What do you think?
Rate this book


272 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1995
“Q: There is much interest these days in understanding nondualism. Some teachers say that is all that is needed. What is the difference between the way your father taught and Advaita Vedānta? A: My father said about advaita, and I quote, “The word advaita has two parts, a - and dvaita .” So to realize advaita we should first realize dvaita. It is a very interesting idea. In other words, to realize advaita, nondualism, one must first realize dvaita, dualism. We must start with the reality of our situation. Most of us are in dualism, and we have to accept duality and start from duality before it can become one, before we can know nonduality. Imagine: if there were only one, then there would not be the word or the concept of advaita. The concept of advaita itself implies two. Yoga links the two and through this link the two become one. That is advaita. So yoga is the step toward advaita. The two must be recognized, then brought together, otherwise even the advaita idea becomes an object. The moment I say I am an Advaitin, I am making the word advaita into an object and I create division in myself. Yoga is the method and the approach to make this great realization a reality. That is why the greatest teacher of Advaita Vedañta, commented on the Yoga Sūtra , explaining the importance of yoga and emphasizing the importance of such things as nāda [sound] and bandha [a body lock]. He spoke of yoga as an important means for reaching that goal called advaita.”
“Now what is this avidyā that is so deeply rooted in us? Avidyā can be understood as the accumulated result of our many unconscious actions, the actions and ways of perceiving that we have been mechanically carrying out for years. As a result of these unconscious responses, the mind becomes more and more dependent on habits until we accept the actions of yesterday as the norms of today. Such habituation in our action and perception is called saṃskāra . These habits cover the mind with avidyā, as if obscuring the clarity of consciousness with a filmy layer.”