An eye-opening portrait of global capitalism spanning 150 years, told through the history of the Tata corporation.
Nearly a century old, the grand façade of Bombay House is hard to miss in the historic business district of Mumbai. This is the iconic global headquarters of the Tata Group, a multinational corporation that produces everything from salt to software. After getting their start in the cotton and opium trades, the Tatas, a Parsi family from Navsari, Gujarat, ascended to commanding heights in the Indian economy by the time of independence in 1947. Over the course of its 150-year history Tata spun textiles, forged steel, generated hydroelectric power, and took to the skies. It also faced challenges from restive workers fighting for their rights and political leaders who sought to curb its power.
In this sweeping history, Mircea Raianu tracks the fortunes of a family-run business that was born during the high noon of the British Empire and went on to capture the world’s attention with the headline-making acquisition of luxury car manufacturer Jaguar Land Rover. The growth of Tata was a complex process shaped by world historical forces: the eclipse of imperial free trade, the intertwined rise of nationalism and the developmental state, and finally the return of globalization and market liberalization. Today Tata is the leading light of one of the world’s major economies, selling steel, chemicals, food, financial services, and nearly everything else, while operating philanthropic institutions that channel expert knowledge in fields such as engineering and medicine.
Based on painstaking research in the company’s archive, Tata elucidates how a titan of industry was created and what lessons its story may hold for the future of global capitalism.
Raianu's work on Tatas is an eye opening piece, the book pierces the veil of mythology that shrouds the Tatas, a story intertwined with Indian nationalism. The book demonstrates how Tatas balanced the increasing nationalistic sentiments regarding industry and their role in the freedom movement and the realities of British industrial policy and the pursuit of Capital and Profit.
I was expecting a book similar to Nike Shoedog , giving insights into the growth and challenges faced by the Tara’s. However this book was more like an academic journal . Pretty much a collection of facts . The sentences were very convoluted and certainly this was not an enjoyable or easy read . The author has out in significant time doing research though .
Mircea Raianu’s Tata: The Global Corporation That Built Indian Capitalism (Harvard University Press, 2021) is not your usual corporate hagiography.
Where popular business biographies often lean on anecdotes of charismatic leadership or moments of high-stakes dealmaking, Raianu offers something more rigorous, more archival, and frankly, more unsettling at times: a scholarly excavation of how the Tata Group, one of India’s most iconic conglomerates, grew alongside and often in tension with the very history of Indian capitalism itself.
At just over 300 pages, the book is compact but dense, weaving together corporate records, colonial-era archives, philanthropic documents, and postcolonial business histories.
Raianu is a historian of global capitalism, and that perspective shows—his Tata is not simply the “salt-to-software” success story beloved in public memory, but an institution deeply entangled in questions of labor, politics, philanthropy, and nationalism.
The book begins in the late 19th century, when Jamsetji Tata’s ventures in textiles, hotels, and nascent steel dreams emerged in the shadow of colonial control. Where Russi Lala’s older works on the Tatas (like Creation of Wealth) often frame Jamsetji as a lone visionary, Raianu situates him in the wider context of colonial economic structures—highlighting how Tata’s ambitions were both constrained by British imperial oversight and paradoxically enabled by colonial networks of finance and trade.
From there, Raianu moves through the 20th century, tracing the expansion into steel, power, chemicals, and consumer industries. He is especially attentive to the Group’s hybrid model of capitalism—what he calls “embedded liberalism”.
The Tatas were never pure market actors; their businesses were tied to philanthropy, trusts, and nationalist rhetoric. Tata Steel’s Jamshedpur was not just a factory town, but a social experiment in corporate paternalism. The Tata Trusts, which continue to channel profits into education and healthcare, created a form of capitalism where accumulation and redistribution were structurally bound together.
One of the strengths of this book is its handling of politics. Raianu shows how the Tatas negotiated the nationalist movement, often positioning themselves as allies of Indian self-strengthening while still operating within—and benefiting from—the structures of empire.
After independence, they adapted again, embedding themselves in the state-led industrialisation of Nehru’s India. What emerges is a portrait of a corporation that was less a passive reflection of Indian capitalism and more one of its architects.
Importantly, Raianu resists the temptation to make this a triumphalist story. While the Tata narrative is often held up as an exemplar of ethical capitalism, the book surfaces tensions: paternalism in labour relations, the ways philanthropy also reinforced elite control, and how the Group’s nationalist ethos sometimes masked its reliance on state privilege. He doesn’t demonise, but neither does he glorify—he historicises, which makes this a richer contribution than either celebratory or critical takes alone.
Where some readers may feel a gap is in the book’s timeline. Raianu’s focus is firmly on the colonial and early postcolonial periods, and while he gestures at the Group’s neoliberal turn and global acquisitions, he does not dwell on TCS, Tetley, Corus, or Jaguar Land Rover.
For readers curious about “modern” Tata—the IT revolution, Ratan Tata’s global buying spree, or the Cyrus Mistry controversy—this book won’t deliver. But in fairness, Raianu is clear about his project: this is history, not contemporary reportage. To understand today’s Tata, he argues, you must first understand the foundations on which it was built.
The tone throughout is measured, analytical, and careful. It’s not a page-turner in the style of popular nonfiction, but it is highly readable for an academic work. Raianu’s prose avoids jargon while still making sophisticated arguments, and he anchors his analysis in vivid episodes—whether it’s the building of Jamshedpur, the negotiations with colonial authorities, or the philanthropic ventures that doubled as soft power.
Ultimately, Tata: The Global Corporation That Built Indian Capitalism earns its place as one of the most serious studies of Indian business history to date. For entrepreneurs, it offers a reminder that business empires are not just about profits and brands but about structures, ideologies, and responsibilities.
For scholars, it situates Tata within the global history of capitalism, showing how an Indian corporation helped shape—and was shaped by—both empire and nation. And for general readers, it complicates the feel-good narrative: yes, Tata is a story of vision and philanthropy, but also of power, privilege, and the messy entanglements of capitalism itself.
In a bookshelf crowded with celebratory accounts of Indian business success, Raianu’s book stands out precisely because it is not celebratory.
It is rigorous, grounded, and above all, necessary for anyone who wants to see beyond the surface sheen of the Tata story.