I FINISHED. I HAVE FINISHED THIS NOVEL. Whew. Ok so if a novel is a wine, this is a wine not to be gulped but sipped, walked away from, sipped again, and so on. This is not how I read it this time, because I plan to return to it more slowly armed with an idea of the whole picture. I do not recommend this book if you are neither an academic (or academically inclined) or an artist. If you are either of those, I think it is a worthwhile venture. If my reading is correct, it's basically like she is using a painting to comment on the current state and recent history of art while also using paint to comment on colors and the texture of the paint itself. Could it just be pretentious nonsense? Many have said this, but I think that they are wrong. I do not understand it well enough to offer definitive proof though, lol. Is it pretentious? Certainly!, but we read Ulysses and Mrs. Dalloway and all of those damned French existentialists, don't we?