I think I'm becoming a jaded supernatural mystery reader.
If I had read this one four or five years ago it probably would have been a 4 or 5 star read. Now it's just barely a 3.
It's not that Under the Lake was that awful, it's just that when you quote Stephen King on the cover saying that the book "scared the hell" out of him, you better have one mother fucking scary-ass book on your hands. Or else you paid Stephen King to lie.
I think someone paid Stephen King to lie. I'd rather believe that ugly fact than believe Stephen King is a pussy. Because to have nightmares because you read this novel (a fact that Stephen states in his praise inside the cover) you would pretty much have to be a pussy. Or a liar. I choose to believe, in this case, that liar fits the bill.
This was a really weak attempt at a ghost story. At some point in the beginning, some characters decide to hold a seance. And some spooky things happen, but things that don't even scare the characters as much as intrigue them. If your characters aren't terrified, how do you expect to spook your readers?
Under the Lake is more of a southern detective mystery. There are some really formulaic events which you could read in any mystery, some family secrets that all get wrapped up a little too cleanly, and characters that speak and behave exactly as one would expect. I think I guessed most of the ending at the halfway point, but that being said, I still read the last 130 pages or so in one sitting, late at night before bed.
To put it in layman's terms, I can sum up my response to this "thriller" as one big fat "eh, I liked it. It was entertaining."
And entertaining it is. If you can get past the fact that it isn't really a scary ghost story. The plot centers around a journalist who used to be pretty cutting-edge who has basically just sold out who stays at his brother-in-law's lake house in a cryptic little town which obviously doesn't get, or want, many visitors. He finds a young, oversexed undercover reporter he used to work with in the local sheriff's office sniffing out a rumor that the sheriff is dirty. The two of them join forces (and bodies) as they crack open some long-buried mysteries about the lake and the town itself, and (believe it or not) everything pretty much works out in the end. The "bad" guys lose or die and the "good" guys bring the truth to light, expose corruption, save the day, and go on with their lives. I personally believe the whole ghost story scenario was thrown haphazardly into the plot in order for the author to dig himself out of a gigantic plot hole. Because ghosts can do anything, right?
The characters are bland, and for the most part, their motivations are unbelievable. There were even some that were thrown in for apparently no reason at all (the blind psychic named Joyce points everyone in the direction of the lake house ghost who just so happens to have a sister named Joyce who is also blind--but this is all coincidence....mmhmm yeah) The only characters I kind of grew on were the Kelly family, a mystic incest-laced family from the valley with supernatural abilities and powers. No mention is ever made to why they have powers--they can just see the future, have healing abilities, and the ability to read minds--again for no apparent reason whatsoever. I would have liked to see their stories and characters fleshed out a bit more because that could have been an interesting side-plot to me.
Read this book if you like a good mystery and are going to be sitting on the beach in the near future. It's a great plane ride/beach read--quick, easy, and mildly entertaining. If you want to be scared, go read The Shining.