Rating (Scale of 1-5) =
2.5 stars, I rounded up for the consistency of the author, and because I feel strongly bundling is such a great gift for readers especially those on a tight budget.
Overall: I think readers looking for escapism (especially books 2-5) with alpha males and lots of hot sex will really like these books, but... and there are a lot of buts, I feel there are multiple facets that could make getting through a bundle of this size tedious for others at best.
I found them okay but never bad. To me, they were better written than pure brain candy, but nothing stands out. The only things memorable were the location and 1st couple (Bk 1): the location because I'm originally from outside Atlanta, so that would not be true for most readers. The first couple, because book one is the only one we truly get any depth, have characters fleshed out, see growth over time, and their names are interesting. Plus, they feature prominently in all the stories. More specifics discussed in the below breakdown.
(Note: Sometimes, I review or "comment on" each individual book on GdRd's as I complete it, and then combine them for the bundle's review. I did not do that this time. There were plenty of reviews for the individual books, and I did not feel there was enough to separate books 2-5 to warrant individual reviews. The exception being book one; I bought and read it before the bundle. May actually do the reverse and put this review on the individual ones for future reference.)
Blurb =
Book one, 2 stars due to the lack of trigger warnings and other warnings often important to readers.
Books two-four, individually, were all at least 4 stars. They were much better with warnings etc...
For the bundle, 3 stars. Possible triggers from book 1 were still not mentioned, but at least the words "UNORTHODOX and INDEPENDENT " were used to describe the squad, because these stories require a strong ability to "Suspend Belief"; one cannot be a stickler for procedures etc... Think like the premise of Hawaii 5-0, results are all that matter very little constraints etc...
My Genre Scale = 4 stars
Odds if not your genre = 1 star unless wanting lots of hot sex
Development of: =
*World = 3.5 stars book 1, 2 stars for the rest. Book 1 establishes the how, why, and what of this task force if not in a lot of depth or grounding in the world in which we currently live.
*Characters = Book 1, 3.5 stars, we get more background and growth than in the others. Books 2-5, 2.5 stars. The others start to run together, backstories are different but characters are not. All are over the top gorgeous, bad asses (even the few non-cops), and most are huge alphas, with similar in style names like Fury.
*Plot = 1st 3.5 stars, the others range from 2.5 stars to 3 stars. Actual plots were often overshadowed by antics, personal drama, and sex. (which is fine for those looking for purely entertaining reads like for the beach).
What stood out (taking in consideration I've completed over 2000 m/m books) = Not much was memorable even while still reading back to back. Except for the 1st couple and the enforcemers, I got where I couldn't remember who was paired with whom they felt so similar. If I had to choose 1 thing, it would probably be Curtis; The young teen they caught robbing a Mom and Pop store.
Mood Type : Appeal to those looking for... (and /or those who should avoid) Some things were already mentioned above like LOTS of sex, ability to suspend belief (example: All gay, coupled up, elite Atlanta PD task force given cart blanch) etc... Those who want or don't mind a world of only beautiful, honorable, but boundaries pushing Alpha males should be fine. After book 1, other than the occasional mention, the only female detective disappears.
Warnings =
Book 1 should come with some definite trigger warnings, because serious sexual abuse and parental betrayal figure prominently in one main characters background. Plus, some readers are strongly opposed to reading about established couples playing with other couples or people and/or pairings of more than two; this is featured in book one and mentioned in one or more of the others. The others include things like stalking abusive exes, mild PTSD, family abuse, etc... but they were dealt with more superficially to move the story and came with blurb warnings individually (I believe).
HFN/HEA = Yes, all have definite HEA and wrapped up nicely, before the SWAT team I'd focused on starting book #6.
Series Notes =
*Reading on? I would have skipped books 2-4 if it were not for them being bundled. I was going to skip to 5 due to the wedding. I may circle back to the SWAT off shoot later on, like next summer but currently not reading on.
*Reading back to back? Yes, due to the bundle, books 1-5 were read back to back.
*Can be easily read without the previous? I think book 1 needs to be read before all the others, but otherwise each of the following could be read without reading the others. Technically, one could follow without book 1, but...
Rating Notes = (SubPlots, thoughts, etc... )
Entertaining and surfacely engaging. Not memorable as such, but fine for passing time. Consistent style and writing throughout, so how one feels about one book likely to feel about the others. Some proofing / typo issues (much more so with the later books). Occasional muddy timeline or task force details (like 20 in squad then 9 without clarification), but again, nothing that really disrupted the flow.
***************
Below is my philosophy on reviewing!
***************
1. I try to take into account and note common pet peeves noted by other readers
2. "Brain candy' does not necessarily carry a negative connotation. (What is brain candy? Publishing industry 's version of pop music - Typically: formulaic, from a prolific author published often and quickly (like monthly), things escalate fast, and are often solved easily etc..) It has its uses: to pass time when tired, on the beach, etc... The problem comes when "brain candy" is unexpected or even disguised.
3. Why rate the blurbs? :
Like many readers, I do not like to think I'm reading one kind of story; just to end up with another. But...I also don't think a book should be docked stars for being as stated. If I don't like stories about "_________", and I choose to read it; I shouldn't give it 2 stars based JUST on my preferences. Unless... it wasn't clear in the blurb.
4. Other Factors that effect my perspective when reviewing:
Since 2009, I have exclusively read m/m. My 1st was in 2007. I am a Kindle diehard, and I never do audio for m/m. I read at least 100+ books a year - with an average length of 220± pages. My Goodreads lifetime rating (at the start of 2022) was a 3.60 average for 1715 books. Which considering, one should be better at picking out books the more one reads, I feel is an accurate average. I have over 800 reviews within the m/m genre here on Goodreads.
5. I'm really confused by reviews that consist of just 2 to 3 sentences - with no explanation or evidence. I'm even more baffled when it receives "likes". I'm unsure of how it is useful to others on whether or not to pick a book, for example: "It was a fun read". Umm okay... What made it fun? For that matter, what do you define as fun? Do not even get me started on people who have rated over a 1000 books with a 4.99 rating average. How is that helpful? And there's is absolutely no way that every book is above average great / 5 star read. Why even bother to rate books?
6. I am not a writer nor a wordsmith, but I am a passionate reader. I joined the m/m group years ago, but I mostly lurk. I like to ask questions, debate, and quite possibly play Devil's advocate - which is hard to do online, with unknown people - to whom you are also an unknown- and no body language is available to convey intent. Plus, true debates seems to be a lost art form where respect and even friendliness can be shown between those with fundamentally different opinions.p