Is it Justification by Faith or is the church still reformed by all Five Solas?
I love this brother. I read this book and spent over a month considering its contents. It is curious to me that the solution of ethnic disunity is a proper application of Justification by faith alone, without the additional Solas of the Reformation.
For instance, Justification by Grace through Faith brings instant unity to all who stand equally guilty before the Lord (Rom 3:23; Gal 3:10), prohibits anyone from achieving God's favor in any way (Rom 9:16; Titus 3:5), and imputes our wicked lives to Christ who bore the full penalty due us (2 Cor 5:21). It is Justification by grace through Faith that levels the playing field, making us all equal -since "there is none who seeks for God" (Rom 3:11).
Shai says the solution is "a proper application of justification by faith alone." The book is titled The New Reformation. Curious to me that he leaves out the other 4 Solas, which as a whole, continues to reform the church. When I say the church, I mean scripture recognizes that not everyone who identifies externally or associates themself with the church is a true believer (Matt 7:21-23; 13:24-30; Jude 4). There are false teachers who deliberately seek to threaten the church from within (Matt 7:15; Mark 13:22; 2 Pet 2:1; 1 Jn 4:1; Jude 3-4; Acts 20:29-30; Gal 1:6-9; Titus 1:16).
The churches that tolerate false teaching are "apostate" (Rev 2:20-24; 3:1-4). By contrast, the true church submits to the authority of God's word and upholds the truth of His gospel. This is the church that is still being reformed today by Sola Scriptura. But, leave out Sola Scriptura from the anecdote to any problem and the church is subject to an adding to, subtraction from, or an editing of the only source that holds the key to helping us with our deepest problems, and opens the church up to critical academics.
Sola Gratia is a big one to leave out because justification is not exclusively through faith alone (as Shai stipulated), but by divine grace alone. The implications of which destroy all finger-pointing and shaming, and manipulation to earn favor with man, since that person has been cloaked in the flawless righteousness of Christ. It's really hard to find fault with the church as a whole when the infinitely perfect righteousness of Christ has been imputed to the account of each true believer.
By leaving out Sola Gloria it's easier to focus in on self-preoccupation and the repeated failures of others.
Shai doesn't exclude Sola Fide which keeps the church from introducing a requirement for (or can let slip in) works that negates salvation -the means by which anyone has ever been made right with God. His solution, after all, is a "proper application" of justification by faith alone. But, unlike the Sola Fide of the biblical Reformation, Shai includes "an exhortation for us to acknowledge our own ethnic sins," (pg 147) with lots of quotes by Tim Keller, and, a call for us "to call out the ethnic sins of our own group" (pg 149).
Neither is it the heart of the gospel to embrace guilt of a group's sins, it is also in the opposite direction of salvation by faith. It's the soul that sins that shall die (Ezekiel 18:4). For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast (Eph 2:8-9).
He explains what "The New Reformation" should look like anecdotally on page 212-214. Some of the things he mentions are Christians that "should be as familiar with Jackie-Hill-Perry" (who holds the same position on sexuality as Revoice) "as Isaac Watts." Shai explains that The new Reformation should look like "gospel-saturated, theologically astute women...building up the body of Christ." I had to ask myself, is this not already happening? Or is he speaking about women pastors?? He doesn't clarify, but it's something he envisions. "The New Reformation," he says, "is systematic and biblical theologies by African and Asian pastors and scholars included in the curriculums of seminaries and Bible colleges in the US and the UK." Does he mean they should include Cone, or, should they be included by academic merit? He doesn't say. It's "caring for the...marginalized without regard to how the surrounding secular society categorizes those particular concerns politically," which Shai explains he learned to articulate from reading Tim Keller. The New Reformation "is diverse," he says, "...Republican and Democrat..." (pg 214)
At some point in the book Shai explains how he used to be part of a predominantly White church but is now part of a church where he goes on to give specific percentages of how many blacks, whites, and brown people are in the congregation. Someone did a headcount. The black category is dominant. But, so unhelpful, as, we're all shades of brown. He refers to blacks, whites, and brown people as different ethnicities, which is almost often not the case -most of us are Americans. Which leads to an over-arching error of the whole book. For Christians, our unity reaches past cultural differences. Our unity is not something we manufacture, but something that exists supernaturally as we are indwelt by the same Spirit. We ARE ONE in Christ, which is just as mind-blowing today as it would have been for the church at Ephesus, Jew and Gentile standing side by side before God IN Jesus. Just making distinctions among us by the shade of our skin can't exist in a mind that embraces Colossians 3:5-17. One thought will reject the other, both cannot exist simultaneously in the same mind.
As Christians, we don't have unique struggles, we share the same struggles (1 Cor 10:13) and are able to carry each other’s burdens as we journey through this life; by which we are also comforted by one Savior (2 Cor 1:3-5). The church’s unity is spiritual - it can't be manufactured by people -it's the supernatural result of the creative work of the Holy Spirit. Where there are real and legitimate complaints like the Colossians experienced with Barbarian and Scythian (the worst of the worst), now IN Christ, in the same church, love is the perfect bond. Why have a lesser solution when we have the complete or perfect bond?
Their solution is our solution is God's solution -not a Third solution --not a "Third Way" --but God's way is, "Put on then, as God's chosen ones, holy and beloved, compassionate hearts, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience, bearing with one another and, if one has a complaint against another, forgiving each other; as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive. And above all these put on love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony. And let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, to which indeed you were called in one body. And be thankful." (Col. 3:12-16).