Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Ecocritical Geopolitics: Popular culture and environmental discourse

Rate this book
What is the role of popular culture in shaping our discourse about the multifaceted system of material things, subjects and causal agents that we call "environment"? Ecocritical Geopolitics offers a new theoretical perspective and approach to the analysis of environmental discourse in popular culture. It combines ecocriticial and critical geopolitical approaches to explore three main dystopian visions, the relationship between the human, post-human, and "nature" and speciesism and carnism.

The importance of popular culture in the construction of geopolitical discourse is widely recognized. From ecocriticism, we also appreciate that literature, cinema, or theatre can offer a mirror of what the individual author wants to communicate about the relationship between the human being and what can be defined as non-human. This book provides an analysis of environmental discourses with the theoretical tools of critical geopolitics and the analytical methodology of ecocriticism. It develops and disseminates a new scientific approach, defined as "ecocritical geopolitics", to offer an idea of the power of popular culture in the realization of environmental discourse.

Referencing sources as diverse as The Road, The Shape of Water, Lady and the Tramp, and TV cooking shows, this book will be of great interest to students and scholars of geography, environmental studies, film studies, and environmental humanities.

228 pages, Kindle Edition

Published May 26, 2021

7 people want to read

About the author

Elena dell'Agnese

10 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
0 (0%)
4 stars
3 (50%)
3 stars
1 (16%)
2 stars
1 (16%)
1 star
1 (16%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Plato .
154 reviews35 followers
May 23, 2022
I disagreed with the author on some major points, but the book is brought down by its horrible writing, weak arguments, bad science, naive anthropology, and boring literary analysis. It felt like reading a bunch of fragmented essays, where the author relies on quotes from other writers to express her opinion. Everything is summed up and expressed through quotes that it became too unbearable. The book served me more as a guide on what I want to avoid in my writing for academia, then as being valuable for my knowledge about nature and the environment.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.