Dustin Kidd's Pop Culture Freaks has some important ideas in it, and some interesting data.
Does who you are affect how you interpret pop culture? Does pop culture influence your image of yourself and how you think about where you fit in the world? Does the identity of people who create pop culture affect what is produced?
Yes, yes, and yes. ;)
At least, intuitively, that would all seem to be true.
It's especially true in fandom and for geeks like me, where a large part of someone's total identity can be defined by pop culture. When someone is a "gamer" or a "Trekkie" (or "Trekker"...let's not get started on that) or a "Browncoat", the implication is that it defines their lives in ways outside of when they are simply indulging in recreation.
The issue with a book like Pop Culture Freaks is that it needs to both make an assertion like that, prove it scientifically...and still be anecdotal enough to hold the reader's interest.
I would say that each of the sections of the book could have been ten times the length and served the topic better.
For example, in discussing race, analyses are done on the races of people based on their IMDb (Internet Movie Database) information. It's stated that there is some standard protocol for doing that, but I don't understand that at all.
If you have someone without a picture, you certainly can't reliably base it just on name, especially for people living in cultures where taking your partner's last name is common. We probably all work with people whose names are commonly associated with one race when they are of another.
What Kidd doesn't do is explain just how that is done...I would have liked to have seen that in detail, so I could judge for myself how reliable it was. If there were studies showing that using that technique identified people as well as: seeing photographs; self identification; and/or other's assessments (I suppose DNA could be included), that would have been wonderful.
For me, Kidd's work just doesn't strike that necessary balance between what we know and how we know it.
That said, I did enjoy reading it. Here are a few of the stories which intrigued me:
* Two groups of people (of specific types) both liking the same movie, but interpreting it very differently...one group thinking it was a realistic depiction of the past, and another thinking it was funny
* People of different social strata reacting to Lucy Ricardo very differently: intelligent pioneer, or dangerous deviant?
* The idea that the experience of superheroes may socially parallel that of people with "disabilities"
* The parallel of Harry Potter to the migrant worker experience (most of the year living in very difficult circumstances, then going somewhere which is supposed to be wonderful but from which you are still somewhat socially isolated because of your background), and how that helped teachers working with students who were learning English as a second language
A book full of anecdotes like that would be fascinating. A book explaining in depth why one of the anecdotes was true would be fascinating. Unfortunately, for me, Pop Culture Freaks was a hybrid that wasn't quite enough of either.