What do you think?
Rate this book


Audiobook
First published August 25, 2020

I read this book because there was a talk/panel about it for the virtual Eden Mills Writing Festival. I have read a couple of other novels by Thomas King, and I honestly found them very hit or miss. I enjoyed Indians on Vacation. It’s more character-driven than plot-driven, but there is enough that happens to make the novel memorable.
It analyzed many issues found in Canada and throughout the world. It shows struggles with mental health and coping mechanisms. It also reflects some of the atrocities committed towards various indigenous tribes in the past, and some still occur today. These subjects are all subtly weaved into the novel while following Bird and Mimi on their vacation to Prague.
I’ve never been to Prague, but the novel makes it sound stunning and strange at the same time. I have moved Prague higher up on my list of places to explore around the world. I am a Guelphite. So hearing references to my town was so fun and left me with a warm and cozy feeling, and King described Guelph perfectly. He captured the atmosphere and favourite hometown spots.
When I first started reading this, I didn’t know how I felt about jumping back and forth between Prague and the past stories. I got used to it and found I was looking forward to both sides of the story. The next significant observation I had was that I thought Bird and Mimi were in a toxic relationship. I was frustrated when she wouldn’t have breakfast with Bird. I often thought, why did Bird go to Prague if he doesn’t want to do anything? I felt like I was more similar in that I do like to be in my cozy home with my comforts in the City that I love. However, while I’m on vacation, I usually am the planner. I have everything written out and a flawless schedule. Maybe this is why I don’t travel much.
As the book continued, I liked Mimi and Bird’s relationship. It seemed real. The way they communicated made them seem like any couple you would see on the street. They were comfortable with each other and seemed to harbour resentment in some moments. At the end of the book, one thing is so apparent: they genuinely love each other.
I liked the personification of his thoughts and feelings. Because there were only two main characters in the novel, I thought his “demons” added variety. The book didn’t become monotonous. I believe I pin-pointed what each demon represented, except for Chip. I figured Eugene was disappointment, and Kitty was anxiety or extreme, irrational thoughts; the twins were depression. I thought maybe Chip was competition; he is often brought up concerning sports or movement. But, I don’t see Bird as an overly competitive person.
The last point I want to raise is: Was Oz another “demon,” or was he a real person? I can’t decide. If he is a demon, he would be happiness, which is why he isn’t present with the other demons. I notice that he is never present when Mimi is, and he seems always to be hopeful and happy. Oz was probably my favourite character. He reminded me a lot of Wednesday in American Gods with some of his statements and mannerisms.
Overall, I recommend this book. I love supporting local authors and will continue to read King’s novels in the future.