Rounded up to 2.5 stars. Hey, it’s not a one star rating so at least I don’t have to worry about the author stalking me, right? Ugh.
Anyway, onto the actual book. I really wish I’d read more into the reviews before ordering this book - instead, I waited until I had already started reading it.
The story was (mostly) well told, and I’m glad at least some of the “facts” I thought I knew about the case (such as the fact that the victim, Payton “Bella” Leutner, actually survived the horrific stabbing - 19 stab wounds total - when I, much like many people, believed she had been killed during the attack).
It’s immediately problematic when someone is claiming to post a “full journalistic account” of the crime, yet mentions in the introduction that she was unable to interview Payton (the victim - the ONLY victim, to be clear) as well as Morgan’s co-defendant, Anissa. Instead she states that she “depicted them according to public records, including social media postings, court documents, and television interviews with Bella and her family, as well as public statements made by Bella’s and Anissa’s friends, family, and teachers.
As other reviewers have mentioned, obviously it’s unfortunate that Hale tried and was unsuccessful in getting all three sides to the story. But I also agree entirely with the reviewers who have said that because of these glaring omissions to help us truly understand the case, the book simply shouldn’t have been published.
It’s very obvious that Morgan is the only one Hale spoke with, as she recounts nearly everything in a narrative that paints Morgan’s thoughts as established facts, and shows absurd bias toward the attempted murderer (and very little mention or concern of the real victim, who was treated more like a type of footnote in the story).
It may as well have been titled Slenderman: The Trauma and Prosecution of Morgan Geyser. Everything centered around her, and she was pretty much always written about in a favorable, sympathetic light. It’s true that Morgan and Anissa were mistreated by the criminal justice system as well as failed by so many adults who blinded themselves to the signs that they (especially Morgan) were clearly very sick little girls.
I understand that the onset of schizophrenia in a female so young is incredibly rare, and I wouldn’t fault most any other parents one bit for not noticing the signs earlier and getting Morgan the help she so desperately needed. But Angie and Matt Geyser must shoulder some of the blame for this tragedy. The father had been battling the same illness all his life, and chose to live life unmedicated. The Geysers knew that when they had a child, that child would be much more at-risk for schizophrenia than other children.
Yet even when Morgan clearly exhibits signs of psychosis and disassociation, the parents choose denial over getting her help. You can’t tell me that they caught Morgan talking to herself, and Matt, also suffering from auditory hallucinations, actually believed that she was “acting out” as a “ploy” to “get out of trouble” (she was suspended from school one day for bringing a mallet as a weapon for “self-defense”... one her friend Sev, whom she frequently saw in hallucinations, told her she’d need). As soon as he asked her who she was talking to and she told him “the voices”, they would have become completely fearful that Morgan was suffering from the same illness as her father...
...in other words, they’d have to accept that their daughter wasn’t just “quirky and independent”, not seeming to care whatsoever what her peers thought of her. She didn’t have friends because she lacked the proper social skills to make real ones... not because she didn’t want them. But even while this obviously resulted in tragedy and left a little girl alone and confused with her thoughts (when her father’s illness should have been explained to her) - I can understand their hesitation and fear. What I can’t understand is how they continue to pretend they had no idea what was going on, just perpetuating the denial forever, apparently.
I get that they’re only 12 year old little girls, I do. The book likes to point this out repeatedly. But it’s as if Morgan and Anissa merely stole a candy bar from a store, apologized, and still got thrown in prison for her. THEY FREAKING TRIED TO STAB MORGAN’S “BEST FRIEND” TO DEATH! They thought she was dead and instead of even freaking out after and getting help, they ran from the scene of the crime, leaving her to die had she not been so fortunate as to have been spotted by a jogger who immediately called the police.
I also don’t but that these girls were doing this out of “fear” of Slenderman. That excuse is a lie at worst and a contradiction at best. They mentioned some fear, sure. But they also mentioned wanting to “live in his mansion with him and serve as his proxies” (killing others at his behest).
Is the irony lost on Hale when she publishes one of Morgan’s poems - a poem that asks, ”later on saw her alive - why do these girls all want to die? I want to live, I want to thrive! Why do these girls all want to die? When they’re so much better off alive?”
Perhaps coming from someone who had just tragically lost their best friend to suicide, this might seem caring and deeply introspective. But from a girl who stabbed her best friend nineteen times then left her for dead? I don’t know, why try to kill them yourself when they’re “so much better alive”?
Aside from constantly painting Morgan as the victim and the juvenile/criminal justice system as being inherently flawed, the book is full of random sentences - sometimes paragraphs - that just don’t belong, don’t add any meaning or significance to the story. One example of many?:
”At the court’s instruction, Morgan rose to her feet to apologize to Bella’s family. The Leutners displayed no emotion at all - except Joe, who looked away as Morgan spoke. Five years earlier, during a play date at his house, he had once fixed her favorite necklace.
Yeah, I’m not seeing the reason for mentioning that, either. I guess to establish he once liked the girl, but now felt broken after he’d trusted her and she had nearly murdered his own little girl? Ok?
Apparently Morgan is totally fine to re-enter society according to Hale - even as Hale reports nonchalantly that Morgan, now 20, 21? - meets a seven foot tall demon while in the psychiatric hospital - whom she calls Abaddon - and gets angry with her mother for not wanting to discuss her “new fiancée.”
Hale then mentions stories of how “Abaddon” and Morgan proceeded to get married, and at one point Morgan thought he’d left her - and that she “went to the underworld to get him back.” Apparently these are all just healthy coping mechanisms. I just can’t fathom how Hale tries to repeatedly emphasis Morgan’s young age and treatable mental illness as signs she should be released back into the community, then proceeds to destroy her own argument by describing a new character Morgan has invented who sounds very much like Slenderman - and who is to say this “new husband” wouldn’t give her orders one day that she felt she had to obey?
I’m sorry, I know this was quite the rant but this whole book was just so off, so biased, that I was annoyed throughout its entire reading. If you want the true story, there’s an excellent documentary on YouTube. But skip the book. Trust me.