The standard view in scholarship is that disease in Lucretius' De rerum natura is mainly a problem to be solved and then dispensed with.However, a closer reading suggests that things are more layered and complex than they appear at first just as morbus causes a radical rearrangement of atoms in the body and makes the patient engage with alternative and up to that point unknown dimensions of the sensible world, so does disease as a theme generate a multiplicity of meanings in the text. The present book argues for a reconsideration of morbus in De rerum natura along those it invites the reader to revisit the topic of disease and reflect on the various, and often contrasting, discourses that unfold around it. More specifically, it illustrates how, apart from calling for therapy, disease, due to its dominant presence in the narrative, transforms at the same time into a concept that is integral both to the poem’s philosophical agenda but also to its wider aesthetic concerns as a literary product.The book thus sheds new light on De rerum natura's intense preoccupation with morbus by showing how disease is not exclusively conceived by Lucretius as a blind, obliterating force but is crucially linked to life and meaning—both inside and outside the text.
George Kazantzidis (BA, Thessaloniki 2002) is Assistant Professor of Latin Literature at the University of Patras, Greece; he has also been working as an Adjunct Lecturer in Latin at the Open University of Cyprus. George obtained his PhD degree from the University of Oxford (2011) with a thesis on melancholia in Hellenistic and Latin Poetry. His interests lie primarily in the intersections between ancient medicine and poetry, with special emphasis on the history of mental illness. In 2012-13 he worked as a Junior Research Associate in Prof. A.Chaniotis ERC-project: ‘The Social and Cultural Construction of Emotions: The Greek Paradigm’. Forthcoming articles include a discussion of doctors’ medical language in Greek and Roman comedy and a reassessment of Callimachus’ Acontius and Cydippe (Aetia fr.75) through the lens of Hippocratic gynaecology.