What do you think?
Rate this book


288 pages, Hardcover
First published October 26, 2021
Compared to Orange County, Osceola sees very little pressure from organized advocates and has fewer disposable resources to address its chronic housing needs, so its response has been even more low-key. Over the years, I have watched the county’s planners play the cards available to them. They have simplified building and parking regulations, streamlined the building permitting process, lowered impact and mobility fees for smaller, cheaper, and more densely located units, and facilitated adaptive reuse, especially of motels and ghost malls. They have also tried to lure out-of-town developers to build more diverse and compact housing products rather than the business-as-usual subdivisions of tract homes on freshly bulldozed greenfields. And they have encouraged the county to cobble together funds to subsidize the building of a few affordable complexes. But even with access to bigger pots of government assistance, the supply of privately built affordable residences is guaranteed to lag far behind demand.
Conventional nuclear families, for example, are increasingly thin on the ground these days, while multigenerational units, including the “grandfamily” (in which children are raised by their grandparents), extended or reconstituted families, and other forms of shared living are on the rise. Meanwhile, the dispersal of employment options far outside of the public workplace means that more and more people require homes that can accommodate income-generating activities. New paradigms of public and social housing should reflect these diverse arrangements by incorporating cohousing, granny flats, communes, single-room occupancies, intergenerational group dwellings, and a range of hybrid quarters that anticipate and facilitate how we are likely to occupy, as well as earn a living in, our homes. Risk-averse developers are loath to build for this kind of variety because it upsets their established formulas for profit. The next generation of American housing must take on that challenge. But it will only succeed if it is genuinely centered on people's needs and aspirations.
If Congress wants to help fix this problem, it could begin by withholding federal infrastructure funds from states and localities that fail to implement land use policies that equalize treatment of and promote market rate, economical housing.