THE CONTROVERSIAL HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE ADVOCATE SPEAKS OUT
Simone Gold is an emergency physician, who became famous for her opposition to the COVID-related ‘shutdown’ in 2020 and later.
She wrote in the first chapter of this 2020 book, “on March 13, President Trump declared a national emergency, directing … a massive intergovernmental effort to contain the spread [of the Coronavirus]… Not long afterwards I started seeing my first COVID patients. The question in my mind was how to provide the most effective care given the uncertainty of the moment… The common antimalarial drug called hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) had been shown o be effective against the first SARS outbreak close to two decades ago. Could work now, I wondered?... I was excited about its treatment possibilities for COVID-19… My first confirmed positive patient was a woman in her fifties… She was the perfect outpatient candidate for hydroxychloroquine. Let’s call her Patient One.” (Pg. 4-5)
She continues, “Some of my colleagues were skeptical; most were indifferent. I didn’t share their premises… As far as I was concerned, hydroxychloroquine worked, and at worst could do no harm… I discharged Patient One the same day with instructions to follow up. Within twenty-four hours her condition dramatically improved … The literature and the doctors I followed had been right! Innovation backed by scientific evidence had helped her. I was thrilled. The day after I got the good news about Patient One, the hospital’s medical director called… This felt like an interrogation… He began by insisting… that in his opinion he didn’t think its use was justified… I countered with facts… The hospital had treated an infected patient with a common, safe, effective drug and she recovered. I had expected to get kudos. Instead I was met with hostility… He flat-out told me I was irritating the powerful consortium affiliated with our hospital… it seemed that the business of medicine was taking priority over the practice of patient care… [He] basically said he would fire me if I ever gave HCQ to an outpatient again. It was the strangest encounter I had ever had with a medical colleague… Unfortunately, it wouldn’t be the last.” (Pg. 7-10)
She goes on, “I kept on prescribing hydroxychloroquine and zinc as a COVID-19 treatment to the confirmed-positive cases I saw. Over the next six weeks I treated around ten patients with HCQ. Just like my first case, their conditions improved. The ‘anecdotal evidence’ that some people mocked wasn’t anecdotal to me… Then came a sudden and nonsensical reversal. The CDC announced on April 7 that there were not approved drugs to treat COVID-19… It was downright bizarre to single out HCQ like this, I thought. I began to suspect some kind of behind-the-scenes decision had been made to sideline the drug.” (Pg. 13-14)
She points out, “The Lancet, a British medical journal, linked HCQ with heartbeat irregularities as part of a dubious study that was later discredited… My hunch was right; as it turned out, The Lancet study was a fake. The fraudulent research… was carried out by a tiny company called Surgisphere… At the time of the research in question, Surgisphere had only six employees, including a science fiction writer and another billing herself as an adult model and events hostess… Less than two weeks after its findings went public, The Lancet retracted its HCQ study… Around the same time … a study in The New England Journal of Medicine was published… This too was retracted after the NEJM admitted it could not account for the underlying research.” (Pg. 14-16)
She states, “There was a total absence of debate grounded in science and evidence… I concluded that the majority of doctors simply felt they needed to keep their heads down, and that’s much easier to do if you don’t think too hard about what you are doing.” (Pg. 18-19) She adds, “I was never one to go along… I wasn’t about to start now. Little did I know that… Big Tech would work overtime to censor me and Big Media would go into hyper-overdrive to defame me.” (Pg. 20)
She says, “The AMA had put its considerable thumb on the scale and come out against prescribing hydroxychloroquine---a drug which I knew to be safe and effective in treating COVID-19. The voice of the scientific-medical establishment had spoken, and once again many of my colleagues had simply fallen in line… Though I was on friendly terms with many of these doctors, I would soon be forced to recalibrate my view of them.” (Pg. 24-25)
She recounts, “I knew I had to act. I also knew I couldn’t act alone. I needed a group of passionate, like-minded physicians who had also been blocked from participating in the national debate. After two weeks’ [work]… I had assembled a large group of other silenced doctors: frontline physicians from many specialties… All of them cold attest that the lockdown-cure for coronavirus had been worse than the disease.” (Pg. 31) Later, she adds, “I had begun seeking out doctors who shared my commitment to science the truth. I wanted Americans to have the ability to make up their own minds about HCQ, the lockdowns, and masks without government interference, media influence, and social media scolding.” (Pg. 34)
She recalls, “I had planned the America’s Frontline Doctors White Coat Summit for July 27… We intended to fight on behalf of physicians who had been reprimanded or fired for prescribing HCQ… and provide timely and actionable information to ordinary people…The seven-hour AFLDS education summit featured around eighteen of us… the streaming educational sessions … ended up being overshadowed by the press conference we conducted during a break… on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court… Here were doctors, many of them distinguished in their fields, talking directly to the American public… [who were] as sick as I was of the Big Tech censorship… and disinformation from both the national establishment and media… President Trump shared the video multiple times … Other influencers did the same. I was totally unprepared for what would happen next.” (Pg. 38-40)
She records, “‘We’ve removed this video for sharing false information about cures and treatments for COVID-19,’ Facebook said… Twitter censored the video in similar fashion. YouTube took down our video, too. So did Instagram…. Now America’s Frontline Doctors was being silenced as well… The next day… I was contacted by one of the hospitals where I worked… I had appeared in an ‘embarrassing video’ and I could no longer work there… To my shock, I had been fired out of hand.” (Pg. 40-41) Later, she adds, “(It was highly ironic that one of our educational sessions was on medical cancel culture)… If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone.” (Pg. 43)
She criticizes “Dr. [Anthony] Fauci’s blatantly unscientific statements during an interview… ‘On trials that are valid, that were randomized and controlled in the proper way, all of these trials show consistently that hydroxychloroquine is no effective in the treatment of … COVID-19.’ The comments came a day after President Trump reiterated his support for the drug… Fauci has repeatedly contradicted himself and has been consistently inaccurate on a massive scale, and I welcomed President Trump adding new members with different perspectives to the Task Force, which ultimately he did.” (Pg. 44-45)
She wonders, “What was driving these various sources of influence and power---medicine, government, technology, and media---to limit the public’s access to a safe and effective generic drug sold like vitamins in countries outside the United States? I came to view it as a nexus of the malign effects of politicized science, the profit motive, and the politics of fear.” (Pg. 65) Later, she adds, “Telling doctors they can’t use an off-label, FDA-approved drug to treat patients is un unprecedented power grab and in essence practicing medicine without a license.” (Pg. 71)
She advises, “Stop being afraid of everyday interactions due to COVID. Return to a healthy social life. Go out with friends or enjoy time with your family. If you’re a religious person, renew your spiritual commitments by attending a local house of worship. Most importantly, be grateful that we still live in a free country where these rights are protected by our Constitution. Do these things while being mindful about your overall risk in all health issues.” (Pg. 73) She concludes, “any conclusion that results in limiting your freedom must have a very high level of proof… All the lockdowns, closed businesses, closed schools, closed churches, masks, not being able to see your relatives---all of these things infringe on your freedom… when a politician suggests any solution that reduces freedom, you must require a very high level of proof.” (Pg. 80)
Ms. Gold was, of course, arrested after the January 6th invasion of the Capitol building. (She and Frontline Doctors Communication Director John Strand were identified by FBI ‘wanted’ pictures of protestors inside the Capitol building.) She has now said, “I do regret being there,” claiming she feared it would harm her work the Frontline Doctors.
While this book is a fascinating insight into her psychology, and she does make an occasional valid point (e.g., the discredited Lancet and NEJM papers), I don’t think subsequent events have borne out her opinions. (E.g., shouldn’t nations where hydroxychloroquine can be freely used have LOWER rates of coronavirus infection? Shouldn’t fervent ‘anti-maskers’ who become infected die at much lower rates than others?) And her participation in the attempted ‘takeover’ of the Capitol building has, for me, permanently self-identified her as an ideologue, not simply an objective scientist seeking truth and freedom.