Going against the grain again (not something I’ve done a lot, thankfully – maybe 3 or 4 times in the last year and a half)
This dialogue in this book seemed to have a Lieutenant Horatio Caine (David Caruso in CSI Miami) undertone.
This is the third Kristin Hannah book I’ve read....I finished it in order to count the author in a reading group challenge on GoodReads – 3 books by each author to count....while the first two books I read were okay, they were in my opinion young teen novels.... But right away, Magic Hour seemed to be much more adultified, yet within the first 3 short chapters, I had a pretty good inclination where the book was going..... so a star is lost for predictability....
Having 3 children with autism, this book left a bad taste in my mouth – the main character initially suspects ‘Girl’ to be ‘an autistic,’ but then gradually deciding against it only when the child makes meaningful eye contact – this annoys me – no, she did not say no child with autism can have meaningful purposeful eye contact, but she rules out autism as a possibility BECAUSE ‘girl’ made eye contact....I acknowledge the author probably hasn’t had her own personal experience with children with autism, and even if she did, I also recognize this is only a character the author has written -- I let this one go, hoping not to see references to this over and over again....
But then later on, I was further upset by this: “You’re not autistic, are you?” Julia said finally. “You’re worried about my feelings.” Yes, Kristin Hannah, you’ve probably heard that people with autism sometimes don’t outwardly recognize or acknowledge or worry about someone else’s feelings – but I have three children with autism who are very in tune with other’s feelings and who worry about them ! And my children are NOT the anomaly. I get that Girl is fictional, and that she was created by the author NOT to have autism – and no I do not think Girl presented as having autism....I’m not arguing these conclusions.... but it’s the insinuation that is coming across in the book that is reinforcing the stigma so many people believe that a child cannot possibly be autistic if they give meaningful eye contact or if they are worried about other people’s feelings....these are the constant battles so many people with autism and their parents face and it’s being validated in your book. How many times have I heard “there’s nothing wrong with that kid...she’s fine...she gives beautiful eye contact and look at how she’s caring for that child that just fell on the ground.” I almost quit reading..... The lack of research into this (and child welfare and other issues) becomes further apparent as the book moves along.
In a brief paragraph the character, Julia, a supposedly professional psychiatrist, contemplated “Asperger’s Syndrome, Ratt’s syndrome, childhood disintegrative disorder, PDD NOS.” Ratt’s Syndrome? I assume you mean Rhett’s Syndrome ???
I do see where I might have enjoyed this book at one time, and where many other people might give it the 4 stars – interesting plot, smooth and easy reading....but having 3 children on the Autism Spectrum, being caught up in a world of therapy and psychiatric assessments, I found the characters misleading and lacking authenticity. Hannah attempted to purport Julia as a highly esteemed psychiatrist, yet was one that if she had spoken to me about my children in the unintelligible ways she did in the book, I’d immediately ask for a different psychiatrist to be assigned to my children....the child welfare portion of this case was also not in the least well researched. I was also quite insulted by the character of the small-town police chief.
I don’t think Hannah is a horrible author – I just think she hasn’t found the genre that is most suitable to her writing....I’d like to see her concentrating on teen novels....that’s not an insult...it’s a lateral movement, really...with the 3 books I’ve read of Hannah’s I believe it’s a better fit for her writing.