Anything Goes: A Biography of the Roaring Twenties

by Lucy Moore

This is an exhilarating portrait of the era of invention, glamour and excess from one of the brightest young stars of mainstream history writing. Bracketed by the catastrophes of the Great War and the Wall Street Crash, the 1920s was a time of fear and hedonism. The decade glittered with seduction: jazz, flappers, wild all-night parties, the birth of Hollywood, and a glamorous gangster-led crime scene forced to flourish under prohibition. It was punctuated by terrifying events—the political show trials of Sacco and Vanzetti; the huge march down Washington DC's Pennsylvania Avenue by the Ku Klux Klan—and produced a glittering array of artists, musicians and film stars, from F. Scott Fitzgerald to Bessie Smith to Charlie Chaplin.

Here, Lucy Moore interweaves the most compelling stories of the people and events that characterized the decade to produce a gripping account of an often-overlooked period. In doing so, she demonstrates that the jazz age was far more than just 'between wars'; it was an epoch of passion and change—an age, she observes, that was not unlike our own. The world she evokes is one of effortless allure and terrifying drama: a world that was desperate to escape itself.

Genres: History, Nonfiction, American History, Biography, American, The United States Of America, 20th Century

389 pages, Hardcover

First published November 1, 2008

About the author

Librarian Note: There is more than one author by this name in the Goodreads database.

Lucy Moore was born in 1970 and educated in Britain and the United States before reading history at Edinburgh University. She is the editor of Con Men and Cutpurses: Scenes from the Hogarthian Underworld, and author of the critically acclaimed The Thieves Opera: The Remarkable Lives and Deaths of Jonathan Wild, Thief-Taker, and Jack Sheppard, House-Breaker (Viking 1996) as well as Amphibious Thing: the Life of a Georgian Rake (Viking 2000) and Maharanis: The Lives and Times of Three Generations of Indian Princesses (Viking 2004). Maharanis has been reprinted six times, was an Evening Standard bestseller, and the top selling non-fiction title in WH Smith on paperback publication in summer 2005.

Lucy is a regular book reviewer for the Observer and the Sunday Times. In April 2001, she was voted one of the 'Top Twenty Young Writers in Britain' by the Independent on Sunday and in the 'Writers' section of the New Statesman's 'Best of Young British' issue.

Television presenter work includes Nelson for Great Britons (BBC) and Kings in Waiting: Edward VII (BBC) plus a number of talking head appearances.

Reviews

[Paul · Rating 3 out of 5]

2.75 stars
“a professor of sociology asserted that “the most dangerous weakness in a democracy is the uninformed and unthinking average man.”
Lucy Moore is a writer of “popular histories” and this is no exception. She has produced a history of the US in the 1920s. A huge canvas. She manages it by the simple expedient of producing a chapter on a series of topics. The sweep is broad and there are chapters on: business, the Crash, Prohibition and organised crime, film, Jazz, Hollywood, the Ku Klux Klan, politics and particularly Harding, Lindbergh, sport (especially boxing and Jack Dempsey), the literary scene (an excess of Fitzgerald), immigration, labour unions, the rise of the motor car, evolution vs creationism and the infamous trial and much more crammed in between.
It is readable and very anecdotal with very little that cannot be found elsewhere. It does feel like a first year university student’s attempt at it, following the adage “let’s cram everything in” (in terms of topics). As a result of there being so many areas covered, there is no real depth. Certain characters are focussed on: Al Capone, Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford, Jack Dempsey, Warren Harding, F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald, Charles Lindbergh and many others.
There are occasional flashes of insight which raise it from the really dire:
“So many aspects of the Jazz Age recall our own: political corruption and complacency; fear of outsiders; life-changing technologies; cults of youth, excess, consumerism and celebrity; profit as a new religion on the one hand and the easy availability of credit on the other; astonishing affluence and yet a huge section of society unable to move out of poverty.”
However the very number of areas under consideration mean that nothing is covered in real depth. There are a few errors scattered around. But if you know nothing about the US in the 1920s you will learn a good deal.

[Toni · Rating 1 out of 5]

I thought this would be more of a social history of everyday people, but basically it's a collection of short overviews of the things in the 1920s that everyone has already heard of anyway--Al Capone, Henry Ford, the movie industry, etc. At least I thought it would be a fun refresher course.

Then things started to be noticeably different from other, well-researched books I'd read. First it was a bit about Charlie Chaplin that sounded different than I remembered from the biography I read, but I just assumed that I remembered that wrong. Then the author went on to state that "trade [which should be labor if one is writing about the US] unions had all but disappeared" in the 1920s. I knew that sounded wrong--especially after reading a great book about the Pullman Porters and the establishment of the first black labor union--the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters--in 1925. That sounds pretty visible to me. Then the author went on to talk about how much money everyone suddenly had. Sort of true and sort of not. Everyone had CREDIT and people were dabbling in the stock market on margin, but real wages had not risen as fast as profits and the prosperity was not universal. Trusts and monopolies operated to fix wages, and 40% of Americans were living below poverty line. Black farm workers lost jobs throughout the 1920s. Overall GDP rose, but--as has been so repeatedly paralleled with the 2008 crash--it was the top earnings that skyrocketed, not the overall earnings.

Not even being halfway through the book, I completely lost interest by the time I was 2 pages into her chapter on American business. She misses connections--like the farm slump being tied to farmers maintaining the production of the war years but without the war-time demand (with their plowing more and more prairie under for farming which would result in the Dust Bowl) rather than storage, and makes some leaps and huge generalizations that don't even make sense. I still can't figure out what she's trying to say about Rotary and Kiwanis, which is interesting as I was a Kiwanian for about 15 years. Even the most cursory of internet searches disproves the author's portrayal of Warren G. Harding, or at best makes it "highly suspect." The consensus seems to be that he had 4 affairs during his marriage--hardly the sex maniac that Moore makes him out to be. That disappoints me--I was thinking a lot of high school kids would start taking a MUCH bigger interest in American History than they currently do.

For what started out as a promising book, this turned out to be a badly-researched and deeply flawed book that ultimately had no point.

[Victoria · Rating 5 out of 5]

Good insights into the20s

Easy to read and entertaining account of an amazing decade of American history. Lots to learn here and good gossip about the personalities involved.

[Jan C · Rating 3 out of 5]

It was an enjoyable read. But I have to question my enjoyment since it did sit on my shelf for about 7 years. I was about 1/3 into it and I put it on the shelf, whether on purpose or by accident. Maybe there was just another "shiny" new book that attracted my attention.

Fairly informative, kind of gossipy.

Touches on most aspects of the '20s - Harlem Renaissance, white people slumming in Harlem (not appreciated by the residents), the revamp of the Ku Klux Klan (Indiana has a lot to answer for), the Scopes Trial (again, a book that draws heavily on Edward J. Larson's Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion, so again I shall have to delay picking that book a while more), the literary scene - including the Algonquin Round Table.

Interesting to find out that President Harding (who had so many things going against him) was in favor of a federal anti-lynching law but was turned by Southern lawmakers. (There were rumors for years that he had African-American blood in him. Don't believe this was ever confirmed yea or nay.)

And, of course, the Crash.

For those who have any interest in the Roaring Twenties, this may be a good book to start with. Includes a decent Bibliography.

[alix · Rating 2 out of 5]

This book really was "just okay." It wasn't particularly cohesive--basically just a number of biographical essays on famous individuals from the '20s strung together without a coherent theme. It wasn't footnoted or well-researched, either. At one point in the bibliography the author notes that "as far as she knows" there is only one major work on Zelda Fitzgerald--as though she couldn't be bothered to check for sure. For a more well researched, better written, and generally more exciting read on the 1920s, I'd opt for Joshua Zeitz's "Flapper." Incidentally, that book also contains a cohesive central argument, which "Anything Goes" is pretty seriously lacking.

[Stewart Sternberg · Rating 4 out of 5]

Long book. A fascinating glimpse at a bygone era, and an era whose echoes can instruct in our current time. It is chilling reading about the rise of the KKK and seeing in that account the dangers of the current right wing fanaticism.

Readable, well organized. Ms. Moore has presented an accessible history. It is a survey for the casual reader and hopefully a jumping off point for someone with deeper interests and curiosities.

[Caroline · Rating 3 out of 5]

Not the greatest work of history I've ever read. It's entertaining and readable enough, but that's more a result of the subject than the actual content. The Twenties was a decade that is hard to make boring.

Moore takes a thematic approach rather than chronological, organising her chapters by topics such as celebrities, movies, sport, architecture, literature, politics. I'm not sure the approach works - it makes it much more a superficial, 'potted' history rather than anything approaching any kind of depth, and there's very little analysis of why the Twenties were the way the way they were, whether it was a reaction to the horrors of WW1 or something else.

But as I said, it's not boring. The pages are full of characters like Babe Ruth, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Jack Dempsey, Charles Lindbergh, Al Capone: flappers and mobsters and heroes and villains. It's a light fizzy read with little substance to it. Much like the Twenties, I would imagine.

[Kevin · Rating 2 out of 5]

Written with all the wit and analytical power of a Wikipedia article.

[Danielle · Rating 2 out of 5]

The first half of this book is excellent. Moore has a knack for weaving historical detail into a coherent narrative, telling the story of the Roaring Twenties. Her portrayal of Zelda Fitzgerald--as a woman who turned to hedonism as an escape from inner despair--was especially poignant. I didn't know much about the Fitzgeralds before I read that chapter, but I do not hesitate to say that it was the first time I encountered them as people. Moore's sweeping portrait of the jazz scene--as one of rebellion and despair and joy all rolled into one--was also excellent. If I had to recommend this book, I would recommend reading the first half. What would be a good stopping point, you ask? Why, the chapter "Fear of the Foreign," in which she spends a considerable amount of time on the Sacco and Vanzetti case.

Now, I am no expert on that case. I know more than some, less than others, and not as much as I would like. It's a historical mystery, and a tragedy as well--one that resulted in the execution of two potentially innocent men. Note the first word: potentially. As in, their guilt or innocence has still not been determined over eighty years later. If I were handling this case, I would stick to the facts, incorporating views from both camps, and end the chapter with a note that while the case is still shrouded in doubt, it continues to be as divisive today as it was in 1927.

Moore does not do this. Instead, she takes the opportunity to add as much preaching to her narrative as she can muster. This is not a "failure of the justice system" case; it is not a "we don't know what happened and we may have erred on the wrong side" case; it is not a "Judge Thayer went against popular opinion, and in this case popular opinion may have been correct" case. In Moore's hands, it is a clear-cut case of good and evil. Everyone who allied with Sacco and Vanzetti were Good; everyone who allied against them is Evil. And Racist and Xenophobic and probably a Fat Cat Capitalist, too.

I can accept that Sacco and Vanzetti were good men. I can even accept that they were innocent. But in quoting heavily from their supporters--and from the men themselves, who earnestly proclaimed their innocence and their faith in their ideals--Moore glosses over the most important fact of all, which she states earlier in the chapter: The year 1919 saw many labor strikes, some of which became violent, as well as anarchist protests.

Like bombings.

As in, blowing up buildings.

That's the kind of thing that strikes fear into the hearts of....oh, every person who values their life. To a person in 1919 or 1920, it probably seemed as though anarchists were trying to take over the country--after destroying it, of course! What would YOU think if multiple buildings were bombed by people who claimed "Long live anarchy!" I'd be terrified. And since Sacco and Vanzetti were anarchists...well. That certainly puts a damper on Moore's claim that everyone who opposed Sacco and Vanzetti were unabashed racists, doesn't it? Add this to the fact that after their execution, many more protests took place, including bombings of American embassies in Rome, Paris and Lisbon. "People involved in their conviction--the brother of the garage owner who had informed on them, Governor Fuller who had refused them clemency, one of their jurors, the executioner, Judge Thayer himself--were the focus of specific violent attacks. Thayer's home was destroyed and he spent the rest of his life living under permanent guard at his club in Boston." (Pg. 182)

Those facts do not seem to support Moore's thesis that Sacco and Vanzetti were members of a good-hearted group working to free lower-class Americans from oppression; they support Thayer's implied thesis that they were members of a militant group that did not hesitate to use violence to support its ends, heedless of how many lives were lost or property destroyed along the way. Did Thayer deny evidence that could have exonerated them? Most likely, and there is no excusing that. Were the men of the jury who convicted Sacco and Vanzetti racist? I'm sure some of them were. But it seems more probable that Thayer and the men responsible for Sacco and Vanzetti's conviction were terrified of anarchy and the violence it seemed to embrace. So rather than releasing them because they were not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, they convicted them--because there was considerable doubt as to their innocence. It was a failure of the American justice system, not a case of blatant racism. Had Sacco and Vanzetti been whiter-than-white descendants of Mayflower Pilgrims, I don't think the outcome would have been any different.

Moore doesn't even consider this idea. Instead, she brands everyone who opposed Sacco and Vanzetti an Evil Racist Pig, and labels everyone who supported them Intellectual and Enlightened and Compassionate Toward the Ninety-Nine Percent. Everyone in the middle becomes a Passive Supporter of an Unabashedly Racist Regime that killed Kindhearted Immigrants who Just Wanted to Spread Joyous Anarchy to the Little Children. Excuse me while I vomit.

In short, this book goes from fascinating to disgusting in the space of a single chapter. It's not disgusting because she sides with Sacco and Vanzetti, or even because her sympathies so clearly lie with the anarchists of the 1920s. It's disgusting because she deliberately twists facts to suit her worldview. It's disgusting because she takes a perfectly legitimate fear--the fear of being blown to smithereens by anarchists who were often from Italy--and turns it into "EVERY1 IN THE 1920S WAS SUPER UBER RACIST AND TAHT'S RONG!!!!!11!!!!!1!!! IF U DONT BELEEVE ME GO JOIN THE KKK!!!!!!" She doesn't consider other factors--factors that, if incorporated, would make for a much more balanced and honest history.

[Chris · Rating 3 out of 5]

I listened to the audio book and it is very interesting. It is interesting for many reasons and one because it is 2024 when I chose to listen to the book, nearly half-way through the 20's decade of this century and this book is about the 20's decade of a century prior.

The history of the 1920's contains many things of which I was completely unfamiliar, like Martin Luther King, Jr. being born in 1929, the KKK was formed in this decade, Hollywood started in this decade and there were also many people who died from drug overdoses, mainly from opioids which we are still seeing, only more so now, 100 years later. Flying became popular in the 1920's and prohibition happened in the 1920's as did the rise, and fall, of Al Capone.

I recommend this book

[Maja · Rating 4 out of 5]

a fun and informative popular history of the 1920s; a good starting point for those interested in the era. i especially appreciated the smooth transitions between the topics/chapters.

[Kathy · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is the 1920s in America and I thought the book gave a good overview of the good and bad of the decade. Each chapter deals with a different topic such as: Chicago and its gangsters, music and dance (Charleston and the blues); religion and its impact on law and society; cars and the introduction of the modern factory (and labour laws) and the stock market and great crash to end the decade.

Much of this decade with its great changes in society and technology seems familiar even today. The financial excess and great divide between rich and poor in a society whose rich were decadent and self-destructive and proud of it.

This was an era when there was minimal government regulation and intervention in lives of employers and labour laws were virtually non-existant. If you want to see what your life would be like without the improvements unions have bought into our lives in the years since you only have to look at this decade.

While unions in many cases (where they became too powerful and rich) eventually caused their own destruction books like these make you realise how people who want to go back to a nirvna of "little government" have already had that and while it was great if you were at the top of the pile for everyone else it was a jungle-like environment. Overall, this was a worthwhile read I thought.

[Nicola Pierce · Rating 4 out of 5]

I can see lots of negative reviews but I wonder if they are down to the fact that the writer isn't actually American. Anyway, I enjoyed it. I love reading about America and I love reading about the 1920s. Plenty of the 'cast', I had read about before - the Fitzgeralds, Chaplin and the Lingberghs etc - but it was my first time to read about the likes of Al Capone and Jack Dempsey. I was surprised not to see screenwriter, director, writer Francis Marion's name in the chapter about her best friend Mary Pickford. In an case, this was a very accessible and easy read.

[Ms Jayne · Rating 5 out of 5]

Enjoyable analysis of American popular culture in the 20s. Crime, political corruption, the arts, the Ku Klux Klan, prohibition and the Wall Street Crash are all explored in a readable and accessible way and the Lucy Moore makes the parallels between their world and ours very clear. I will definitely read more by her.

[Gwynneth Anderson · Rating 5 out of 5]

A fun, informative read.

[Trevor Seigler · Rating 4 out of 5]

The Roaring Twenties seem like a long time ago (and literally they were a hundred years prior to our current moment), but also super close to our own time and relevant to the many times we've gone through extraordinary highs only to experience deeply unpleasant lows (to my way of thinking, the Nineties are defined by a sort of can-do exuberance undone by the shocking events of 9/11, in the same way that the Twenties ended with the stock-market collapse and the onset of the Great Depression). I've long had a fascination with aspects of the popular culture at the time, and so this book seemed like a natural for me to read.

"Anything Goes: A Biography of the Roaring Twenties" by Lucy Moore, is a sort of cheat-sheet history of some of the different aspects of the decade that saw America embrace hedonism and excess in ways that we'd never done before (and to some extent never would again). It's not a deep, exhaustive tome about the various social movements that defined that time, but that's okay. I have another book about the Twenties ("America In the Twenties") that I'm meaning to read asap, so I'll probably look to that to be more informative overall. But while "Anything Goes" isn't the deepest book on the subject, it's enjoyable in its own right.

Moore details some of the figures and moments that made the decade so memorable, from Al Capone and F. Scott Fitzgerald to Jack Dempsey and Charles Lindbergh. Her book mixes the high and the low, from the Scopes Monkey Trial to the scandals surrounding the Harding Administration. As I said, it's not a particularly deep book (and there's the glaring error of calling Memphis the capital of Tennessee when talking about the Scopes trial), but it's entertaining in the way that popular histories can be.

I was originally unsure if I'd finish this book because I found the opening chapter on Capone to be a bit too light and breezy (and because I'd looked at some of the reviews here for the book, which are mostly unfavorable). But I got sucked in and kept on reading, which means that this book is certainly entertaining. I paid a couple of bucks for it at the local library's used book sale, so I'm not out too much and I enjoyed it overall.

[Sonya Clark · Rating 3 out of 5]

This was an entertaining overview of the 20s. Not in-depth, but a decent jumping off point to inspire further reading on the Jazz Age. All the parallels between then and now are especially interesting. This quote from the prologue addresses those similarities:

"So many aspects of the Jazz Age recall our own: political corruption and complacency; fear of outsiders; life-changing technologies; cults of youth, excess, consumerism and celebrity; profit as a new religion on the one hand and the easy availability of credit on the other; astonishing affluence and yet a huge section of society unable to move out of poverty. Perhaps we too are hurtling towards some sort of catastrophe, the effects of which will evoke those of the crash of 1929. After all, as history so often reminds us, there is nothing new under the sun."

Anything Goes was published in 2010. I'd like to think we've had our crash, and are in recovery.

[Paulette Kennedy · Rating 5 out of 5]

An entertaining light history of the 1920s. Covers a lot of the same territory as Law’s excellent Only Yesterday, but with modern, accessible flair, focusing heavily on popular culture. Read this in concert with Only Yesterday and you’ll have a great, well-rounded overview of the era.

[Leonie · Rating 2 out of 5]

Bite size snippets of history, mainly American. Nothing Wikipedia wouldn’t have given. Sigh.

[Denise Hatcher · Rating 5 out of 5]

This was an interesting book that consisted of fourteen chapters, each one detailing an important person or event of the 1920s. The first chapter focused on Al Capone. The second explained the development of jazz music. The description of the Fitzgeralds, especially that of Zelda, helped me better understand the backdrop of The Great Gatsby. Movie theaters and their development are explained in chapter four. The next chapter explains President Harding and his impact on the country. Page 147 explains, “Many industries boomed in the 1920s, but one stands tall above the rest: the automotive business.” The next chapter is entitled “The Fear of the Foreign” and traces the arrival and eventual death of Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Chapter eight explains the rise of the Ku Klux Klan. Page 230 describes, “Harry Crosby was by no means the most talented writer of his generation, nor the most representative, but he encapsulates so many of the things that inspired his peers: the feeling of alienation, the desire for self-expression and freedom, the conflation of pleasure and happiness, the philosophy of living for the moment, the pagan worship of the body, the belief that by continuing to move one would find meaning.” With this in mind, the author explains the term the “lost generation” and puts so much into an understandable context. The next chapter focuses on the literature and development of magazines, with specific references to “The New Yorker.” The debate about Darwin’s theory of evolution and what should be taught in schools follows. Chapter twelve focuses on Charles Lindbergh and the development of air travel. Jack Dempsey and the money making appeal of boxing are the focus of chapter thirteen. The final chapter explains, “The greatest and last triumphs…..may well have been skyscrapers, the radiant symbols of energy, wealth and modernity for 1920s America (p. 317).” Specifically mentioned is The Chrysler Building in Manhattan, where the small space forced building up instead of out.

Overall, this was a fun and interesting book to read. I knew some of the material, but not all of it. The author did a good job of weaving separate important people and events into a coherent book about a much referenced decade. Reading this book in 2022, I did ask myself how much has changed, and how different would a book written about 2020 really would be. This was a good history book for someone like me, a person who wanted an enjoyable and not overwhelming book about the past to better understand the present.

[Adam Glantz · Rating 4 out of 5]

Reading Lucy Moore's book made me realize that a lot of what we associate with America in the 1960s was present in the 1920s. Hedonism, openness to African-American culture, sexual experimentation, the glamour of intoxicants, the cult of celebrity, intellectual ferment, new technologies, political corruption, a sneaking fondness for violence, shell-shocked veterans, the desire to "drop out," and an almost suicidal cult of youth (Think of Roger Daltry singing "I hope I die before I get old" a few decades early). Also a feature of both decades: stubborn poverty amidst plenty, and a conservative backlash from old-boy elites and pious country folk alike, often more than a little tinged with racism. But the analogy isn't perfect: Missing from the 1920s were the idealistic political activism of the 1960s and, of course, the Vietnam War.

I didn't make the connection before now for two reasons. First, I associate the 1920s with my grandparents, who were very old when I knew them; they and their milieu seemed worlds apart from the 1960s, which was closer to my own time. But more importantly, I suspect that the memory of the lighthearted, high-flying 1920s is obscured by what came next: a global depression and a world war, much grimmer, unhappier times.

A word of warning before you begin this book: It's exclusively about the United States, with only a bit about some celebrity English expatriates and some Americans who temporarily sojourned in Europe. That's not a bad thing, particularly since the first half of the twentieth century is arguably when the United States reached a peak of power and influence. But if you want to read about, say, the Bloomsbury Group, the efflorescence of Weimar Germany, the origins of Italian fascism, developments in the newborn Soviet Union, or more than a few details about interwar Paris, you'll have to go elsewhere.

[Leslie Goddard]

I was genuinely surprised by some of the “meh” or outright negative reviews of this book, which I thought was fresh and vivid and fun to read. It’s hard to condense a number of dense, complicated topics (e.g. jazz, the Scopes monkey trial, the Sacco Vanzetti case, the rise of skyscrapers) into succinct, readable chapters but this book did it unusually well for me. And I found the writing lively and entertaining. It kept me engaged even with topics that don’t usual interest me.

I wonder if some of the negative reviews are because of the broader objective of the book — to provide a broad overview of an entire decade in one book. If you want to go into depth (or have in the past gone into depth) on any of the topics covered, you’re likely to find the content here rather brief. But that’s what an overview book does. If you want to read a rich, fully complex history of the growth of movies in the 1920s, this isn’t your book. But if you want a nicely summarized account of the major issues involved with the growth of the movies in the 1920s — put in the context of other major events occurring in the U.S. at the same time — this is a great pick.

I can see this book being a wonderful intro to the decade for college students, or any general reader looking for a broad overview.

[Simba · Rating 5 out of 5]

I have a long held fascination with 1920s America. I can’t pinpoint its origins, whether it was a movie I watched growing up (I’m a 2nd generation cinephile) or a book. Either way, Lucy Moore’s biography of the Roaring Twenties ticked all my boxes, and then some!

She took me from Al Capone’s home to the origins of jazz in Chicago nightlife, to the first waves of feminism, to the debauchery of Hollywood with words. I loved it!

She even managed to walk me through a whole chapter on the KKK, a topic I had been consciously avoiding because of its potential to trigger my sense of justice.

The book’s so good, I can’t pick a favourite chapter. A lot of the major ones came through with their bits of information about a time I can only wish to have been a direct observer of.

All in all, if you’re looking for a book that will somehow run you through the feelings of disgust, awe, excitement, fantasy through the lens of a defining time and place in modern world history, this is definitely up there in my list of recommendations.

[Matthew McDonough · Rating 1 out of 5]

As others have noted, the book starts off pretty good, but then just drops into almost unreadable, gossipy, poorly-researched rubbish. More often than not, it comes across as a self-published, glorified term paper. Some GLARING issues: teenagers in the 1920s borrowing the family car to visit friends(?); central figures whose names seemingly changed from paragraph to paragraph; and my favorite: constant reference to "Middletown," as if it is a legitimate U.S. city, with no explanation as to the origin of the concept.

There are countless books about the 1920s, and an equal number of biographies of the people who lived through the decade. I would recommend reading any number of those for a better, less biased, more educated look into a truly fascinating period in history.

[Marygrace Depp · Rating 2 out of 5]

This book had some great stories, but it all centered around Al Capone for most of them and I wanted something that really got into the history of the 20's which I didn't think this book did very well.

[Sandra Ross · Rating 5 out of 5]

The best overview of the 1920's I've read. Thorough research into all the factors that made the 1920's such a pivotal time in history and you can see a lot of links with what happened in the first decade of the 21st century. It was like reading recent history in many ways. I highly recommend this book.

[Johanne · Rating 3 out of 5]

A good introduction to the 1920s but if you want something a little more in depth, this is not the book for you.

[Isabel · Rating 5 out of 5]

I received this from a friend, as I am interested in that period. Really fascinating accounts of crime in Chicago and good portrayal of Al Capone. My only criticism so far is that it is all set in the US. Still it got me playing some old Bessie Smith songs, which is a very good thing.

[Alex Smith · Rating 4 out of 5]

Breezy, entertaining social history of the 1920's in much the same style as David Halberstam's "The Fifties" or Bill Bryson's "One Summer in America" (although shorter and more narrowly focused than either of those books). Lucy Moore writes about fourteen events or trends, with an eye for telling anecdotes (Bessie Smith's insulting the white hostess who attempts to kiss the singer at the end of a party) or memorable detail (Al Capone's predilection for splashy, pastel suits). Moore is not a "big picture" historian; each chapter in her book tends to stand alone rather than following a series of themes through different settings and phenomena. At times Moore notes the influence of earlier eras on the 20's - - her insightful argument that the skyscraper boom of the 20's could take place in America because it was a young country without centuries of architectural history to constrain this dramatic new style - - but in general she pays little attention to the effect that earlier eras had in shaping the 20's (e. g. she pays very little attention to World War I, except for its effect on developing the aviation industry). All in all, an enjoyable, easy read.

[Rachel Parham · Rating 5 out of 5]

What an incredible work of history and horror. Because yes, "Anything Goes" is one half history, with chapters on key moments and trends throughout the 1920s, like Prohibition and the subsequent rise of gangs, the expansion of Hollywood and the growing power of the film industry, the rebellion against social norms as seen in the artists and writers who fled the repressive culture of the United States, the return of the Ku Klux Klan and their crusade to keep America "American," the corrupt dealings in the federal government, most notably evinced by the Teapot Dome scandal, and the idolatry of technological progress, with heroes like Charles Lindberg representing humanity's great accomplishments.

The book is also one half horror because we in the US are living through these trends all over again. History is, in fact, repeating itself in truly eerie ways. So, now I am left to wonder: will the 2020s end in a catastrophe the way the 1920s did?