifice and losses that the signers of the Declaration had to endure because of their stand against the British.
-Among the many other subjects which the authors have examined is the slave trade, and like so much of history, can’t be pigeon-holed into a choice of slavery or non-slavery, but is also nuanced. Rather than being denounced as a slave country, the United States pushed for freedom of all people. Frederick Douglass, a former slave himself, is quoted as defending the founders, and gave many proofs that this country was not created to support slavery. Though we now know that slavery is a horrible practice, in the 17th and 18th century it was commonplace throughout the world. Those who came to these shores, though, especially the Pilgrims and Quakers, actively preached against the practice. Documents show that in 1646, when a ship bearing slaves came on their shores, they freed those slaves and arrested the slave owners. Many of the Northern colonies even passed laws prohibiting slavery. In contrast, the Southern colonies, starting with Virginia and being mainly Anglicans, believed that the king would provide for them. When hardship came, they were not prepared to put in the effort as they always expected help to arrive from England, and so, they welcomed slaves who would do the work for them. As compared to the total population, slaves owners were still a small minority.
-Though slavery was present in the south in much greater proportions than in the North, blacks also owned slaves. In fact, it was normal for that time period for people who lost in battle to be taken as slaves by the victors. (Mary Grabar, in her book, “Debunking the 1619 Project”, goes into greater detail on this subject, and presents facts which would be astonishing to those whose only exposure to black history is that presented by organizations like “Black Lives Matter”. ) Many of the first groups of workers that came to this country, though, were actually indentured servants who could win their freedom. The first case of a landowner successfully bringing a case to court, for him to acquire as a slave a man who came here as an indentured servant, was in 1654 where the landowner was a black man (who came to these shores himself as an indentured servant, but who became successful) and who won the right to keep another black man who was an indentured servant as a permanent slave. Slaves then, over time, were held by both whites and blacks. But the writings of most of the founding fathers proved that the majority felt that it was an abhorrent practice that had to be done away with.
-The book is filled with numerous other fascinating areas covered by the authors. In reading this book, I’ve highlighted passages on almost every other page as the book is filled with information I’d never heard before, or had the wrong impression of.
-Other subjects covered are equally interesting, like the story of Columbus, which corrects history’s account of him as killing the natives and being greedy for wealth; the explanation of why so many of our founding fathers who were anti-slavery were prevented from freeing their slaves due to the laws present in the states at that time; the similarities between the Constitution and Bill of Rights and biblical teachings which reveal that our whole government is based on the Bible; etc. In short, it’s a fact filled journey from the time of Columbus to the current time which reveals so much of the history of this country, along with the religious convictions our founders.
-This is such a well documented book and encompasses so many facets of our early era, that it would be a point of reference for anyone’s library, and is especially important in the face of the many liberals and progressives who downplay the role that religion has always played in our nation’s founding and continued success, and who have distorted the legacy of the great men who founded this country.