Rage is based on 17 interviews that Bob Woodward conducted with President Trump over seven turbulent months of 2020. But it is more than just the substance of these interviews, Woodward also spoke with past and present members of the Trump administration. The title relates to statements Trump made about himself and relationships with other people. “I bring rage out. I do bring rage out. I always have. I don’t know if that’s an asset or a liability, but whatever it is, I do.” Rage is probably not a good book for avid fans of President Trump. In fact, it may have even contributed to his loss of the 2020 election. The headline after Rage was published was that President Trump knew about the deadly virulence of the Covid-19 virus as early as January 2020 and that he lied to the people of the U.S. That statement is somewhat disingenuous. In January, February, and even into March of 2020 the President’s advisors and global experts held mixed opinions about the pandemic. In the U.S. and around the world, leaders were presenting an optimistic face to the public. The “lie” is based on statements from national security advisors, not the medical experts, and Trump’s statement that “There’s dynamite behind every door.” It could be argued that Trump was his own strongest advocate and worst enemy in the communications department. In the Epilogue Woodward notes that in 12 years as President FDR gave 30 fireside chats. Aids and people wanted more, but he said it was important to limit his talks to major events. In a calm and reassuring voice, FDR explained the problem and what the government was doing about it. Compare that with Trump’s non-stop tweets! In Trump’s case, less would have been more. While much of Rage is dedicated to Trump’s management of the pandemic, it also covers international relationships. I found the on-again-off-again relationship with Kim Jong Un most interesting, but several others – Russia, China, Israel – are touched upon as well. The rambling interviews between the President and Woodward offer a glimpse into the Trump’s mind and maybe even, this isn’t too much of a stretch, his soul. So much, so much of his conversations relate to himself – his ratings and poll numbers, how he is ganged upon by the media and Democrats, how he is accomplishing things never achieved before, etc., etc. When asked serious questions by Woodward, over and over again he circles back to himself. The author concludes “that Trump’s presidency was riddled with ambivalence, set on an uncertain course, swinging from combativeness to reconciliation, and whipsawing from one statement or action to the opposite.” Woodward notes some of Trump’s successes, particularly on the economy, but even some successes against the spreading virus and pandemic. Still, it was not surprising that the final lines of Rage are: “when his performance as president is taken in its entirety, I can say only reach one conclusion” Trump is the wrong man for the job.”