Cheatingland follows years of interviews and research from its anonymous author and delves into the hows and whys of men who cheat, though the author did include some anecdotes from women as well.
This book read very similiarly to a research study but was significantly less formal. The start of the book felt like a discussion into methodology, to a certain extent, followed by multiple chapters that could've been described as the discussion part of a formal research study, which discussed the larger results and what it all meant. The vast majority of the book was focused on the cheaters' voices themselves. So the author would make a claim (such as being able to break down a cheater profile into 5 types) and then would follow up with examples of what those men (and some women) had said that proved that claim.
I found the book to be fairly insightful, but I felt that there was some heavy bias that revealed itself strongly in the beginning from the point of the author. The author would make opinionated statements that were disguised as something else maybe in an attempt to side with the audience rather than truly empathize with the interviewee (like saying, you might think that this individual sounds like a monster ... or something along those lines) to which he would then acknowledge that he had a hard time not judging these people but then also had to strategically make them feel comfortable so they would talk. So he came across as incredibly judgemental but chose to not vocalize those things with the people who he talked with so they would trust him and share with him. In my mind, that felt almost as monsterous, and it made it feel that the author didn't so much as really care about these individuals but simply wanted to do this research for his own curiousity -all a means to an end. It felt like he was telling himself and asking the audience to stomach through it because then they'd at least get a better understanding of these people by the end of it, and maybe that would be worth it. I found that lack of empathy to be really unfortunate.
Secondly, the author mostly seemed to focus on the majority of men in the study and how they responded to things rather than to also acknowledge the minority outliers. For instance, he mentioned many times that the majority of men did not have a strong emotional relationship with their affair partner, yet in saying so, he acknowledged that there were outliers to that statement but then never expanded on those. There were many more instances of this and I wish that, as in a formal research study, the minority situations would also have been shared, if not simply for the purpose of also showing that affairs can be incredibly complicated in the emotional and relationship realms. In many instances, it felt as if the author was sharing the results of the study through discussion but in a way that focused only on the results he wanted to show and to come to the conclusion he wanted to draw. I would have preferred a more transparent discussion that revealed all the results and then drew some connections, even if those connections weren't as supportive for the ultimate conclusion the author wanted to draw.
Lastly, the book came to a very abrupt end, leaving us with a few words from one of the participants that related to the current chapter. I felt like I was hitting a wall that I didn't expect to hit all of a sudden. I hit the end of the chapter and end pages and that was all. I wish there had been strong bibliographic information at the end providing research that had to have been consulted through the process, as well as professionals that were interviewed that the author mentioned throughout the text.
While I think this book offers up some interesting preliminary information on men (and some women) who cheat, this discussion of this "study" feels somewhat loose, not as professionally done, lacking in citable research to validate some of the author's findings (though I realize the individuals who participated were meant to be kept anonymous and in that aspect, we're out of luck), and ultimately at times felt a bit more anecdotal with the author's own personal conclusions driving the story (however valid or not). While I do not seem to disagree with much of what he had to say, I do believe that he was sharing a certain vision of what he wanted to present to his audience rather than sharing the entire picture (sharing results with those that didn't fit with the majority, briefly discussing those who didn't fit the mold or classic profile, etc.). I did find the information to be informative and interesting, though it left me with more questions, and I do think that, especially for those who have been in a situation where they have been cheated on, have been the cheater, or have been involved as an affair partner, this book will help provide a glimpse of greater understanding into the thought processes there.