I picked up this book after enjoying the author’s blog, “Passport to Dreams Old and New,” for several years and can confirm that it does not disappoint.
My favorite thing about this book was the author’s rigorous treatment of primary and secondary sources. Every time she drew a conclusion from a primary source such as a ride blueprint, it was clear what information the source had held and what she had synthesized. Likewise, when discussing secondary sources, the author was careful to note when those sources themselves could potentially be incorrect and why different secondary sources sometimes disagreed with each other. This is a level of rigor that is usually absent in other “commercial archaeology” books, which usually do nothing more than copy other secondary sources without providing a very detailed citation. I was very happy to see that this book went in the opposite direction.
About 2/3 of the content of the book is trivia and history about the Haunted Mansion rides at Disneyland and Walt Disney World (with the Disney World ride getting over 90% of the attention). This trivia and history differs from what is presented in most Disney park “fun facts” books in that all of it is rigorously sourced and usually analyzed for some kind of intent on the part of the ride designers. This brings me to the other 1/3 of the book, which is critical analysis of the Haunted Mansion ride experience written in the same style as analysis of a more traditional piece of art such as a movie or painting. I admit that these sections of the book didn’t always interest me as much. For example, the author presented a theory at one point that the monstrous clock in the Haunted Mansion has an especially scary effect because, throughout the rest of the theme park, we’ve seen clocks as symbols of reassurance in places like the Main Street train station and “it’s a small world.” Well, that sounds like it could be true, but how could you prove that effect was actually taking place in the minds of even 10% of the people on the ride? However, the same kind of arguments show up in analyses of classic movies, paintings, books, etc. So I don’t really hold it against the author for treating this theme park ride the same way any other classic work of art gets treated, even if I personally have trouble getting invested in such things.
The author gives a disclaimer at the beginning that this book isn’t meant as an introduction to the Haunted Mansion, but is more for the experienced fan. I realized after reading it that I would have benefited from a read through the “Haunted Mansion” Wikipedia article beforehand, just as a refresher of exactly how many Haunted Mansion rides there are, when they were built, and who the major figures involved were. This information is all referenced in the book, but some familiarity with it is expected.