I read this for our Library Book Club and, honestly, at first I thought it was going to be difficult to get through. I found a chronological gaffe in the first few pages, and the narrative was--at first--mediocre, so I figured I'd just get through it for the sake of the meeting coming up.
However, the story line/narrative did pick up and I did get to a place where I wanted to know how it ended, so that's good! But there were other editorial issues throughout the book--missing words, naming the character as Jake when it should have been Patterson in a certain paragraph--but nothing so bad that I couldn't finish the book. (I've been a proofreader, so these things catch my attention.) There were other stereotypical phrases used that I felt could have been written differently (like, the trooper was given a task to do, "puffed out his chest" and said he would get it done. Really? I think I did an eyeroll over that one.), but altogether it wasn't a bad read. I did like the short chapters, for some reason I haven't identified yet.
For those who ask: no language issues and no gratuitous sex.
Would I read it again? I don't know...maybe? It wasn't that bad of a read, once I got through the first part. Would I recommend it? Probably.