I enjoyed the story but it needed work. The author repeated themselves, repeatedly. Kept saying how nice and sweet Jill was instead of finding different ways for the other characters to express their opinion of her. The author tried speaking in a formal tone to keep it more historically accurate but many times modern expressions crept in. The tone of the book did drone on a bit and read a bit boring at times.
There were two scenes to me that stood out as not historically accurate and that was Bill taking Jill to the saloon to go dancing. Back then, the only women allowed in a saloon were prostitutes or serving girls not "respectable women". They had her dancing and "shaking her hips as he did". Um, no, they wouldn't have been dancing in any way that their hips shook. That would have been inappropriate and immoral back then. The author would have been better off saying he was taking her to a town dance (assembly). It most likely would have been in someone's barn or in nice weather maybe in the town square.
The other scene I didn't think was historically accurate was when Lois took Jill to the bank to open a bank account. From everything I've read, women weren't allowed to have their own bank account unless their husband (or father) said they could and went with them to the bank and signed that she could. Also, that money would belong to him not his wife. She would just be allowed to use it by his say-so.
There was no chemistry between the characters and I think that is because this is supposed to be a Christian romance (they refer to God a few times). But some chemistry could be shown between them without being what a Christian romance would be considered inappropriate. A few times the characters kissed, but there wasn't any passion between them. The book would have been livened up if it discussed their attraction to each other. Bill, from the beginning, tried not to be attracted to her at all, feeling guilty about "cheating" on his dead wife. However, besides thinking she was pretty we saw no attraction of her or his turmoil in trying not to be attracted to her, which had we seen that would have improved the story. And besides Jill thinking he was handsome, again, we saw nothing of her attraction to him.
There was little conflict in this story. The conflict came in the form of thieves stealing from the townsfolks and Bill trying to figure out who these people are. Eventually, they come to Bill's sister and husband's property, where Jill is staying and she is kidnapped. The scenes are extremely short and is resolved very quickly. Jill and Bill never have a disagreement or anything misunderstood between them.
Also, I found it a bit creepy (icky) that Jill was only 18. It never states how old Bill is or I missed it, but I'm guessing mid-twenties. I know people got married a lot younger back then, but it just bothered me a lot that she was so young and to be married. It seems romance authors these days get around the "ick factor" by making the woman older by stating she still hadn't found someone she wanted to marry or she was a shy wallflower that didn't appeal to the gentlemen or she was determined not to marry unless she was in love or her "coming out" got delayed because her mother or father (or both) passed away and she was in mourning, etc. So, the romance story doesn't start until she is at least 21. In this story, Jill aged out of the orphanage and that's why she answered a mail order bride advertisement. The author could have had her stay at the orphanage a few years to be a caretaker/teacher for the younger kids until she was about 21 to make the story more appealing to modern readers.
Overall, an enjoyable story, but it could have been much better.