While this book covers ground that has become familiar over recent years, I'd recommend it to others because it does a nice job of summarizing arguments about possible alterations to our current political systems while pointing out reasons why such alterations might be desirable (such as how a vote for a Senator in Wyoming is in some way worth 70 times as much as voting for one in California).
When it gets into the details after those summaries, in the chapters about specific topics like the House of Representatives or the Senate, it prioritizes the things that can be done without overhauling our entire constitution (thinking of the Senate case there, especially). In some cases, that makes the suggestions seem possible, but the Senate case seemed more likely to be an illustration of how unlikely any real change is (does anyone imagine a scenario where the "party of no" would vote to allow existing states to split into smaller entities, or to allow multiple states (for example ND, SD, and NE) currently sending separate Senators from that same party to be combined into one geographically large state of a more middling population, or to allow a "clean slate" redrawing of state boundaries to reflect the nature of residents better? At least it's very hard for me to imagine any such things happening. But the book does an admirable job of explaining the reasons why other reforms are even more unlikely to happen, and for cases where reforms _are_ possible, it explains multiple avenues that could be traveled.
I especially liked the examples in the chapter on the House, about how having larger districts with multiple winners can better represent the citizens of those districts, rather than having small districts with one winner (more often than not an older white man) per district. In our age of digital communication, who still sees necessity in trying to maintain geographically small districts as a way to allow constituents to know their representative better?
There's a certain amount of utopian thinking taking place here, but without some hope and optimism the future would be bleak indeed. For those still willing to hope, there are references to various organizations working for the preservation (or attainment!) of democracy. Even though most of that information is readily available via an internet search, having the groups mentioned here was enough of a nudge to have me go out and read about some of them while being reminded that, at its core, democracy is not a spectator sport.