What do you think?
Rate this book
The Puppet Masters
First came the news that a flying saucer had landed in Iowa. Then came the announcement that the whole thing was a hoax. End of story. Case closed.
Except that two agents of the most secret intelligence agency in the US government were on the scene and disappeared without reporting in. And four more agents who were sent in also disappeared. So the head of the agency and his two top agents went in and managed to get out with their discovery: an invasion is underway by slug-like aliens who can touch a human and completely control his or her mind. What the humans know, they know. What the slugs want, no matter what, the human will do. And most of Iowa is already under their control.
Sam Cavanaugh was one of the agents who discovered the truth. Unfortunately, that was just before he was taken over by one of the aliens and began working for the invaders, with no will of his own. And he has just learned that a high official in the Treasury Department is now under control of the aliens. Since the Treasury Department includes the Secret Service, which safeguards the President of the United States, control of the entire nation is near at hand.
Except that two agents of the most secret intelligence agency in the US government were on the scene and disappeared without reporting in. And four more agents who were sent in also disappeared. So the head of the agency and his two top agents went in and managed to get out with their discovery: an invasion is underway by slug-like aliens who can touch a human and completely control his or her mind. What the humans know, they know. What the slugs want, no matter what, the human will do. And most of Iowa is already under their control.
Sam Cavanaugh was one of the agents who discovered the truth. Unfortunately, that was just before he was taken over by one of the aliens and began working for the invaders, with no will of his own. And he has just learned that a high official in the Treasury Department is now under control of the aliens. Since the Treasury Department includes the Secret Service, which safeguards the President of the United States, control of the entire nation is near at hand.
1 pages, Audio CD
First published November 1, 1951
About the author
Robert A. Heinlein
1,064 books10.6k followersRobert Anson Heinlein was an American science fiction author, aeronautical engineer, and naval officer. Sometimes called the "dean of science fiction writers", he was among the first to emphasize scientific accuracy in his fiction, and was thus a pioneer of the subgenre of hard science fiction. His published works, both fiction and non-fiction, express admiration for competence and emphasize the value of critical thinking. His plots often posed provocative situations which challenged conventional social mores. His work continues to have an influence on the science-fiction genre, and on modern culture more generally.
Heinlein became one of the first American science-fiction writers to break into mainstream magazines such as The Saturday Evening Post in the late 1940s. He was one of the best-selling science-fiction novelists for many decades, and he, Isaac Asimov, and Arthur C. Clarke are often considered the "Big Three" of English-language science fiction authors. Notable Heinlein works include Stranger in a Strange Land, Starship Troopers (which helped mold the space marine and mecha archetypes) and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. His work sometimes had controversial aspects, such as plural marriage in The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, militarism in Starship Troopers and technologically competent women characters who were formidable, yet often stereotypically feminine—such as Friday.
Heinlein used his science fiction as a way to explore provocative social and political ideas and to speculate how progress in science and engineering might shape the future of politics, race, religion, and sex. Within the framework of his science-fiction stories, Heinlein repeatedly addressed certain social themes: the importance of individual liberty and self-reliance, the nature of sexual relationships, the obligation individuals owe to their societies, the influence of organized religion on culture and government, and the tendency of society to repress nonconformist thought. He also speculated on the influence of space travel on human cultural practices.
Heinlein was named the first Science Fiction Writers Grand Master in 1974. Four of his novels won Hugo Awards. In addition, fifty years after publication, seven of his works were awarded "Retro Hugos"—awards given retrospectively for works that were published before the Hugo Awards came into existence. In his fiction, Heinlein coined terms that have become part of the English language, including grok, waldo and speculative fiction, as well as popularizing existing terms like "TANSTAAFL", "pay it forward", and "space marine". He also anticipated mechanical computer-aided design with "Drafting Dan" and described a modern version of a waterbed in his novel Beyond This Horizon.
Also wrote under Pen names: Anson McDonald, Lyle Monroe, Caleb Saunders, John Riverside and Simon York.
Heinlein became one of the first American science-fiction writers to break into mainstream magazines such as The Saturday Evening Post in the late 1940s. He was one of the best-selling science-fiction novelists for many decades, and he, Isaac Asimov, and Arthur C. Clarke are often considered the "Big Three" of English-language science fiction authors. Notable Heinlein works include Stranger in a Strange Land, Starship Troopers (which helped mold the space marine and mecha archetypes) and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. His work sometimes had controversial aspects, such as plural marriage in The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, militarism in Starship Troopers and technologically competent women characters who were formidable, yet often stereotypically feminine—such as Friday.
Heinlein used his science fiction as a way to explore provocative social and political ideas and to speculate how progress in science and engineering might shape the future of politics, race, religion, and sex. Within the framework of his science-fiction stories, Heinlein repeatedly addressed certain social themes: the importance of individual liberty and self-reliance, the nature of sexual relationships, the obligation individuals owe to their societies, the influence of organized religion on culture and government, and the tendency of society to repress nonconformist thought. He also speculated on the influence of space travel on human cultural practices.
Heinlein was named the first Science Fiction Writers Grand Master in 1974. Four of his novels won Hugo Awards. In addition, fifty years after publication, seven of his works were awarded "Retro Hugos"—awards given retrospectively for works that were published before the Hugo Awards came into existence. In his fiction, Heinlein coined terms that have become part of the English language, including grok, waldo and speculative fiction, as well as popularizing existing terms like "TANSTAAFL", "pay it forward", and "space marine". He also anticipated mechanical computer-aided design with "Drafting Dan" and described a modern version of a waterbed in his novel Beyond This Horizon.
Also wrote under Pen names: Anson McDonald, Lyle Monroe, Caleb Saunders, John Riverside and Simon York.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 947 reviews
December 20, 2022
Heinlein, did you really combine a very sexist plot element with the assumption that no gay people exist as the icing on the cake of your very awkward, biased, and wanna be subliminal writing?
Body horror initialization
I don´t know how many mind control, body horror, parasite,… tropes had already been established at the moment Heinlein wrote this book, but it might certainly have had a massive impact on many pandemic, alien invasion, horror, and sci-fi works that followed and it has more suspense and settings than some of his other works.
Conspiracy without a world
The agent, spy, government conspiracy, aspect plays a small role too, but it´s more of a vehicle to give the characters options to talk too much. Worldbuilding and action are hold small, rare, and I often asked myself while reading why Heinlein didn´t go the info-dumping way in both directions, not just with monologues, but with worldbuilding too.
Parasites grow big
How to find a cure has so many interesting variants and the more creative people think about finding a solution to this annoying infiltration parasite symbiont problem, the more interesting plotlines evolve, be it focused on technical, biological, magical, or mental eradication of that nasty mind bugs.
Conservative thoughts
The language and the mentality of the main character are both strange and fascinating, it´s kind of listening to an old man with dubious mentalities reflecting about life, not questioning anything or being unsure about the rightness of his mentality, but more reveling in his own points of view and why he is right.
Who cares about equality
How common sexism and bigotry were and that it was a shocking revolution to dare to describe naked people may seem laughable nowadays, but the people really lived and thought like that and still do in many societies as if nudity was a crime. Because of this involuntary side effect of reflecting on human behavior, it´s a better read than it would have been because it´s one of Heinleins´ poorer works.
Because there will always be controversy around Heinleins´ work and changing world views, I want to add some personal opinions at the end of the reviews
It seems a bit as if Heinlein had been a lifelong searcher for the right ideology, as he switched from one extreme to the other, leaving marks of it throughout all of his works. This is the biggest contrast to others, who kept their work clean from bias and agenda and it certainly built both his legend, fanbase, and critics by provoking and polarizing. Of course, it´s the freedom of art to integrate serious elements, as long as they are not dangerous, but the thin red line tends to be pretty blurry and while some see him as a visionary for alternative society models others describe him as a conservative, hate-filled, unsure man.
I don´t really care what his motives might have been, his work is something special and different, it´s just a prime example of why professional artists should keep their work clean from personal agendas, because that just, justifiably, feeds the trolls and ruins ones´ reputation as for example seen with the great three titans of sci-fi. Asimov: robots, psychohistory, foundation. Clarke: epic, subtle, philosophical, each time reading finding new depths, extremely complex. Heinlein: Meh, his writing was average, but did you know what kind of mindset he had regarding... See? While people will endlessly debate about the ingenuity of and inspiration from Asimovs´and Clarkes´work, they will remember Heinlein as the kind of strange uncle with borderline attitudes.
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...
Body horror initialization
I don´t know how many mind control, body horror, parasite,… tropes had already been established at the moment Heinlein wrote this book, but it might certainly have had a massive impact on many pandemic, alien invasion, horror, and sci-fi works that followed and it has more suspense and settings than some of his other works.
Conspiracy without a world
The agent, spy, government conspiracy, aspect plays a small role too, but it´s more of a vehicle to give the characters options to talk too much. Worldbuilding and action are hold small, rare, and I often asked myself while reading why Heinlein didn´t go the info-dumping way in both directions, not just with monologues, but with worldbuilding too.
Parasites grow big
How to find a cure has so many interesting variants and the more creative people think about finding a solution to this annoying infiltration parasite symbiont problem, the more interesting plotlines evolve, be it focused on technical, biological, magical, or mental eradication of that nasty mind bugs.
Conservative thoughts
The language and the mentality of the main character are both strange and fascinating, it´s kind of listening to an old man with dubious mentalities reflecting about life, not questioning anything or being unsure about the rightness of his mentality, but more reveling in his own points of view and why he is right.
Who cares about equality
How common sexism and bigotry were and that it was a shocking revolution to dare to describe naked people may seem laughable nowadays, but the people really lived and thought like that and still do in many societies as if nudity was a crime. Because of this involuntary side effect of reflecting on human behavior, it´s a better read than it would have been because it´s one of Heinleins´ poorer works.
Because there will always be controversy around Heinleins´ work and changing world views, I want to add some personal opinions at the end of the reviews
It seems a bit as if Heinlein had been a lifelong searcher for the right ideology, as he switched from one extreme to the other, leaving marks of it throughout all of his works. This is the biggest contrast to others, who kept their work clean from bias and agenda and it certainly built both his legend, fanbase, and critics by provoking and polarizing. Of course, it´s the freedom of art to integrate serious elements, as long as they are not dangerous, but the thin red line tends to be pretty blurry and while some see him as a visionary for alternative society models others describe him as a conservative, hate-filled, unsure man.
I don´t really care what his motives might have been, his work is something special and different, it´s just a prime example of why professional artists should keep their work clean from personal agendas, because that just, justifiably, feeds the trolls and ruins ones´ reputation as for example seen with the great three titans of sci-fi. Asimov: robots, psychohistory, foundation. Clarke: epic, subtle, philosophical, each time reading finding new depths, extremely complex. Heinlein: Meh, his writing was average, but did you know what kind of mindset he had regarding... See? While people will endlessly debate about the ingenuity of and inspiration from Asimovs´and Clarkes´work, they will remember Heinlein as the kind of strange uncle with borderline attitudes.
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.ph...
December 17, 2019
Putting this book down I cannot help wondering if Bob wrote this for the excuse to see, at least in his mind, a nation wearing no clothes.
You see, this is about an invasion of body snatchers type event, the aliens being large slug like creatures who affix themselves to the hosts’ skin. So, one method of finding the insidious creatures is an ordinance where everyone must be nude.
Clever! You are a devil, Bob Heinlein.
First published in 1951, this is a couple decades before he took the turnpike exit to weirdville, and this is not bad at all, but we may be seeing early glimpses.
Heinlein took the concept of Invasion of the Body Snatchers (Jack Finney’s classic Cold War allegory was actually first published in 1955 – AFTER Heinlein’s continental nudist colony) and tooled it to a SF alien invasion for a vehicle to espouse civil libertarian and free will doctrines. No doubt Heinlein saw the metaphorical qualities of the concept and made many direct references to life behind the Iron Curtain, but his narrative lacks the B-movie cool of Finney’s work.
Published between Farmer in the Sky and The Rolling Stones, this is bibliographically in his juvenile period, but this has more of an adult premise, setting and tone. Still filled with his inimitable Show Me state charm and his wise cracking similes, this is a true Heinlein classic.
You see, this is about an invasion of body snatchers type event, the aliens being large slug like creatures who affix themselves to the hosts’ skin. So, one method of finding the insidious creatures is an ordinance where everyone must be nude.
Clever! You are a devil, Bob Heinlein.
First published in 1951, this is a couple decades before he took the turnpike exit to weirdville, and this is not bad at all, but we may be seeing early glimpses.
Heinlein took the concept of Invasion of the Body Snatchers (Jack Finney’s classic Cold War allegory was actually first published in 1955 – AFTER Heinlein’s continental nudist colony) and tooled it to a SF alien invasion for a vehicle to espouse civil libertarian and free will doctrines. No doubt Heinlein saw the metaphorical qualities of the concept and made many direct references to life behind the Iron Curtain, but his narrative lacks the B-movie cool of Finney’s work.
Published between Farmer in the Sky and The Rolling Stones, this is bibliographically in his juvenile period, but this has more of an adult premise, setting and tone. Still filled with his inimitable Show Me state charm and his wise cracking similes, this is a true Heinlein classic.
January 25, 2019
This is the Heinlein book where evil alien slugs take over everyone's brains, causing nationwide chaos.
This novel was written in 1951 and is set in 2007 (whew! no mind-controlling slugs around yet ... at least not that I'm aware of. Though the current state of politics makes me wonder ...). The story is told from the viewpoint of Sam, who works in a secretive national security agency under a boss he calls the Old Man. Sam, the Old Man, and an excellent (and very sexy) agent called Mary head to Des Moines to investigate a flying saucer rumor and - more importantly - find out why six other agents sent to investigate before them have disappeared without a trace.
They discover the alien slugs hard at work, busily attaching themselves to the back of every human they can (once they attach, they control that person's mind and have access to all their memories and skills, so they can use the people they control to capture other people long enough to stick a slug on their neck). They manage to escape and report to the President of the U.S., who can't be convinced to declare a state of emergency. So our intrepid team goes back to Des Moines to try to get more evidence of the alien invasion ... and things start to go wrong from there.
I loved this old pulpy SF novel when I was a teenager. The four stars are based on that teenage love because it's pretty dated, but if you don't mind the 50s attitudes sprinkled with Heinlein's off-beat views on libertarianism and sexual mores, it's still a pretty fun read.
This novel was written in 1951 and is set in 2007 (whew! no mind-controlling slugs around yet ... at least not that I'm aware of. Though the current state of politics makes me wonder ...). The story is told from the viewpoint of Sam, who works in a secretive national security agency under a boss he calls the Old Man. Sam, the Old Man, and an excellent (and very sexy) agent called Mary head to Des Moines to investigate a flying saucer rumor and - more importantly - find out why six other agents sent to investigate before them have disappeared without a trace.
They discover the alien slugs hard at work, busily attaching themselves to the back of every human they can (once they attach, they control that person's mind and have access to all their memories and skills, so they can use the people they control to capture other people long enough to stick a slug on their neck). They manage to escape and report to the President of the U.S., who can't be convinced to declare a state of emergency. So our intrepid team goes back to Des Moines to try to get more evidence of the alien invasion ... and things start to go wrong from there.
I loved this old pulpy SF novel when I was a teenager. The four stars are based on that teenage love because it's pretty dated, but if you don't mind the 50s attitudes sprinkled with Heinlein's off-beat views on libertarianism and sexual mores, it's still a pretty fun read.
December 2, 2018
Evil, slug-like aliens land on Earth. They attach themselves to people and take over their minds. After a while, everyone has to walk around completely naked, so that you can spot the ones who have a slug attached.
I just can't understand why Paul Verhoeven didn't film this. He could have combined Starship Troopers and Showgirls into one movie, and both he and the rest of the world would have been happier. My guess is that he discovered the book too late and has been kicking himself ever since.
I just can't understand why Paul Verhoeven didn't film this. He could have combined Starship Troopers and Showgirls into one movie, and both he and the rest of the world would have been happier. My guess is that he discovered the book too late and has been kicking himself ever since.
August 29, 2025
„Кукловодите“ е много добър научнофантастичен трилър! Действието в него се развива динамично, като фантастичният сюжет е съчетан с политически и хорър елементи. От гледна точка на главния герой Сам, който е таен агент, проследяваме нашествието на извънземни паразити на Земята. След като се прикрепи към гърба на човек, извънземното започва напълно да го контролира. Сам и останалите от агенцията трябва да разберат какво се случва и да се противопоставят на опасните нашественици...
July 21, 2025
If your neighbour offers you a back rub - watch out!
No moral messages or satire! Nothing deep, subliminal, fancy, or indirect and hidden! THE PUPPET MASTERS is straight-up hard driving sci-fi action thriller based on the simple theme of alien invasion! Given the underlying culture of 1950s USA, the deep-seated American fear and paranoia over the Cold War with Russia and Cuba plus the ongoing bewilderment surrounding alleged UFO sightings and alien abductions, there are few surprises in THE PUPPET MASTERS. Despite that, Heinlein succeeds in hooking his readers from the very first page and producing a fast-paced tale that is extremely difficult to put down once you've started. Move over INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS, WAR OF THE WORLDS and DAY OF THE TRIFFIDS - you've got some exciting new company!
Sam and Mary, operatives for an ultra-covert government intelligence agency run by the Old Man, open the story as they are briefed on the arrival of a flying saucer which we will later learn is from Titan, Saturn's sixth and largest moon. The government, with typical bureaucratic blundering and political maneuvering fails to react to the threat against mankind when it is first recognized - the occupants of the flying saucer are a slug-like parasitic lifeform that steals its human host's body, intelligence and memories by attaching itself to a human's back and reproduces at a frightening rate.
Although Heinlein primarily used plot and action to drive the story to a thrilling climax and a warm-hearted optimistic conclusion, we are given snippets of his visions of technology and life in a 21st century future - non-habit forming drugs capable of dramatically elongating a person's psychological perception of the passage of time; heat guns; flying cars powered by impellers with one model laughably called the "Cadillac Zipper"; stereo-video, high resolution pictures and a multi-channel television entertainment universe (well, he sure got that one right, didn't he?); space travel; and, established colonies on Venus. It's difficult to say whether Heinlein was being unabashedly cynical or taking a stab at black humour when he portrayed the state of marriage as having evolved into a purely contractual arrangement with optional renewal after a specified term and payment of a salary from one party to the other.
One of the most interesting developments in THE PUPPET MASTERS is the government's decision to suspend certain civil liberties - the world's population is forced to live and work in the nude as the only way of ensuring a neighbour has not been hi-jacked by one of the "slugs". The alternative is being summarily shot by military or police forces, not to mention roaming vigilante groups. How ironic that something written over fifty years ago should suddenly be so timely! In light of recent events such as Al-Qaeda terrorist bombings, Heinlein's outlandish plot device gives one considerable reason to pause, draw a deep breath and contemplate what rights might be sacrosanct and which ones might be changed or eliminated in the world's efforts against terrorism.
With the exception of overtly sexist dialogue in the style of a hard-nosed Mike Hammer police procedural, nothing else would date this fine story as having been written so long ago. Maybe we can look to Spielberg to work his magic on this one next - the book was terrific and I bet it'd be a hell of a big screen epic too!
Paul Weiss
No moral messages or satire! Nothing deep, subliminal, fancy, or indirect and hidden! THE PUPPET MASTERS is straight-up hard driving sci-fi action thriller based on the simple theme of alien invasion! Given the underlying culture of 1950s USA, the deep-seated American fear and paranoia over the Cold War with Russia and Cuba plus the ongoing bewilderment surrounding alleged UFO sightings and alien abductions, there are few surprises in THE PUPPET MASTERS. Despite that, Heinlein succeeds in hooking his readers from the very first page and producing a fast-paced tale that is extremely difficult to put down once you've started. Move over INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS, WAR OF THE WORLDS and DAY OF THE TRIFFIDS - you've got some exciting new company!
Sam and Mary, operatives for an ultra-covert government intelligence agency run by the Old Man, open the story as they are briefed on the arrival of a flying saucer which we will later learn is from Titan, Saturn's sixth and largest moon. The government, with typical bureaucratic blundering and political maneuvering fails to react to the threat against mankind when it is first recognized - the occupants of the flying saucer are a slug-like parasitic lifeform that steals its human host's body, intelligence and memories by attaching itself to a human's back and reproduces at a frightening rate.
Although Heinlein primarily used plot and action to drive the story to a thrilling climax and a warm-hearted optimistic conclusion, we are given snippets of his visions of technology and life in a 21st century future - non-habit forming drugs capable of dramatically elongating a person's psychological perception of the passage of time; heat guns; flying cars powered by impellers with one model laughably called the "Cadillac Zipper"; stereo-video, high resolution pictures and a multi-channel television entertainment universe (well, he sure got that one right, didn't he?); space travel; and, established colonies on Venus. It's difficult to say whether Heinlein was being unabashedly cynical or taking a stab at black humour when he portrayed the state of marriage as having evolved into a purely contractual arrangement with optional renewal after a specified term and payment of a salary from one party to the other.
One of the most interesting developments in THE PUPPET MASTERS is the government's decision to suspend certain civil liberties - the world's population is forced to live and work in the nude as the only way of ensuring a neighbour has not been hi-jacked by one of the "slugs". The alternative is being summarily shot by military or police forces, not to mention roaming vigilante groups. How ironic that something written over fifty years ago should suddenly be so timely! In light of recent events such as Al-Qaeda terrorist bombings, Heinlein's outlandish plot device gives one considerable reason to pause, draw a deep breath and contemplate what rights might be sacrosanct and which ones might be changed or eliminated in the world's efforts against terrorism.
With the exception of overtly sexist dialogue in the style of a hard-nosed Mike Hammer police procedural, nothing else would date this fine story as having been written so long ago. Maybe we can look to Spielberg to work his magic on this one next - the book was terrific and I bet it'd be a hell of a big screen epic too!
Paul Weiss
May 17, 2025
Більше дописів та інфи в моєму авторському блозі - "Ласкаво просимо в Касл-Рок, штат Мен"
«Ляльководи» Роберта Гайнлайна, об’єктивно, - олдскульна наукова фантастика, яка з високою ймовірністю не залетить сучасному пересічному читачеві.
І на це є причини – скупий на описи текст, сухуватий. Специфічне ставлення до жіночих персонажів. Мері відіграє ключову роль в розвитку сюжету, однак дві третини тексту вона сприймається, як секс-бомба з мінімальним інтелектом. І це дійсно буде сприйматись в штики, бо лише під кінець відкривається багатозначність та складність Мері.
Але, але, але….Сюжет мене захопив і дуже сподобався. Ось ця баталія людства проти слимаків виявилась нелегкою задачею, з перемогами та поразками. Досить різкі повороти сюжету підтримували увагу.
А, найголовніше, - навіть лінійні персонажі не видавались всесильними суперменами, які одним мізинцем на лівій неробочій нозі з легкістю можуть збити летючу тарілку. Тут вони помиляються, хиблять, піддаються почуттям попри те, що слабина призведе до трагічних і несподіваних наслідків.
Кінцівка може здатися злизаною, однак не для мене. Мені всьо було, як треба. Шкода, що натяк на продовження так і залишився натяком.
Тож, «Ляльководи» Гайнлайна раджу до прочитання. І обов’язково почитаю інші його перекладені українською твори.
«Ляльководи» Роберта Гайнлайна, об’єктивно, - олдскульна наукова фантастика, яка з високою ймовірністю не залетить сучасному пересічному читачеві.
І на це є причини – скупий на описи текст, сухуватий. Специфічне ставлення до жіночих персонажів. Мері відіграє ключову роль в розвитку сюжету, однак дві третини тексту вона сприймається, як секс-бомба з мінімальним інтелектом. І це дійсно буде сприйматись в штики, бо лише під кінець відкривається багатозначність та складність Мері.
Але, але, але….Сюжет мене захопив і дуже сподобався. Ось ця баталія людства проти слимаків виявилась нелегкою задачею, з перемогами та поразками. Досить різкі повороти сюжету підтримували увагу.
А, найголовніше, - навіть лінійні персонажі не видавались всесильними суперменами, які одним мізинцем на лівій неробочій нозі з легкістю можуть збити летючу тарілку. Тут вони помиляються, хиблять, піддаються почуттям попри те, що слабина призведе до трагічних і несподіваних наслідків.
Кінцівка може здатися злизаною, однак не для мене. Мені всьо було, як треба. Шкода, що натяк на продовження так і залишився натяком.
Тож, «Ляльководи» Гайнлайна раджу до прочитання. І обов’язково почитаю інші його перекладені українською твори.
July 25, 2008
Robert Heinlein's The Puppet Masters is both an action-oriented adventure story about parasitic slug aliens attempting to take over the world and its citizens and social commentary on Communism and the Red Scare. As such, it appeals to young adult readers, who are looking for excitement and aliens, and to the general populace of the early 1950s, who would recognize the paranoia and militarism as part of the broader culture of the time.
This book, like Wylie's The Disappearance, is very much a book of its time, first in its Cold War references to the Iron Curtain and Russia, and second in its characterization of women and of gender roles. This comment made by Sam, the protagonist, is typical of the attitudes expressed toward Russia: "I wondered why the titans [the parasitic aliens] had not attacked Russia first; Stalinism seemed tailormade for them. On second thought, I wondered if they had. On third thought, I wondered what difference it would make; the people behind the Curtain had had their minds enslaved and parasites riding them for three generations. There might not be two kopeks difference between a commissar with a slug and a commissar without a slug" (205). It reflects clearly the divide between the East and the West and makes unmistakably clear the connection between the alien parasites and Communists. Later still, after the United States population has become fully aware of the problem and measures have been taken to protect them by curtailing their freedoms and increasing security, Sam describes the country as "undergoing a Terror. Friend might shoot friend, or wife denounce husband. Rumor of a titan could drum up a mob on any street, with Old Judge Lynch baying in their van. . . . The fact that most of the rumored discoveries of slugs were baseless made the rumors no less dangerous" (254). This description sounds very much like the effects of the Red Scare of the 1940s and 1950s. Just as the slugs are "puppet masters," taking over the free will and the lives of humans, so, according to this novel, are Communists puppet masters of their citizens, whose "puppet strings are always at hand" (262).
In terms of gender roles, although Heinlein's future society (the book is set in 2007) includes some societal changes that should affect gender roles and relations, such as new ways of approaching marriage (short-term, renewable, or permanent marriage licenses, for instance), the chief female character, Mary, undercuts this apparent progressive attitude toward gender roles. Mary is always little more than a sex object or a wife. When Sam first meets her, for instance, she is described as extremely desirable (in what is the weirdest description of a supposedly sexually attractive woman I think I have ever read): "A long, lean body, but unquestionably and pleasingly mammalian. Good legs. Broad shoulders for a woman. Flaming, wavy red hair and the real redheaded saurian bony structure to her skull. Her face was handsome rather than beautiful; her teeth were sharp and clean" (4-5). Although the next few sentences make it clear that Sam wants to jump her bones, this description is disturbingly like a description of livestock. Furthermore, although she, like Sam, is a field agent, and a very good one, even better than Sam perhaps, her contributions to the narrative eventually deteriorate to the point where all she says is "Yes, dear." Stay here; go back; have a baby; go with me to fight aliens on a faraway planet--to all of these things, she says "Yes dear." Having said that she is a good field agent, however, it must be pointed out that her primary skill seems to be flirting. Her job for the first half of the book is to act sexy around men and see if they respond. If they don't, bam! They must be slug-infested slaves. In fact, she tells Sam after their marriage that fists are not her weapons. Sam reflects, "I knew that she did not mean that guns were her weapons; she meant something older and more primitive. True, she could fight like a bad-tempered Kodiak bear and I respected her for it, but she was no Amazon. An Amazon doesn't look that way with her head on a pillow. Mary's true strength lay in her other talents" (220).
This book is frequently marketed to young adult readers and I have read several reviews that say that although they wouldn't re-read it as an adult, they would recommend it to an adolescent reader, especially adolescent boys. I would not. These ideas about women and sex roles simply permeate the book and most young readers are not equipped to deconstruct them.
A final element of the book and another reason I wouldn't give this to a young reader is the militarism of the ending. The final chapter of the book sees Sam and Mary packing up to go to Titan and finish off the rest of the slug parasites so they cannot return and attack again in the future. While that's a sensible goal given the situation, the ideology in which it is steeped is troubling. Sam says, of this goal, "Whether we make it or not, the human race has got to keep up its well-earned reputation for ferocity. If the slugs taught us anything, it was that the price of freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time, and with utter recklessness" (338). He continues, saying, "Well, if Man wants to be top dog--or even a respected neighbor--he'll have to fight for it. Beat the plowshares back into swords; the other was a maiden aunt's fancy" (338). Freedom, according to Heinlein, is only to be found at the muzzle of a gun and pacifism is no more than a silly woman's dream. Not only that, but it is humankind's place to be fierce and not only to be respected but to be in charge. This complements American patriotism and nationalism too well for it not to be a problem, especially given the lessons we should have learned over the last few years. The final lines of the book complete the image of glory-seeking freedom fighters: "We are about to transship. I feel exhilarated. Puppet masters--the free men are coming to kill you! Death and Destruction!" (340). Given the political climate of the time, this furthers the separation between East and West, "puppet masters" and "free," and justifies the ongoing Cold War and its attendant curtailments of freedom. Given our current political climate, it does much the same, only exchanging Communist puppet masters with Islamic terrorist leaders.
This book, like Wylie's The Disappearance, is very much a book of its time, first in its Cold War references to the Iron Curtain and Russia, and second in its characterization of women and of gender roles. This comment made by Sam, the protagonist, is typical of the attitudes expressed toward Russia: "I wondered why the titans [the parasitic aliens] had not attacked Russia first; Stalinism seemed tailormade for them. On second thought, I wondered if they had. On third thought, I wondered what difference it would make; the people behind the Curtain had had their minds enslaved and parasites riding them for three generations. There might not be two kopeks difference between a commissar with a slug and a commissar without a slug" (205). It reflects clearly the divide between the East and the West and makes unmistakably clear the connection between the alien parasites and Communists. Later still, after the United States population has become fully aware of the problem and measures have been taken to protect them by curtailing their freedoms and increasing security, Sam describes the country as "undergoing a Terror. Friend might shoot friend, or wife denounce husband. Rumor of a titan could drum up a mob on any street, with Old Judge Lynch baying in their van. . . . The fact that most of the rumored discoveries of slugs were baseless made the rumors no less dangerous" (254). This description sounds very much like the effects of the Red Scare of the 1940s and 1950s. Just as the slugs are "puppet masters," taking over the free will and the lives of humans, so, according to this novel, are Communists puppet masters of their citizens, whose "puppet strings are always at hand" (262).
In terms of gender roles, although Heinlein's future society (the book is set in 2007) includes some societal changes that should affect gender roles and relations, such as new ways of approaching marriage (short-term, renewable, or permanent marriage licenses, for instance), the chief female character, Mary, undercuts this apparent progressive attitude toward gender roles. Mary is always little more than a sex object or a wife. When Sam first meets her, for instance, she is described as extremely desirable (in what is the weirdest description of a supposedly sexually attractive woman I think I have ever read): "A long, lean body, but unquestionably and pleasingly mammalian. Good legs. Broad shoulders for a woman. Flaming, wavy red hair and the real redheaded saurian bony structure to her skull. Her face was handsome rather than beautiful; her teeth were sharp and clean" (4-5). Although the next few sentences make it clear that Sam wants to jump her bones, this description is disturbingly like a description of livestock. Furthermore, although she, like Sam, is a field agent, and a very good one, even better than Sam perhaps, her contributions to the narrative eventually deteriorate to the point where all she says is "Yes, dear." Stay here; go back; have a baby; go with me to fight aliens on a faraway planet--to all of these things, she says "Yes dear." Having said that she is a good field agent, however, it must be pointed out that her primary skill seems to be flirting. Her job for the first half of the book is to act sexy around men and see if they respond. If they don't, bam! They must be slug-infested slaves. In fact, she tells Sam after their marriage that fists are not her weapons. Sam reflects, "I knew that she did not mean that guns were her weapons; she meant something older and more primitive. True, she could fight like a bad-tempered Kodiak bear and I respected her for it, but she was no Amazon. An Amazon doesn't look that way with her head on a pillow. Mary's true strength lay in her other talents" (220).
This book is frequently marketed to young adult readers and I have read several reviews that say that although they wouldn't re-read it as an adult, they would recommend it to an adolescent reader, especially adolescent boys. I would not. These ideas about women and sex roles simply permeate the book and most young readers are not equipped to deconstruct them.
A final element of the book and another reason I wouldn't give this to a young reader is the militarism of the ending. The final chapter of the book sees Sam and Mary packing up to go to Titan and finish off the rest of the slug parasites so they cannot return and attack again in the future. While that's a sensible goal given the situation, the ideology in which it is steeped is troubling. Sam says, of this goal, "Whether we make it or not, the human race has got to keep up its well-earned reputation for ferocity. If the slugs taught us anything, it was that the price of freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time, and with utter recklessness" (338). He continues, saying, "Well, if Man wants to be top dog--or even a respected neighbor--he'll have to fight for it. Beat the plowshares back into swords; the other was a maiden aunt's fancy" (338). Freedom, according to Heinlein, is only to be found at the muzzle of a gun and pacifism is no more than a silly woman's dream. Not only that, but it is humankind's place to be fierce and not only to be respected but to be in charge. This complements American patriotism and nationalism too well for it not to be a problem, especially given the lessons we should have learned over the last few years. The final lines of the book complete the image of glory-seeking freedom fighters: "We are about to transship. I feel exhilarated. Puppet masters--the free men are coming to kill you! Death and Destruction!" (340). Given the political climate of the time, this furthers the separation between East and West, "puppet masters" and "free," and justifies the ongoing Cold War and its attendant curtailments of freedom. Given our current political climate, it does much the same, only exchanging Communist puppet masters with Islamic terrorist leaders.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
September 25, 2015
I enjoyed this book for its story which was well thought out and interesting. However it's age definitely showed mostly in the naivety of the writing. I can't really describe what I mean exactly but if you read it I think you will understand straight away. And the dialogue left a bit to be desired as well. Nevertheless it is a true science fiction story of the old kind and it is very readable.
January 8, 2009
I have no problem with dated things. I do not hold against a past time its inability to miraculously speak to my present. I enjoy trying to crawl into the context of a different reader who may have lived decades or centuries ago and to imagine their responses to what I am reading...or to imagine what rules the author tried to follow or break, as the case may be. I seek this kind of exercise in books, art, film, music...it's one of the many reasons why I dig old stuff.
So, regarding The Puppet Masters, I feel compelled to observe that it is not its dated quality that specifically irks me. As a work of early science fiction, this novel earns a high rank for introducing about a thousand tropes that became par for the course in later scifi novels and films. It must have seemed strikingly original to contemporary readers and the story stands up today. It has much to recommend it. But I will forget, for a moment, The Puppet Masters' status as a science fiction novel and consider it in light of another genre to which it relates.
The Puppet Masters begs comparison, not just with other scifi novels, but with the pulp novels that inspired film noir. Heinlein portrays the Titanian slug invasion as a mystery to be solved and his characters as the confrontational, go-to (hardboiled even?) individuals who will get to the bottom of the problem and resolve it, come hell or high water. It's got the wisecracks, the unadorned yet coy dialogue, the hero's ethical (if not moral) ambiguity, and it's got a purportedly dangerous female protagonist…and in the "purportedly" lies my beef with The Puppet Masters. "Mary", its female protagonist seems more subservient than dangerous, and not even subservient in that spoiled-brat, woman-child, I'm-just-doing-this-to-get-my-way sort of way. Though no more forward-thinking in terms of rewriting the hackneyed gender map, at least this latter behavior has some spirit in it, for crying out loud.
I like a good detective novel and I love noir films, genres which are riddled with female stereotypes, so it's not the sexism of the novel per se that gets me. I expect sexism from a novel straight from the 50s - whence also many pulp novels and films - and so try not to let it overly determine my feel for the work as a whole. So it's not the sexism in The Puppet Masters that annoys me…it's the kind of sexism.
What's upsetting about Mary is that Heinlein describes her for the reader, through the mouths of his other characters, as a deadly assassin, a smart cookie, a femme fatal. He leads us to expect a character of this ilk…and then he offers us, not Barbara Stanwyck, but Donna Reed with an upsetting past. Ok, she's not quite that bad, at least not in the beginning, but by the novel's end she makes Lana Turner in The Postman Always Rings Twice look like a woman of independent spirit. The "yes dear"s and "whatever you say dear"s made me pray Mary would get, and stay, "hagridden", as people who play host to a Titanian parasite are called.
One of the characteristics of pulp and noir that makes the genre so compelling is the juxtaposing of the male protagonist with a female who actually challenges him. She's often evil. He usually has to kill her. And of course those stories perpetuate the whore/virgin dichotomous view of the female gender that is no friend to women, but at least these female characters possess agency and independent will. They function as foils to the heroes and flesh out those male characters. The more spirited the female protagonist, the stronger the hero. That's how this equation works. But, despite Heinlein's early hints and implications that this is the kind of dynamic he's cultivating, Mary does none of the above for "Sam", the hero of The Puppet Masters. And consequently, her shortcomings become his. He seems less formidable precisely because he finds no rival of any consequence in her. Heinlein promises this rivalry the first time he introduces her character, but he never delivers. Mary doesn't need to become host to an alien parasite, because she's already hagridden by Sam.
So, regarding The Puppet Masters, I feel compelled to observe that it is not its dated quality that specifically irks me. As a work of early science fiction, this novel earns a high rank for introducing about a thousand tropes that became par for the course in later scifi novels and films. It must have seemed strikingly original to contemporary readers and the story stands up today. It has much to recommend it. But I will forget, for a moment, The Puppet Masters' status as a science fiction novel and consider it in light of another genre to which it relates.
The Puppet Masters begs comparison, not just with other scifi novels, but with the pulp novels that inspired film noir. Heinlein portrays the Titanian slug invasion as a mystery to be solved and his characters as the confrontational, go-to (hardboiled even?) individuals who will get to the bottom of the problem and resolve it, come hell or high water. It's got the wisecracks, the unadorned yet coy dialogue, the hero's ethical (if not moral) ambiguity, and it's got a purportedly dangerous female protagonist…and in the "purportedly" lies my beef with The Puppet Masters. "Mary", its female protagonist seems more subservient than dangerous, and not even subservient in that spoiled-brat, woman-child, I'm-just-doing-this-to-get-my-way sort of way. Though no more forward-thinking in terms of rewriting the hackneyed gender map, at least this latter behavior has some spirit in it, for crying out loud.
I like a good detective novel and I love noir films, genres which are riddled with female stereotypes, so it's not the sexism of the novel per se that gets me. I expect sexism from a novel straight from the 50s - whence also many pulp novels and films - and so try not to let it overly determine my feel for the work as a whole. So it's not the sexism in The Puppet Masters that annoys me…it's the kind of sexism.
What's upsetting about Mary is that Heinlein describes her for the reader, through the mouths of his other characters, as a deadly assassin, a smart cookie, a femme fatal. He leads us to expect a character of this ilk…and then he offers us, not Barbara Stanwyck, but Donna Reed with an upsetting past. Ok, she's not quite that bad, at least not in the beginning, but by the novel's end she makes Lana Turner in The Postman Always Rings Twice look like a woman of independent spirit. The "yes dear"s and "whatever you say dear"s made me pray Mary would get, and stay, "hagridden", as people who play host to a Titanian parasite are called.
One of the characteristics of pulp and noir that makes the genre so compelling is the juxtaposing of the male protagonist with a female who actually challenges him. She's often evil. He usually has to kill her. And of course those stories perpetuate the whore/virgin dichotomous view of the female gender that is no friend to women, but at least these female characters possess agency and independent will. They function as foils to the heroes and flesh out those male characters. The more spirited the female protagonist, the stronger the hero. That's how this equation works. But, despite Heinlein's early hints and implications that this is the kind of dynamic he's cultivating, Mary does none of the above for "Sam", the hero of The Puppet Masters. And consequently, her shortcomings become his. He seems less formidable precisely because he finds no rival of any consequence in her. Heinlein promises this rivalry the first time he introduces her character, but he never delivers. Mary doesn't need to become host to an alien parasite, because she's already hagridden by Sam.
November 5, 2021
Robert Heinlein es uno de los grandes de la Edad Dorada de la ciencia ficción – el periodo comprendido entre 1939 y 1946 – junto con autores como Asimov, Clarke, Bradbury y muchos otros. En esta obra inaugura el subgénero de las invasiones extraterrestres en forma de ladrones de cuerpos, que aquí son unas babosas procedentes de Titan, que se adhieren subrepticiamente a la nuca de los humanos y los convierten en sus esclavos sin que aparentemente cambien. Vaya, todo un festín para los amantes de la CF viejuna.
Se han buscado muchos significados a esta obra; fundamentalmente refleja la paranoia de una época en que el vecino o el médico, bajo una apariencia encantadora, podía ser en realidad un peligroso comunista a las órdenes de Moscú. La Guerra Fría empezaba a manifestarse en toda su crudeza, especialmente después de que en 1949 llegara la noticia de que los rusos disponían de la bomba atómica y de que China se había convertido a la órbita comunista.
Pero leída como novela de aventuras aún funciona bien, ya que hay mucha acción y agentes secretos que recuerdan un poco a James Bond. Se ha acusado a Heinlein de tener una ideología militarista de derechas y machista. Pues bien, leyendo esta novela se pueden encontrar claros rasgos que lo confirman, así que desde una perspectiva política o de género… mejor abstenerse.
Para una reseña más completa:
http://universodecienciaficcion.blogs...
Se han buscado muchos significados a esta obra; fundamentalmente refleja la paranoia de una época en que el vecino o el médico, bajo una apariencia encantadora, podía ser en realidad un peligroso comunista a las órdenes de Moscú. La Guerra Fría empezaba a manifestarse en toda su crudeza, especialmente después de que en 1949 llegara la noticia de que los rusos disponían de la bomba atómica y de que China se había convertido a la órbita comunista.
Pero leída como novela de aventuras aún funciona bien, ya que hay mucha acción y agentes secretos que recuerdan un poco a James Bond. Se ha acusado a Heinlein de tener una ideología militarista de derechas y machista. Pues bien, leyendo esta novela se pueden encontrar claros rasgos que lo confirman, así que desde una perspectiva política o de género… mejor abstenerse.
Para una reseña más completa:
http://universodecienciaficcion.blogs...
July 30, 2011
Alien invasion? Fifties paranoia? Mind control?
After a visit to the British Library’s Out of this World Exhibition in London, I was suddenly reminded that I hadn’t read this Heinlein for a long while.
And indeed I haven’t read it in its ‘uncensored’ version, which was published in 1990 with the tale increased from about 60 000 words to 96 000.
So: it was time to revisit!
Puppet Masters is Heinlein’s version of an alien invasion tale, written at a time when such tales were popular in film and in prose.
The tale itself is quite simple. Told in the first person, ‘Sam’ Nivens (not his real name) is working for the US secret service. This means different names, different places, different faces (as I find on the first page a blonde in bed with Sam, who wasn’t there in my original version!)
He’s assigned with a red-headed woman currently named Mary and his boss, ‘the Old Man’, who go to investigate a report of a crashed saucer in Des Moines. It is quickly claimed to be a hoax – a schoolboy prank reported by an overenthusiastic local news station, but there is clearly more to it. Mary, being the typical Heinlein heroine, notices she doesn’t get a reaction from the adult males that she usually receives – the drooling is pretty much left to Sam.
Things develop as Sam and his colleagues quickly discover a secret invasion is going on that seems to suggest the future of the human race is at stake. Sam’s job is to stop it.
Those of you who know ‘Operation Annihilate’ from Star Trek: the Original Series will get an idea of this story and realise how close these tales are. I’m surprised Heinlein didn’t sue, frankly.
But back to the book. What we have here though is a B-movie plot written in the Heinlein way, with all the good and bad points it entails. There is the usual fabulous prose, the honed wise-cracking comments, the drip-feeding of all those little neat ideas that Heinlein does so well. The plot moves along at a great pace and there’s a lot of tension and suspense along the way.
There’s also the use of a typical strong red-headed Heinlein-gal, with all the ‘Hey, sister’ type comments that the Heinlein character usually has attached to it. These still jar a little, even allowing for the context of the times. Though Mary is fast, intelligent, strong, resourceful and more than capable, there is still a feeling that all she’s there for is to serve the needs of our Hero, Sam. This is not by far the worst example of this by RAH – later novels do it much more – but it is more noticeable in this souped-up, more risqué version.
This is perhaps where I see a transition between the juveniles and say, Stranger in a Strange Land: this still has the excitement and the pace of the juvies, but the addition of the posturing lecture seen in later books such as Stranger. That and the need to get naked.
Sometimes ‘more’ can mean ‘less’, and I’m reminded of that, as I was when I read the longer version of Stranger in a Strange Land – I’m in two minds to decide whether this longer Puppet Masters is one of those examples.
Despite this, the tale’s an engaging one and must have shook things up a little when first published in 1951 – 60 years ago. There are parts that are quite good, for all of my complaints.
In summary, though, this is an interesting read: an alien invasion story with some intelligence that shows many of Heinlein’s strengths, but a few of his weaknesses, and sadly more so in this longer version. It is definitely worth reading, though it has to be seen as a product of its time.
After a visit to the British Library’s Out of this World Exhibition in London, I was suddenly reminded that I hadn’t read this Heinlein for a long while.
And indeed I haven’t read it in its ‘uncensored’ version, which was published in 1990 with the tale increased from about 60 000 words to 96 000.
So: it was time to revisit!
Puppet Masters is Heinlein’s version of an alien invasion tale, written at a time when such tales were popular in film and in prose.
The tale itself is quite simple. Told in the first person, ‘Sam’ Nivens (not his real name) is working for the US secret service. This means different names, different places, different faces (as I find on the first page a blonde in bed with Sam, who wasn’t there in my original version!)
He’s assigned with a red-headed woman currently named Mary and his boss, ‘the Old Man’, who go to investigate a report of a crashed saucer in Des Moines. It is quickly claimed to be a hoax – a schoolboy prank reported by an overenthusiastic local news station, but there is clearly more to it. Mary, being the typical Heinlein heroine, notices she doesn’t get a reaction from the adult males that she usually receives – the drooling is pretty much left to Sam.
Things develop as Sam and his colleagues quickly discover a secret invasion is going on that seems to suggest the future of the human race is at stake. Sam’s job is to stop it.
Those of you who know ‘Operation Annihilate’ from Star Trek: the Original Series will get an idea of this story and realise how close these tales are. I’m surprised Heinlein didn’t sue, frankly.
But back to the book. What we have here though is a B-movie plot written in the Heinlein way, with all the good and bad points it entails. There is the usual fabulous prose, the honed wise-cracking comments, the drip-feeding of all those little neat ideas that Heinlein does so well. The plot moves along at a great pace and there’s a lot of tension and suspense along the way.
There’s also the use of a typical strong red-headed Heinlein-gal, with all the ‘Hey, sister’ type comments that the Heinlein character usually has attached to it. These still jar a little, even allowing for the context of the times. Though Mary is fast, intelligent, strong, resourceful and more than capable, there is still a feeling that all she’s there for is to serve the needs of our Hero, Sam. This is not by far the worst example of this by RAH – later novels do it much more – but it is more noticeable in this souped-up, more risqué version.
This is perhaps where I see a transition between the juveniles and say, Stranger in a Strange Land: this still has the excitement and the pace of the juvies, but the addition of the posturing lecture seen in later books such as Stranger. That and the need to get naked.
Sometimes ‘more’ can mean ‘less’, and I’m reminded of that, as I was when I read the longer version of Stranger in a Strange Land – I’m in two minds to decide whether this longer Puppet Masters is one of those examples.
Despite this, the tale’s an engaging one and must have shook things up a little when first published in 1951 – 60 years ago. There are parts that are quite good, for all of my complaints.
In summary, though, this is an interesting read: an alien invasion story with some intelligence that shows many of Heinlein’s strengths, but a few of his weaknesses, and sadly more so in this longer version. It is definitely worth reading, though it has to be seen as a product of its time.
January 20, 2020
Earth was being invaded by aliens and the top security agencies were helpless: the aliens were controlling the mind of every person they encountered. So it was up to Sam Cavanaugh, secret agent for a powerful and deadly spy network, to find a way to stop them--which meant he had to be invaded himself!
Sam comes face to face with his first alien controlled human.
The body lay face down; the back of the jacket heaved as if the chest were rising. I first pulled on gloves—agent’s gloves. I could have stirred boiling acid, yet I could feel a coin in the dark and call heads or tails—once gloved, I started to turn him over and undress him.
The back was still heaving; I did not like the look of it—unnatural. I placed a palm between the shoulder blades.
A man’s back is bone and muscle. This was soft and undulating.
It pulsed…
Undercover aliens in the Senate
Gottlieb was still rumbling along about his deep sorrow, but that there came times when old friendship must give way to a higher duty and therefore—The Senate president banged his gavel. “If the senator please!”
Gottlieb looked startled and said, “I do not yield.”
“The senator is not asked to yield. At the request of the President of the United States, because of the importance of what you are saying, the senator is asked to come to the rostrum to speak.”
Gottlieb looked puzzled but there was nothing else he could do. He walked slowly toward the front of the house.
Mary’s chair blocked the little stairway up to the rostrum. Instead of getting quietly out of the way, she bumbled around, turning and picking up the chair, so that she got even more in the way. Gottlieb stopped and she brushed against him. He caught her arm, as much to steady himself as her. She spoke to him and he to her, but no one else could hear the words. Finally they got around each other and he went on to the front of the rostrum.
The Old Man was quivering like a dog in point. Mary looked up at him and nodded. The Old Man said, “Take him!”
I was over that rail in a flying leap, as if I had been wound up like a crossbow. I landed on Gottlieb’s shoulders.
I heard the Old Man shout, “Gloves, son! Gloves!” I did not stop for them. I split the senator’s jacket with my bare hands and I could see the slug pulsing under his shirt. I tore the shirt away and anybody could see it.
Six stereo cameras could not have recorded what happened in the next few seconds. I slugged Gottlieb back of the ear to stop his thrashing. Mary was sitting on his legs. The President was standing over me and pointing, while shouting, “There! There! Now you can all see.” The Senate president was standing stupefied, waggling his gavel.
Robert Heinlein is one of the leaders of Science Fiction. His early works are among the best rated stories. "The Puppet Masters" are the ultimate of invading evil aliens!
Enjoy!
Sam comes face to face with his first alien controlled human.
The body lay face down; the back of the jacket heaved as if the chest were rising. I first pulled on gloves—agent’s gloves. I could have stirred boiling acid, yet I could feel a coin in the dark and call heads or tails—once gloved, I started to turn him over and undress him.
The back was still heaving; I did not like the look of it—unnatural. I placed a palm between the shoulder blades.
A man’s back is bone and muscle. This was soft and undulating.
It pulsed…
Undercover aliens in the Senate
Gottlieb was still rumbling along about his deep sorrow, but that there came times when old friendship must give way to a higher duty and therefore—The Senate president banged his gavel. “If the senator please!”
Gottlieb looked startled and said, “I do not yield.”
“The senator is not asked to yield. At the request of the President of the United States, because of the importance of what you are saying, the senator is asked to come to the rostrum to speak.”
Gottlieb looked puzzled but there was nothing else he could do. He walked slowly toward the front of the house.
Mary’s chair blocked the little stairway up to the rostrum. Instead of getting quietly out of the way, she bumbled around, turning and picking up the chair, so that she got even more in the way. Gottlieb stopped and she brushed against him. He caught her arm, as much to steady himself as her. She spoke to him and he to her, but no one else could hear the words. Finally they got around each other and he went on to the front of the rostrum.
The Old Man was quivering like a dog in point. Mary looked up at him and nodded. The Old Man said, “Take him!”
I was over that rail in a flying leap, as if I had been wound up like a crossbow. I landed on Gottlieb’s shoulders.
I heard the Old Man shout, “Gloves, son! Gloves!” I did not stop for them. I split the senator’s jacket with my bare hands and I could see the slug pulsing under his shirt. I tore the shirt away and anybody could see it.
Six stereo cameras could not have recorded what happened in the next few seconds. I slugged Gottlieb back of the ear to stop his thrashing. Mary was sitting on his legs. The President was standing over me and pointing, while shouting, “There! There! Now you can all see.” The Senate president was standing stupefied, waggling his gavel.
Robert Heinlein is one of the leaders of Science Fiction. His early works are among the best rated stories. "The Puppet Masters" are the ultimate of invading evil aliens!
Enjoy!
April 29, 2025
The Puppet Masters has an interesting premise; a race of alien slugs that attach themselves onto the backs of humans and turn them into a sort of zombie invades the earth. Unfortunately, the premise is about as interesting as this one gets. It repeats a similar pattern to the previous Heinlein book I read recently in that it starts off pretty interesting but then completely loses steam, resulting in a clueless story that drags on tediously, with nothing really happening, as if Heinlein just didn't know where to go with the story.
The extreme sexism present in Heinlein's works is also, for me, impossible to ignore. He degrades and insults women so extensively and so frequently in his books that it actually takes me out of the story. I wouldn't recommend reading this one. If you want to know what I'm taking about regarding the extent of Heinlein's sexism, here is just a small set of examples from this book. Where it's violent dialogue, it's always addressed at a female character. Where it's someone questioning their intellect, it's similarly always a female character speaking. These all come from different pages of the book and are not part of one narrative:
I shook her. "Pay attention, wench."
"Listen, you bloodthirsty little hellion," I snapped, "get back in the car before I break every bone in your body!"
"Why ask me, darling? I don't have an analytical brain."
"Forgive me, darling. I'm weak and womanish."
...she was so blubber fat that I guessed wrong.
"Listen, son--most women are damn fools and children."
She looked up at me, managing to look both stupid and demure. "My, but you're strong, Buddy." I wanted to slap her.
The extreme sexism present in Heinlein's works is also, for me, impossible to ignore. He degrades and insults women so extensively and so frequently in his books that it actually takes me out of the story. I wouldn't recommend reading this one. If you want to know what I'm taking about regarding the extent of Heinlein's sexism, here is just a small set of examples from this book. Where it's violent dialogue, it's always addressed at a female character. Where it's someone questioning their intellect, it's similarly always a female character speaking. These all come from different pages of the book and are not part of one narrative:
I shook her. "Pay attention, wench."
"Listen, you bloodthirsty little hellion," I snapped, "get back in the car before I break every bone in your body!"
"Why ask me, darling? I don't have an analytical brain."
"Forgive me, darling. I'm weak and womanish."
...she was so blubber fat that I guessed wrong.
"Listen, son--most women are damn fools and children."
She looked up at me, managing to look both stupid and demure. "My, but you're strong, Buddy." I wanted to slap her.
October 5, 2015
Well that was a classic bit of vintage SF. Up there with Heinlein's best I would say. Aliens are invading earth in a most insidious way and there's no room for compassion or understanding; it's them or us! For heaven's sake don't try to read anything allegorical into it or you're bound to find issue with it.
Okay, the novel is undeniably dated but it shouldn't jar with most modern readers unless they are particularly sensitive to these things. It does feel like a novel written in the 50's but it is set several decades in the future which might lead some to criticise Heinlein of failing to anticipate the direction social/technological development would take but I think that would be a distraction from the many qualities this book has to offer.
Read it for what it is; a period SF piece full of excitement and suspense. It was just what I needed.
Okay, the novel is undeniably dated but it shouldn't jar with most modern readers unless they are particularly sensitive to these things. It does feel like a novel written in the 50's but it is set several decades in the future which might lead some to criticise Heinlein of failing to anticipate the direction social/technological development would take but I think that would be a distraction from the many qualities this book has to offer.
Read it for what it is; a period SF piece full of excitement and suspense. It was just what I needed.
January 25, 2025
Oh goodie. Watch out for them sluuuuuugs! *stamps around*
A secret agent travels to Iowa (because of course *snickers*) with two colleagues after 6 other secret agents have gone missing. They discover that some kind of alien slug has started taking over humans, right up to the upper echelons. Sadly, the President doesn't really believe it so it's a race against time before the slugs take over the right kind of people that will allow them to take over power and thus, ultimately, the world.
This was written in 1951. The Red Scare. People who were pulling the strings from afar. It is therefore no surprise that it's about someone pulling the strings from afar, hiding in plain sight in order to destroy everything we hold dear and the government not exactly being all too competent. *lol*
Quite an exciting story, especially with the added factor of knowing the historical background against which it has been written.
This won't be replacing my favorite Heinlein, but the author's sharp tongue was definitely at the forefront here to an extent that I was chuckling often.
The action was equally enjoyable and kept one thoroughly engaged in the slug-killing-spree.
I might need a bath now, just like the character(s). *lol*
A secret agent travels to Iowa (because of course *snickers*) with two colleagues after 6 other secret agents have gone missing. They discover that some kind of alien slug has started taking over humans, right up to the upper echelons. Sadly, the President doesn't really believe it so it's a race against time before the slugs take over the right kind of people that will allow them to take over power and thus, ultimately, the world.
This was written in 1951. The Red Scare. People who were pulling the strings from afar. It is therefore no surprise that it's about someone pulling the strings from afar, hiding in plain sight in order to destroy everything we hold dear and the government not exactly being all too competent. *lol*
Quite an exciting story, especially with the added factor of knowing the historical background against which it has been written.
This won't be replacing my favorite Heinlein, but the author's sharp tongue was definitely at the forefront here to an extent that I was chuckling often.
The action was equally enjoyable and kept one thoroughly engaged in the slug-killing-spree.
I might need a bath now, just like the character(s). *lol*
January 27, 2025
Re-Read
I remember reading this years before the atrocious movie was made in the 90's. I so hoped it'd be on the same level of Starship Troopers, but alas. At least we had Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which was a direct rip-off of this Heinlein novel and its success in the early 50's.
Here's the cool bit: Heinlein was just writing a schlock commentary on the Red Communist Scare and the evil winds that blew in McCarthy's era. The fact that it goes on to be a rip-roaring action/spy tale that's very much in tune with the feel of all the war/spy movies and books of the time is just an added bonus. Don't expect it to match today's sensibilities. Indeed, men are real men and women playfully scold or entice them, for good or (seeming) ill. Jury's out for me. I just know it's a product of its time.
I suppose what I like best about this novel is the anti-clothing taboo. Such a funny thing to read, considering the day and age.
As an SF, I think it's well on the level of War of the Worlds, with then-updated sensibilities. It was just a fun ride. For my synesthesia, it comes across like oranges. Uneaten pulp, just the discarded rind, with the texture and pleasant smell of something right from childhood.
Personal note:
If anyone reading my reviews might be interested in reading my own SF, I'm going to be open to DM requests. I think it's about time I get some eyes on them.
Arctunn.com
I remember reading this years before the atrocious movie was made in the 90's. I so hoped it'd be on the same level of Starship Troopers, but alas. At least we had Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which was a direct rip-off of this Heinlein novel and its success in the early 50's.
Here's the cool bit: Heinlein was just writing a schlock commentary on the Red Communist Scare and the evil winds that blew in McCarthy's era. The fact that it goes on to be a rip-roaring action/spy tale that's very much in tune with the feel of all the war/spy movies and books of the time is just an added bonus. Don't expect it to match today's sensibilities. Indeed, men are real men and women playfully scold or entice them, for good or (seeming) ill. Jury's out for me. I just know it's a product of its time.
I suppose what I like best about this novel is the anti-clothing taboo. Such a funny thing to read, considering the day and age.
As an SF, I think it's well on the level of War of the Worlds, with then-updated sensibilities. It was just a fun ride. For my synesthesia, it comes across like oranges. Uneaten pulp, just the discarded rind, with the texture and pleasant smell of something right from childhood.
Personal note:
If anyone reading my reviews might be interested in reading my own SF, I'm going to be open to DM requests. I think it's about time I get some eyes on them.
Arctunn.com
January 1, 2011
This and Glory Road are maybe my favorite Heinlein novels. The movie of this one tried to be true to the story but failed to capture the spark present in this book. One of the better and also most original invasion novels out there.
Update: My attention brought back to this one, so I thought I'd include a "by the way".
If you noted my "shelves" you might have noted I included the "Spy-Fi" shelf for this one. The story is told from the point of view of "Sam" a character who puts me much in mind of the movie spies just coming into vogue at the time. He works for a "super secret" agency that of course "doesn't exist" if you try to find out about it. He also put me in mind of The Man From U.N.C.L.E. a bit in that....you inter HQ through a rare stamp shop where of course if you ask about the agency you'll be told you're crazy and the proprietor will try to sell you a 2 Penny Black.
Anyway, still a great read, usually considered a YA or "Teen" book.
Update: My attention brought back to this one, so I thought I'd include a "by the way".
If you noted my "shelves" you might have noted I included the "Spy-Fi" shelf for this one. The story is told from the point of view of "Sam" a character who puts me much in mind of the movie spies just coming into vogue at the time. He works for a "super secret" agency that of course "doesn't exist" if you try to find out about it. He also put me in mind of The Man From U.N.C.L.E. a bit in that....you inter HQ through a rare stamp shop where of course if you ask about the agency you'll be told you're crazy and the proprietor will try to sell you a 2 Penny Black.
Anyway, still a great read, usually considered a YA or "Teen" book.
February 17, 2026
Check out a spoiler free/spoiler discussion with Deb at Omnivorous Reader HERE.
This is a classic from Heinlein that helped develop the tropes of flying saucers and alien invasion. There is a sense of paranoia that permeates the novel from start to finish. The beginning is fast paced, intriguing and entertaining as our characters investigate a supposed flying saucer landing. The alien parasites make their appearance early on and this is where the paranoia starts. I read the unedited version and there was a bit of a slow down and jerky section about mid-way through, but other than that I enjoyed this one cover to cover. Very well written and influential. B+
This is a classic from Heinlein that helped develop the tropes of flying saucers and alien invasion. There is a sense of paranoia that permeates the novel from start to finish. The beginning is fast paced, intriguing and entertaining as our characters investigate a supposed flying saucer landing. The alien parasites make their appearance early on and this is where the paranoia starts. I read the unedited version and there was a bit of a slow down and jerky section about mid-way through, but other than that I enjoyed this one cover to cover. Very well written and influential. B+
July 4, 2024
4,5⭐️
Класне, комфортне та цікаве чтиво
Класне, комфортне та цікаве чтиво
December 22, 2016
Zumindest in der deutschen Übersetzung liest sich dieser typische 50er Alien-Invasion-Paranoia-SF-Roman so eigenwillig, dass ich von der Handlung oft regelrecht abgelenkt wurde und mehrfach das Buch zuklappte. Hinzu kommen Sprünge und ein höchst eigenwilliger Erzählrhythmus; manche Merkwürdigkeit stellt sich allerdings zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt als gewollt heraus, so die überstürzte Ehe zwischen Sam und Mary. Die anfänglichen Anklänge an das Inzest-Motiv, das später bei Heinlein eine größere Rolle spielen wird, sind dann im Verlauf der Story nicht mehr aufgetaucht, vielleicht habe ich ja das Gras wachsen hören. Jedenfalls sind Sam und Mary keine Geschwister, auch wenn sie sich zu Beginn zwecks Tarnung als solche ausgeben.
Mein Eindruck ist, dass dieser Roman in jedem Fall im Original gelesen werden sollte, weil letztlich nur dann zu beurteilen ist, welche Eigenheiten der Übersetzung geschuldet sind und welche Heinlein beabsichtigt hat.
Mein Eindruck ist, dass dieser Roman in jedem Fall im Original gelesen werden sollte, weil letztlich nur dann zu beurteilen ist, welche Eigenheiten der Übersetzung geschuldet sind und welche Heinlein beabsichtigt hat.
June 27, 2020
An alien parasitic life form invades Earth gaining control of human bodies. A secret government agency investigates as the world becomes aware of the problem and attempts to eliminate the invaders. Mankind will never be the same.
July 27, 2016
Últimamente en mis reseñas describo lo que me ha parecido la obra con una frase o más bien una palabra; en éste caso sería: una obra IMPRESCINDIBLE para cualquier lector en general, y para los amantes del género en particular.
El porqué, pues por ser un gran libro con una excelente historia, bien narrado y construido, con un ritmo envidiable y un excelente desarrollo, interesante en todas sus partes y a lo largo de la obra sin desfallecer en ningún momento, con unos buenos personajes, eso en general, y en particular ( para el género) por ser un poco el ABC de la invasiones extraterrestres; por tanto, Heinlein (como siempre) acaba siendo con ésta obra el precursor de los posteriores “homenajes” a tan estimables obras cómo: Alien, Aliens, La cosa, La invasión de los ladrones de cuerpos, incluído James Bond ...por nombrar unos cuantos títulos.
Pero voy allá con unas pinceladas de la novela que quiero destacar y su argumento...
Nos situamos en el año 2007, cuando uno de los mejores agentes del servicio secreto de inteligencia de EEUU, “Sam Cavanaugh es enviado junto a una compañera “Mary” por su jefe, “El viejo” (todo ésta comillado por un sentido pero no voy a hacer spolier, lo tendréis que leer), el cual se añade como tercer miembro y testigo directo, a una expedición para investigar el aterrizaje, supuestamente falso en Iwoa, de un platillo volante. Desde ése preciso momento, se nos adentra en la investigación en terreno y científica, posterior estrategia militar y política, la toma de decisiones ( no siempre populares), los conflictos personales de nuestros tres principales protagonistas y la lucha por la supervivencia para el posterior fin de la invasión y bien común; además , la obra incluye un romance. Cómo se puede ver es un gran ejercicio de acción, ciencia ficción, política, estrategia militar y amor.
Cosas que destacó aparte de lo mencionado en generalidad de la novela:
1/ Sus personajes:
Sam, se nos plantea a priori cómo un tipo duro (pelo machista y sexista), de vuelta de casi todo, un pelo adicto a ciertas drogas exóticas y futuristas, y en el que prima por encima de todo su lealtad al departamento. Pero bajo toda ésa estela, nos encontramos con un hombre solitario, con carencias afectivas que cubre con su servicio al estado.
Mary, a priori es una chica exuberante, con unas aptitudes para el combate fuera de lo normal. Pero detrás de eso se oculta un corazón solitario, que quiere hacerse la dura, con un pasado dramático y con las mismas carencias que Sam.
El viejo, es un tipo de mucho cuidado, taimado y manipulador, que nunca hace nada sin un propósito oculto, pero en el fondo es un sentimental, un patriota y un idealista.
2/ El punto de vista de un infectado:
Se nos describe en primera persona el punto de vista de un infectado a nivel de acción y pensamiento.
3/ La doble lectura de la novela:
Bajo la “aparente” simplicidad y primera lectura, Heinlein nos hace una critica al tiempo de se mofa de casi todo. Unos ejemplos:
- Crítica del carácter cerrado, egocéntrico con unas prolongadas y sofistas deducciones de los científicos vs la practicidad de los hombres de acción. Quiero hacer una especial mención a un pasaje de dos científicos con unos diálogos los cuales me han parecido un guiño por parte del autor a un compañero de profesión, Asimov.
- Crítica a la TV (Dios, si levantase Heinlein ahora la cabeza..) el porqué del llamado progreso y su función.
- Mofa de las lecciones preconcebidas de un rango militar y lo dado por hecho.
- El símil que hace entre invasores y fascismo (control de la comunicaciones y las personas)
- Crítica a la política y sus protocolos, la falsedad burocrática e intereses. Mención especial a la fina ironía que nos plantea a los congresistas y su parecido con los alienígenas invasores .
- También se menciona al maltrato animal ( y a la tauromaquia)
4/ La redacción:
Una escritura envidiable que nos hace reír, llorar, entretenernos e interesarnos por el devenir de los acontecimientos futuros. Se combinan descripciones graciosas que dan un respiro a la acción.
Por otro lado, los diálogos son irónicos, sentidos, duros y también picantes y sexuales (sin caer en lo grosero) cuando lo requiere la ocasión.
5/ La posible descripción del invasor:
No voy a spoilear pero me ha gustado, ni es excesiva ni se queda corta, y esta bien ideada
6/ Las frases:
-Hay muchas frases que no tienen desperdicio. Ejemplo: “Son dos empollones comparando su colección de sellos [..]” descripción de los científicos.
- “ No fui consciente hasta entonces de que nunca había sido feliz. Sí, alguna vez estuve vagamente interesado en algo, entretenido o distraído, pero nunca feliz” . Descripción del amor de uno de los protagonistas
Y cómo éstas varias y en varios apartados.
7/ (ésta es subjetiva) los gatos:
Cómo en toda obra de Heinlein aparece un gato y sus metáforas gatunas.
No hay nada perfecto, por lo tanto quiero incluir un apartado que sería de peros, pero más bien lo describiré así..
Lo que no hay que tenerle en cuenta al bueno de Heinlein:
1/ Su obsesión por el comunismo en la obra. Toda persona tiene unas tendencias y ha vivido en un tiempo, y la persona que somos es un cúmulo de vivencias (recordemos que era militar)
2/ Su aparente machismo. Yo no me sentido ofendida como ser femenino. Es más provocación que otra cosa, pero en el fondo se ve que Heinlein admiraba a las mujeres, las sabías más inteligentes y capaces que los hombres, por lo tanto conscientes de sus armas femeninas y cerebrales. Y los deja muy claro en unas cuantas frases.
2.1 Y el aparente placer de obediencia la chica. Yo no lo comparto pero oye, no pasa nada, hay mujeres que les gusta sentirse protegidas por el hombre que aman y el cual la quiere resguardar.
3/ Su primer y aparente cliché de personajes sexistas con patrones muy definidos ( como hablo en el párrafo de personajes) hay mucho más en lo que hurgar que en lo que en un principio parece. La obra de Heinlein es siempre así, nunca te quedes con la simple lectura.
4/ Por último, su obsesión camuflada por el nudismo..jeje. A él le hubiese gustado vivir así, está en más de un relato suyo. ¿Creéis que una persona fascista tendría ésas tendencias? No yo. Lo digo por lo que siempre se le ha tildado de eso. Me creo que era más patriota que otra cosa, puede parecer una línea delgada, pero yo creo que es perfectamente visible.
En conclusión, me ha vuelto a encantar retomar la obra de Heinlein. Un relato prácticamente redondo ( no hay nada perfecto). Por lo que a mí respecta, A Titán con usted!..y gracias por deleitarme con un relato con un encanto, si bien diferente a la magnífica ‘Puerta al verano’, igualmente imprescindible en mis estanterías del género.
Mi puntuación, como no, un cinco.
El porqué, pues por ser un gran libro con una excelente historia, bien narrado y construido, con un ritmo envidiable y un excelente desarrollo, interesante en todas sus partes y a lo largo de la obra sin desfallecer en ningún momento, con unos buenos personajes, eso en general, y en particular ( para el género) por ser un poco el ABC de la invasiones extraterrestres; por tanto, Heinlein (como siempre) acaba siendo con ésta obra el precursor de los posteriores “homenajes” a tan estimables obras cómo: Alien, Aliens, La cosa, La invasión de los ladrones de cuerpos, incluído James Bond ...por nombrar unos cuantos títulos.
Pero voy allá con unas pinceladas de la novela que quiero destacar y su argumento...
Nos situamos en el año 2007, cuando uno de los mejores agentes del servicio secreto de inteligencia de EEUU, “Sam Cavanaugh es enviado junto a una compañera “Mary” por su jefe, “El viejo” (todo ésta comillado por un sentido pero no voy a hacer spolier, lo tendréis que leer), el cual se añade como tercer miembro y testigo directo, a una expedición para investigar el aterrizaje, supuestamente falso en Iwoa, de un platillo volante. Desde ése preciso momento, se nos adentra en la investigación en terreno y científica, posterior estrategia militar y política, la toma de decisiones ( no siempre populares), los conflictos personales de nuestros tres principales protagonistas y la lucha por la supervivencia para el posterior fin de la invasión y bien común; además , la obra incluye un romance. Cómo se puede ver es un gran ejercicio de acción, ciencia ficción, política, estrategia militar y amor.
Cosas que destacó aparte de lo mencionado en generalidad de la novela:
1/ Sus personajes:
Sam, se nos plantea a priori cómo un tipo duro (pelo machista y sexista), de vuelta de casi todo, un pelo adicto a ciertas drogas exóticas y futuristas, y en el que prima por encima de todo su lealtad al departamento. Pero bajo toda ésa estela, nos encontramos con un hombre solitario, con carencias afectivas que cubre con su servicio al estado.
Mary, a priori es una chica exuberante, con unas aptitudes para el combate fuera de lo normal. Pero detrás de eso se oculta un corazón solitario, que quiere hacerse la dura, con un pasado dramático y con las mismas carencias que Sam.
El viejo, es un tipo de mucho cuidado, taimado y manipulador, que nunca hace nada sin un propósito oculto, pero en el fondo es un sentimental, un patriota y un idealista.
2/ El punto de vista de un infectado:
Se nos describe en primera persona el punto de vista de un infectado a nivel de acción y pensamiento.
3/ La doble lectura de la novela:
Bajo la “aparente” simplicidad y primera lectura, Heinlein nos hace una critica al tiempo de se mofa de casi todo. Unos ejemplos:
- Crítica del carácter cerrado, egocéntrico con unas prolongadas y sofistas deducciones de los científicos vs la practicidad de los hombres de acción. Quiero hacer una especial mención a un pasaje de dos científicos con unos diálogos los cuales me han parecido un guiño por parte del autor a un compañero de profesión, Asimov.
- Crítica a la TV (Dios, si levantase Heinlein ahora la cabeza..) el porqué del llamado progreso y su función.
- Mofa de las lecciones preconcebidas de un rango militar y lo dado por hecho.
- El símil que hace entre invasores y fascismo (control de la comunicaciones y las personas)
- Crítica a la política y sus protocolos, la falsedad burocrática e intereses. Mención especial a la fina ironía que nos plantea a los congresistas y su parecido con los alienígenas invasores .
- También se menciona al maltrato animal ( y a la tauromaquia)
4/ La redacción:
Una escritura envidiable que nos hace reír, llorar, entretenernos e interesarnos por el devenir de los acontecimientos futuros. Se combinan descripciones graciosas que dan un respiro a la acción.
Por otro lado, los diálogos son irónicos, sentidos, duros y también picantes y sexuales (sin caer en lo grosero) cuando lo requiere la ocasión.
5/ La posible descripción del invasor:
No voy a spoilear pero me ha gustado, ni es excesiva ni se queda corta, y esta bien ideada
6/ Las frases:
-Hay muchas frases que no tienen desperdicio. Ejemplo: “Son dos empollones comparando su colección de sellos [..]” descripción de los científicos.
- “ No fui consciente hasta entonces de que nunca había sido feliz. Sí, alguna vez estuve vagamente interesado en algo, entretenido o distraído, pero nunca feliz” . Descripción del amor de uno de los protagonistas
Y cómo éstas varias y en varios apartados.
7/ (ésta es subjetiva) los gatos:
Cómo en toda obra de Heinlein aparece un gato y sus metáforas gatunas.
No hay nada perfecto, por lo tanto quiero incluir un apartado que sería de peros, pero más bien lo describiré así..
Lo que no hay que tenerle en cuenta al bueno de Heinlein:
1/ Su obsesión por el comunismo en la obra. Toda persona tiene unas tendencias y ha vivido en un tiempo, y la persona que somos es un cúmulo de vivencias (recordemos que era militar)
2/ Su aparente machismo. Yo no me sentido ofendida como ser femenino. Es más provocación que otra cosa, pero en el fondo se ve que Heinlein admiraba a las mujeres, las sabías más inteligentes y capaces que los hombres, por lo tanto conscientes de sus armas femeninas y cerebrales. Y los deja muy claro en unas cuantas frases.
2.1 Y el aparente placer de obediencia la chica. Yo no lo comparto pero oye, no pasa nada, hay mujeres que les gusta sentirse protegidas por el hombre que aman y el cual la quiere resguardar.
3/ Su primer y aparente cliché de personajes sexistas con patrones muy definidos ( como hablo en el párrafo de personajes) hay mucho más en lo que hurgar que en lo que en un principio parece. La obra de Heinlein es siempre así, nunca te quedes con la simple lectura.
4/ Por último, su obsesión camuflada por el nudismo..jeje. A él le hubiese gustado vivir así, está en más de un relato suyo. ¿Creéis que una persona fascista tendría ésas tendencias? No yo. Lo digo por lo que siempre se le ha tildado de eso. Me creo que era más patriota que otra cosa, puede parecer una línea delgada, pero yo creo que es perfectamente visible.
En conclusión, me ha vuelto a encantar retomar la obra de Heinlein. Un relato prácticamente redondo ( no hay nada perfecto). Por lo que a mí respecta, A Titán con usted!..y gracias por deleitarme con un relato con un encanto, si bien diferente a la magnífica ‘Puerta al verano’, igualmente imprescindible en mis estanterías del género.
Mi puntuación, como no, un cinco.
March 22, 2025
Чергова данина підлітковому читанню. З тих пір багато що підзабулось, більше навіть пам'ятаю сцени із класичної екранізації книги, із Дональдом Сазерлендом, тому читання все ж таки було майже як в перший раз. Про сюжет не буду багато писати, в анотації все є, я лише хотів би підкреслити пару інших моментів.
Книгу було написано в 1951 році, і цікаво було читати про технічні досягнення 2007 року (саме тоді й розгортаються події роману) очима автора середини минулого століття - стереострічки, вуличні принтери для друкування газет, літаючі машини, вживлений аудіочіп для зв'язку, і та-дам.. - переносний телефон, аналог наших мобільників! Гайнлайн передбачив їх появу за 30 років до перших мобільних цеглинок, і за 40 - до тих, які вже зручно носити в кишені.
Крім того, із другої половини 40-х повним ходом в світі йшла холодна війна, і автор на момент написання книги (1951 рік) завершив протистояння західної цивілізації та комуністичного світу таким чином - та сама залізна завіса, про яку оголосив Черчіль у своїй Фултонській промові, перетворилась до 2007 року на таку собі Завісу, яка відгородила СРСР та Китай від решти світу (тут прямо не сказано, але схоже на те, що це аналог Берлінської стіни, тобто напевно щось матеріальне.) І він описує, яким чином зараження відбувалося би там, за Завісою (на той час Сталін ще був живий, він помре у 1953 році):
Любовна лінія мені тут також сподобалась, в фільмі вона не так яскраво виражена, а тут все було гарно, та й взагалі роман класний, з легким гумором та іронією. Гайнлайн - один із кращих фантастів минулого століття, що є, то є.
Книгу було написано в 1951 році, і цікаво було читати про технічні досягнення 2007 року (саме тоді й розгортаються події роману) очима автора середини минулого століття - стереострічки, вуличні принтери для друкування газет, літаючі машини, вживлений аудіочіп для зв'язку, і та-дам.. - переносний телефон, аналог наших мобільників! Гайнлайн передбачив їх появу за 30 років до перших мобільних цеглинок, і за 40 - до тих, які вже зручно носити в кишені.
Крім того, із другої половини 40-х повним ходом в світі йшла холодна війна, і автор на момент написання книги (1951 рік) завершив протистояння західної цивілізації та комуністичного світу таким чином - та сама залізна завіса, про яку оголосив Черчіль у своїй Фултонській промові, перетворилась до 2007 року на таку собі Завісу, яка відгородила СРСР та Китай від решти світу (тут прямо не сказано, але схоже на те, що це аналог Берлінської стіни, тобто напевно щось матеріальне.) І він описує, яким чином зараження відбувалося би там, за Завісою (на той час Сталін ще був живий, він помре у 1953 році):
Мені було дивно, чому титанці спершу не напали на Росію, бо сталінізм немовби навмисне був створений саме для них. І тут я засумнівався - а може, вони все ж таки напали на Росію? Поміркувавши ще ретельніше, я вирішив, що насправді слимакам було все одно: мозок людей за Завісою перебував у полоні власних "слимаків" ось уже три покоління поспіль. І тому не було різниці ані на копійку між комісаром зі слимаком і комісаром без слимака.В інеті я знайшов текст видання 1992 року, ще російською, скоріш за все його я і читав свого часу, і там жодного слова про Завісу, комісарів, "радянців", і моментів, подібних до цитати вище, не було - вирізали. Тобто зараз я вперше прочитав повний варіант книги, без купюр.
Любовна лінія мені тут також сподобалась, в фільмі вона не так яскраво виражена, а тут все було гарно, та й взагалі роман класний, з легким гумором та іронією. Гайнлайн - один із кращих фантастів минулого століття, що є, то є.
May 9, 2015
The Puppet Masters: Early Heinlein at his most embarrassing
Originally posted at Fantasy Literature
Slug-like alien invaders who land and take over Des Moines, Iowa, 50s-style cold war paranoia, wise-cracking secret super agents, and a totally hot red-headed babe with deadly weapons concealed on a voluptuous body who is strong-willed but still totally subservient to our intrepid, tough-talking hero Sam. Yes, that would be a Robert Heinlein book, this one first published back in 1951. Apparently this was the extended version, and I guess they just stuffed back all the embarrassingly-bad, sexy repartee and other bits that should have remained on the cutting-room floor.
Most readers either love or hate Heinlein, and I've only read a few of his books, having absolutely hated Starship Troopers and Stranger in a Strange Land, but really liked The Door Into Summer. So after a 20 year hiatus I decided to give this one a go (with Double Star and The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress on deck). Well, maybe I should have left well enough alone.
I'm afraid this book just really didn't do anything other than induce shivers of discomfort with it's thoroughly dated dialogue and characters. The story itself may seem hackneyed now, but it's been 60 years so I can't lay that at Heinlein's feet. But the plot itself just completely stalls partway through the book, as what I would expect to be the finale comes in the middle, and so I couldn't bother myself to read any further.
We all know that the attitudes toward women were pretty cavalier and sexist back in the Golden Age of SF, but this book really took the cake. Here's a few choice tidbits to make a reader cringe:
"I like nurses; they are calm and earthy and very tolerant. Miss Briggs, my night nurse, was not the mouth-watering job that Doris was; she had a face like a jaundiced horse but she had a fine figure for a woman her age, hard and well cared for."
"She took a deep drag, swelling out her chest and pushing her arrogant breasts against her halter almost to the breaking point. I thought again what a sweet dish she was; she was just what I needed to take my mind off Mary."
"Listen, son, most women are damn fools and children. But they've got more range than we've got. The brave ones are braver, the good ones are better and the vile ones are viler, for that matter."
To sum up, I really didn't find much to like in this book, but perhaps teenage boys in the 1950's really liked it. Plus, this being the extended version (96,000 words vs. the original 60,000), maybe shorter in this case was better. But I won't waste any more precious reading time finding out.
Originally posted at Fantasy Literature
Slug-like alien invaders who land and take over Des Moines, Iowa, 50s-style cold war paranoia, wise-cracking secret super agents, and a totally hot red-headed babe with deadly weapons concealed on a voluptuous body who is strong-willed but still totally subservient to our intrepid, tough-talking hero Sam. Yes, that would be a Robert Heinlein book, this one first published back in 1951. Apparently this was the extended version, and I guess they just stuffed back all the embarrassingly-bad, sexy repartee and other bits that should have remained on the cutting-room floor.
Most readers either love or hate Heinlein, and I've only read a few of his books, having absolutely hated Starship Troopers and Stranger in a Strange Land, but really liked The Door Into Summer. So after a 20 year hiatus I decided to give this one a go (with Double Star and The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress on deck). Well, maybe I should have left well enough alone.
I'm afraid this book just really didn't do anything other than induce shivers of discomfort with it's thoroughly dated dialogue and characters. The story itself may seem hackneyed now, but it's been 60 years so I can't lay that at Heinlein's feet. But the plot itself just completely stalls partway through the book, as what I would expect to be the finale comes in the middle, and so I couldn't bother myself to read any further.
We all know that the attitudes toward women were pretty cavalier and sexist back in the Golden Age of SF, but this book really took the cake. Here's a few choice tidbits to make a reader cringe:
"I like nurses; they are calm and earthy and very tolerant. Miss Briggs, my night nurse, was not the mouth-watering job that Doris was; she had a face like a jaundiced horse but she had a fine figure for a woman her age, hard and well cared for."
"She took a deep drag, swelling out her chest and pushing her arrogant breasts against her halter almost to the breaking point. I thought again what a sweet dish she was; she was just what I needed to take my mind off Mary."
"Listen, son, most women are damn fools and children. But they've got more range than we've got. The brave ones are braver, the good ones are better and the vile ones are viler, for that matter."
To sum up, I really didn't find much to like in this book, but perhaps teenage boys in the 1950's really liked it. Plus, this being the extended version (96,000 words vs. the original 60,000), maybe shorter in this case was better. But I won't waste any more precious reading time finding out.
September 28, 2021
Notes:
Yay for libraries!
For a book that was written in 1951, the story held up well. A story full of suspense, irrational fears, psychological trauma and hectic defense against an alien invasion. The narration was not the best, but I still managed to envision the story as it unfolded.
Yay for libraries!
For a book that was written in 1951, the story held up well. A story full of suspense, irrational fears, psychological trauma and hectic defense against an alien invasion. The narration was not the best, but I still managed to envision the story as it unfolded.
August 5, 2017
-Paranoia y misoginia por la realidad de su tiempo.-
Género. Ciencia ficción.
Lo que nos cuenta. En el libro Amos de títeres (publicación original: The Puppet Masters, 1951) nos trasladamos a un supuesto 2007 en el que, y tras una guerra nuclear limitada, tiene lugar una nueva Guerra Fría. Cuando aterriza en Iowa un ovni, los primeros agentes del servicio secreto enviados a investigar el evento pierden el contacto con la central. Cuando otros tres son enviados, incluyendo al líder de un grupo muy exclusivo y totalmente desconocido para el gran público, descubren que unas criaturas alienígenas procedentes de una de las lunas de Saturno se están uniendo a seres humanos en la parte de la espalda entre los omóplatos y, además de controlar a las personas, están empezando a controlar el territorio alrededor de la zona de aterrizaje.
¿Quiere saber más de este libro, sin spoilers? Visite:
http://librosdeolethros.blogspot.com/...
Género. Ciencia ficción.
Lo que nos cuenta. En el libro Amos de títeres (publicación original: The Puppet Masters, 1951) nos trasladamos a un supuesto 2007 en el que, y tras una guerra nuclear limitada, tiene lugar una nueva Guerra Fría. Cuando aterriza en Iowa un ovni, los primeros agentes del servicio secreto enviados a investigar el evento pierden el contacto con la central. Cuando otros tres son enviados, incluyendo al líder de un grupo muy exclusivo y totalmente desconocido para el gran público, descubren que unas criaturas alienígenas procedentes de una de las lunas de Saturno se están uniendo a seres humanos en la parte de la espalda entre los omóplatos y, además de controlar a las personas, están empezando a controlar el territorio alrededor de la zona de aterrizaje.
¿Quiere saber más de este libro, sin spoilers? Visite:
http://librosdeolethros.blogspot.com/...
October 23, 2014
The audio reading was pretty good, but I didn't care for the story as much as I recall. There was so much dated about it, both the technology & the sexism.
Heinlein's never been great at characterization - some have said he only has one main one & I think they have a good point. In this one, we saw that character as a 30 year old & an older version, plus a sort of female one. Mary was tough, but too much the demur 50's gal from the ads. The technology was kind of fun in a pulp way. Phones embedded under the skin, for instance. They sounded bulky, though.
This book just didn't hold up nearly as well as some of his juveniles that I've read recently.
Heinlein's never been great at characterization - some have said he only has one main one & I think they have a good point. In this one, we saw that character as a 30 year old & an older version, plus a sort of female one. Mary was tough, but too much the demur 50's gal from the ads. The technology was kind of fun in a pulp way. Phones embedded under the skin, for instance. They sounded bulky, though.
This book just didn't hold up nearly as well as some of his juveniles that I've read recently.
December 19, 2018
10/10. Media de los 45 libros que he leído del autor : 8/10
Heinlein fue de mis primeros amores absolutos en la CF (junto con Asimov y Farmer). La mayoría de los 45 libros que he leído suyos fueron antes de 1992. Lo devoré.
Alguno que he leído ya de más mayorcito no ha tenido el mismo aprecio que en esa juventud, pero sigo guardando mucho cariño a este Gran Maestro por lo que hizo por la CF y por mi aprecio hacia este género y hacia la lectura en general.
Huelga decir que esta nota fue puesta en esa juventud lectora y que hoy tal vez fuese otra. Pero se queda ese 10 rotundo.
Heinlein fue de mis primeros amores absolutos en la CF (junto con Asimov y Farmer). La mayoría de los 45 libros que he leído suyos fueron antes de 1992. Lo devoré.
Alguno que he leído ya de más mayorcito no ha tenido el mismo aprecio que en esa juventud, pero sigo guardando mucho cariño a este Gran Maestro por lo que hizo por la CF y por mi aprecio hacia este género y hacia la lectura en general.
Huelga decir que esta nota fue puesta en esa juventud lectora y que hoy tal vez fuese otra. Pero se queda ese 10 rotundo.
November 23, 2018
Solider Invasionsroman des Libertären unter den klassisch gewordenen Sci-Fi-Autoren: Freiheit ist stets gefährdet und immer umkämpft.
“Der Preis für die Freiheit ist die Bereitschaft, sich unverzüglich, überall, jederzeit und rücksichtslos zum Kampf zu stellen.” (S. 299). Recht hat er.
“Der Preis für die Freiheit ist die Bereitschaft, sich unverzüglich, überall, jederzeit und rücksichtslos zum Kampf zu stellen.” (S. 299). Recht hat er.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 947 reviews