Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

汤因比论汤因比

Rate this book
1972—1973年间,英国“自由欧洲”电台播出了一组广播对话节目。对话双方,一位是电台播音员厄本,另一位便是被誉为“国际性智者”的著名历史家汤因比。对话以生动的言辞、敏感的话题、独到的见地,谈古论今,纵论时势,引起当时世界各地关注。

本书即是在汤因比与厄本的广播对话记录稿的基础上整理而成的。由于意识形态上的隔阂和认识上的片面,汤因比对战后东欧、前苏联以及中国的某些看法未免失之偏颇,但汤因比对历史本质的认识、研究历史的方法以及他的一些见解,确实发人深省。

151 pages, Paperback

First published February 21, 1974

1 person is currently reading
61 people want to read

About the author

Arnold J. Toynbee

692 books521 followers
Not the same as Arnold Toynbee, economist and nephew of Arnold Joseph Toynbee

British educator Arnold Joseph Toynbee noted cyclical patterns in the growth and decline of civilizations for his 12-volume Study of History (1934-1961).

He went to Winchester college and Balliol college, Oxford.

During both world wars, he worked for the foreign office. He additionally published Nationality and the War (1915), The Armenian Atrocities: The Murder of a Nation (1915), The German Terror in France: An Historical Record (1917), and Turkey, a Past and a Future (1917). He attended the peace conference of Paris in 1919 as a delegate.

From 1919 to 1924, Arnold J. Toynbee served as professor of modern Greek and Byzantine at King's college, London. From 1925, Oxford University Press published The Survey of International Affairs under the auspices of the royal institute of international affairs, and Toynbee, professor, oversaw the publication. From 1925, Toynbee served as research professor and director at the royal institute of international affairs. He published The Conduct of British Empire Foreign Relations since the Peace Settlement (1928).

His first marriage to Rosalind Murray produced three sons and ended in divorce in 1946. Toynbee, professor, then married Veronica M. Boulter, his research assistant. He published Civilization on Trial (1948).

Toynbee served as research professor and director at the royal institute of international affairs until 1955.
People published best known lectures of Toynbee, professor, in memory of Adam Gifford as An Historian's Approach to Religion (1956). His massive work examined development and decay. He presented the rise and fall rather than nation-states or ethnic groups. According to his analysis, the welfare depends on ability to deal successfully with challenges.

He also published Democracy in the Atomic Age (1957), Christianity among the Religions of the World (1958), and Between Niger and Nile (1965).

He died in York, North Yorkshire, England.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (11%)
4 stars
13 (76%)
3 stars
1 (5%)
2 stars
1 (5%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Mehdii.
Author 136 books26 followers
August 29, 2020
از پیشگفتارِ کتاب:
منشأ این کتابِ کوچک دوازده گفت و شنود رادیویی است که دکتر توین بی و من برای برنامه "رادیو اروپایِ آزاد" ضبط کردیم و اینک با همکاری محبت آمیزِ آن رادیو منتشر می شود.

احتمالاً بعد از خوندنِ این کتاب با دیدِ جدید و بهتری سراغ کتاب های تاریخی میرید.
اطلاعات توین بی از تاریخ و فلسفه ی تاریخ بی نظیره و از اون بهتر تحلیل هایی هست که از یک اتفاق تاریخی به خواننده میده.
Profile Image for WaldenOgre.
735 reviews94 followers
October 16, 2021
整本书冒出的第一句话就相当的有分量:“历史是一门科学还是一门艺术,抑或两者都有一点呢?”在汤因比看来,历史不是也不可能是物理学或化学那种意义上的科学,历史学家或许正介于科学家和诗人之间。因为史料不见得都真实而客观,历史学家对于史料的筛选又必然是主观的,最后在撰写的过程中也无法避免本身自觉或不自觉的偏见。所以从严格意义上来讲,历史并不完全等同于史实,历史其实一直就是历史学家的历史。而历史学家所担负的重要职责之一就是防止历史沦为胜利者的宣传。然而再回想自己在义务教育和非义务教育阶段里拿到手中的所有历史课本居然浑身上下都充斥着无可置疑的定论,除了课后习题之外通篇也找不到一个疑问号。这个时候历史课本其实担负着和政治课本一样的光荣任务。

关于知识分子“出世”和“入世”的争论由来已久,正如对于纪录片摄影师或新闻摄像师处于旁观者这一身份时所可能需要面对的职业立场与道德伦理间的冲突挣扎。对此汤因比如是说:“假如我像在写一份气象报告(用BBC播送气象报告一样轻松的口吻)那样来描述希特勒灭绝种族的大屠杀场面,我并没有真正做到公平:我已经在袒护希特勒了,我已经在把邪恶的东西当作仿佛是正常的、甚至是善良的和普通的东西了。”在汤因比的眼里,所有人类事务之中并不存在纯粹的旁观者这样一个身份。哪怕在我们研究一个石器时代的古人时,也因为我们同属人类而共同分担着人类的命运。

汤因比将自己浓厚的宗教背景带入了历史研究中去,这在我们这片据说是以“实事求是”为准则的大地上很容易被贴上唯心的标签,从而沦为蒙昧时代的残留物。但汤因比的“上帝”并不是一个人格化的神,更多意味着神秘而未知的宇宙;汤因比的有神论只不过是泛神论而已。汤因比对此这样剖析自己:“我充分意识到人类事件的悲剧,充分意识到自以为了不起的骄傲——妄自尊大——所得到的报应……每次我都看到事情(指一战和二战)搞得一团糟,而世界又重新回陷到骚动和混乱之中。这种事情便使人们对人类事务采取一种宗教态度。”而厄本在随后引用尤金·约尼斯科关于文化的描述则更是给了我一个全新的认识:“(文化)只不过是一幅屏风,它使我们得以躲避我们本身对痛苦、厌恶、悲哀、恐怖、尤其是对死亡的忧虑。……我们通过书本(当然也包括音乐、绘画等等形式)表达自己的痛苦,希望与之保持一定的距离。”我想,有些痛苦和忧虑必然只能是清醒者和思考者的专利,那么至于他们是通过泛神论还是存在主义的途径去应对这种痛苦和忧虑,可能就是相对不那么重要的问题了。

整本书的最后一部分与中国读者的距离似乎更近一些。汤因比谈到传统所具有的巨大力量,以至于革命者抱着同过去彻底一刀两断的幻想而又每每大失所望。然后又引述托克维尔在《旧制度与大革命》一书所言:“革命并不意味着与过去一刀两断——事实上,革命所重新实现的正是那种旧制度。”如同佛教传入中国与道儒学派相融合后成为用旧瓶装着的新酒一样,共产主义和马克思主义传播到中国后也发生了再阐述和再解释这一过程。两相对照,如今索性大方承认自己所秉持的正是一种“有中国特色的”社会主义大概也算是一种比较坦率的态度了吧。当然,汤因比这老头偶尔也会露出反动的嘴脸——他居然把法西斯主义的国家崇拜和共产主义的阶级崇拜相提并论,按说这是相当伤害中国人民历史感情的事情。最后,汤因比谈及共产主义在英国的不幸遭遇:当英国共产党人的示威运动进行中既没有武装警察的看管,甚至连交通也没有出现过分的混乱时,这种示威运动想成为一股破坏现存秩序的力量的要求便遭到了相当程度的损害。私以为,在被称为打砸抢烧的这一小撮和那一小撮层出不穷的当下,这或许才是真正治本的良方。

最后的最后,我觉得必须要对那位“自由欧洲”电台的播音员G.R.厄本表达完全的敬意,因为他与汤因比共同完成了这样一组精彩睿智的对话而丝毫不显鸡肋之态,人文素养可见一斑。我于是又不禁琢磨着,当一个社会充斥着低俗而无知的DJ或电视主持人时,它所承认和推崇的所谓学者——不管是讲坛派还是苦旅派——恐怕也是颇为可疑的罢。
Profile Image for AH.
127 reviews
January 5, 2017
someone suggested this book to me and it really was a great read. I already had tremoundous respect for him so reading the book was just a pleasure all from Philosophy, religion to Science and technology.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.