I had high hopes for this book. As an unpublished author myself, I always read books in my basic genre in two ways. One, just as any reader, enjoying it or not, but also as a writer. Does this element work? Why or why not? Could it have been done better, or more to the point, could I do it better? That sort of thing.
It sounds like I’m super critical, but not really. I’m trying to learn, mostly.
So.
I found the first book in the series, gobbled it up with enjoyment, then rapidly moved on to the second and had to wait a couple of days, then pretty much inhaled the third.
So yes, I enjoyed the books, well . . . until the third.
And I admit, had there been the normal amount of time in between them, my noticing of some glaring plot point issues might not have been quite so intense.
But really, Jenny Colgan? Did you think people wouldn’t notice that a woman who does a home pregnancy test that tells her she’s three weeks or so pregnant early in December, is suddenly 12-13 weeks pregnant two weeks later?
Did you think that a major plot point in an earlier book, that the reason Mark and Marsha didn’t adopt Joel when he was young was because they too, had young children at the time . . . Has now vanished in book three? Now they are childless and regretted their decision. They regret their decision in the earlier book, too, but for a very plausible reason! Now to make them childless means they were just plain weak willed when it would have counted for Joel to have parents. There were better ways to handle THAT!
And then there’s the horrible stereotypes that the author indulges in. Texans are all types. I know to give Tripp a story arc you felt the need to paint him in the WORST possible way, but honestly it’s very, very lazy. I can handle the way the author paints Jan, because I expect she’ll have a moment in a later book where she finally, finally, is decent. But be careful, if she’s so horrid, then once again you are indulging in a stereotype to no end.
Additionally, the timing is pretty off in the book. Timelines are important in series, especially and in a few instances they are muddled or stretched out, again just pointing out a laziness.
The biggest glaring one is our heroine starts book one at age 26, then in way less than two years, she’s magically become 31. Really? How could you not think through these things when you began the book?
This book feels like it was rushed through editing with no sharp eyes on it. It’s published by a major house, but is riddled with typos, both spelling and grammar. I assume the author has a series bible, but it certainly wasn’t consulted as the issues above point out. There are a few others, too, along these lines.
The last issue I had with the book and the second in the series, too, is that it’s long on interior monologue and backstory and musings, but short on plot. Yes, you need to have some of the interior. . . But you have to be careful not to “head hop” or bog things down too much. Another reviewer noted this, too, that although things do happen, you get very little local color and not much of a Christmas-y feel. I think that when you jump into a character’s head and have them remember every little thing that leads up to what’s about to come out of their mouth, that’s a problem. Show, don’t tell (too much).
So I don’t think this book got the care it deserved, although there are still charming moments, and very touching ones, too. It gets two stars for a mostly satisfying conclusion.