Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Tangled Field: Barbara McClintock's Search for the Patterns of Genetic Control

Rate this book
This biographical study illuminates one of the most important yet misunderstood figures in the history of science. Barbara McClintock (1902-1992), a geneticist who integrated classical genetics with microscopic observations of the behavior of chromosomes, was regarded as a genius and as an unorthodox, nearly incomprehensible thinker. In 1946, she discovered mobile genetic elements, which she called "controlling elements." Thirty-seven years later, she won a Nobel Prize for this work, becoming the third woman to receive an unshared Nobel in science. Since then, McClintock has become an emblem of feminine scientific thinking and the tragedy of narrow-mindedness and bias in science.

Using McClintock's research notes, newly available correspondence, and dozens of interviews with McClintock and others, Comfort argues that McClintock's work was neither ignored in the 1950s nor wholly accepted two decades later. Nor was McClintock marginalized by scientists; throughout the decades of her alleged rejection, she remained a distinguished figure in her field. Comfort replaces the "McClintock myth" with a new story, rich with implications for our understanding of women in science and scientific creativity.

368 pages, Paperback

First published June 30, 2001

4 people are currently reading
117 people want to read

About the author

Nathaniel C. Comfort

4 books3 followers
Nathaniel Charles Comfort (born 1962) is an American historian specializing in the history of biology. He is an associate professor in the Institute of the History of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4 (17%)
4 stars
8 (34%)
3 stars
7 (30%)
2 stars
3 (13%)
1 star
1 (4%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Luke Spooner.
538 reviews4 followers
September 11, 2019
I didn't enjoy this book. The tone was really weird and the explanation of the science required more figures and tables.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.