What do you think?
Rate this book
Now, Discover Your Strengths
Marcus Buckingham and Donald O Clifton's Now, Discover Your Strengths proposes a unique approach to managing personnel: focus on enhancing people's strengths rather than eliminating their weaknesses. Effectively managing personnel--as well as one's own behaviour--is an extraordinarily complex task that, not surprisingly, has been the subject of countless books touting what each claims is the true path to success. Following up on the coauthors' popular previous book, First, Break All the Rules, it fully describes 34 positive personality themes the two have formulated (such as Achiever, Developer, Learner, and Maximiser) and explains how to build a "strengths-based organisation" by capitalising on the fact that such traits are already present among those within it.
Most original and potentially most revealing, however, is a Web-based interactive component that allows readers to complete a questionnaire developed by the Gallup Organisation and instantly discover their own top five inborn talents. This device provides a personalised window into the authors' management philosophy which, coupled with subsequent advice, places their suggestions into the kind of practical context that's missing from most similar tomes. "You can't lead a strengths revolution if you don't know how to find, name and develop your own," write Buckingham and Clifton. Their book encourages such introspection while providing knowledgeable guidance for applying its lessons. --Howard Rothman
262 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2001
630 people are currently reading
29603 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 730 reviews
March 11, 2012
Enh.
I've to this one with a solid decade of reading neuroscience and positive psychology behind me, so not only am I already familiar with the research he cites, but I am well aware of when it is misused. Let's just get this out of the way before we discuss any strengths (haha) the book may have, as I have yet to see its weaknesses covered in any of the reviews:
a) it is NOT TRUE that you can't significantly strengthen your weaknesses. Read The Brain that Changes Itself for a good introduction. Saying that most of us DON'T change is NOT the same thing. Even his own statistics don't support him: yes, you can draw a 0.7 to 0.9 correlation between people's scores on personality tests over time, but this is an AVERAGE--there will be some people with a 0.99 correlation and other people with a 0.5 correlation. Some people do change significantly over time, and it is worth discussing how and why, and when this is important. Not to mention that a 0.7 correlation is impressive, but it implies a CHANGE of 0.3--and that's not insignificant. (I've read a few of his books at this point and parts of this are drawn from more than one of them.)
It takes a lot of hard work and effort over a serious amount of time to really change an aspect of personality, and it likely is not worth it if you're trying to tackle something benign like "I hate public speaking." But some people's 'weaknesses' are serious character defects that cause harm to their friends, families and colleagues, and these folks should absolutely be expected to put the time and effort required into real change. Moreover, much research has shown that it CAN be done. So wtf, Buckingham?
b) The ipsative nature of the scoring makes the tool of use only on an individual level, though the author argues that organizations can use this in hiring. Nuh uh. No way.
So, the strengthsfinder gives you your top five strengths in business contexts. Handy, if you're trying to figure out what job to take or a continuing ed course or how to tackle some big project at work. But.
But it doesn't give you a SCORE. Just a list of your top five. Just because you and your best friend both have "empathy" as a top strength doesn't mean you're equally empathic; indeed, just because your best friend's top strength is "empathy" and it doesn't even appear on your top five doesn't mean you're not in fact MORE empathic than your friend. Maybe your best friend is mediocre in everything and even their top strengths are not very strong. This is harmless so long as it is used for self-discovery and planning, but used for hiring and promotions, as Buckingham openly advocates?
Stupidest idea ever. Sorry.
(deep breath)
So, the pluses: it was certainly rigorously researched and the central thesis of focusing on developing strengths rather than correcting weaknesses has a lot to recommend it. Much research backs up their claim that this is a better use of resources for corporations, and that I will buy. I was amused by the test results (I am very good at thinking: I like thinking abstractly, thinking about concepts, thinking about strategies, collecting thoughts, and then, when all of this is done, thinking about my values and beliefs. And yes, those are my top five strengths. They do seem somewhat repetitive, no?) and given previous experience with Seligmen et al's research on character strengths, not entirely convinced by them. I mean, yes, I love thinking--but it's not all I do, not even at work, and I got much more balanced results from less commercially-oriented researchers.
Incidentally, the tests developed by the positive psychology researchers, who are also looking at character strengths and how to focus on them, are available for free on the internet--you don't need to buy the book to take the test. Just an fyi. It's a brilliant marketing strategy but that doesn't make it sound science.
I've to this one with a solid decade of reading neuroscience and positive psychology behind me, so not only am I already familiar with the research he cites, but I am well aware of when it is misused. Let's just get this out of the way before we discuss any strengths (haha) the book may have, as I have yet to see its weaknesses covered in any of the reviews:
a) it is NOT TRUE that you can't significantly strengthen your weaknesses. Read The Brain that Changes Itself for a good introduction. Saying that most of us DON'T change is NOT the same thing. Even his own statistics don't support him: yes, you can draw a 0.7 to 0.9 correlation between people's scores on personality tests over time, but this is an AVERAGE--there will be some people with a 0.99 correlation and other people with a 0.5 correlation. Some people do change significantly over time, and it is worth discussing how and why, and when this is important. Not to mention that a 0.7 correlation is impressive, but it implies a CHANGE of 0.3--and that's not insignificant. (I've read a few of his books at this point and parts of this are drawn from more than one of them.)
It takes a lot of hard work and effort over a serious amount of time to really change an aspect of personality, and it likely is not worth it if you're trying to tackle something benign like "I hate public speaking." But some people's 'weaknesses' are serious character defects that cause harm to their friends, families and colleagues, and these folks should absolutely be expected to put the time and effort required into real change. Moreover, much research has shown that it CAN be done. So wtf, Buckingham?
b) The ipsative nature of the scoring makes the tool of use only on an individual level, though the author argues that organizations can use this in hiring. Nuh uh. No way.
So, the strengthsfinder gives you your top five strengths in business contexts. Handy, if you're trying to figure out what job to take or a continuing ed course or how to tackle some big project at work. But.
But it doesn't give you a SCORE. Just a list of your top five. Just because you and your best friend both have "empathy" as a top strength doesn't mean you're equally empathic; indeed, just because your best friend's top strength is "empathy" and it doesn't even appear on your top five doesn't mean you're not in fact MORE empathic than your friend. Maybe your best friend is mediocre in everything and even their top strengths are not very strong. This is harmless so long as it is used for self-discovery and planning, but used for hiring and promotions, as Buckingham openly advocates?
Stupidest idea ever. Sorry.
(deep breath)
So, the pluses: it was certainly rigorously researched and the central thesis of focusing on developing strengths rather than correcting weaknesses has a lot to recommend it. Much research backs up their claim that this is a better use of resources for corporations, and that I will buy. I was amused by the test results (I am very good at thinking: I like thinking abstractly, thinking about concepts, thinking about strategies, collecting thoughts, and then, when all of this is done, thinking about my values and beliefs. And yes, those are my top five strengths. They do seem somewhat repetitive, no?) and given previous experience with Seligmen et al's research on character strengths, not entirely convinced by them. I mean, yes, I love thinking--but it's not all I do, not even at work, and I got much more balanced results from less commercially-oriented researchers.
Incidentally, the tests developed by the positive psychology researchers, who are also looking at character strengths and how to focus on them, are available for free on the internet--you don't need to buy the book to take the test. Just an fyi. It's a brilliant marketing strategy but that doesn't make it sound science.
January 1, 2010
"If you ever have the opportunity to read this book and take the StrengthsFinder quiz, I HIGHLY recommend that you do so. I read this book as part of a leadership development program that I am in for work. I learned more about myself from this book and the quiz results than I have in the first twelve months of the program. I learned why I have issues with losing my train of thought when speaking, why I feel this incessant need to constantly achieve and learn something, why I value my alone time.[return][return]More importantly, I learned that these are strengths rather than shortcomings. Of even greater importance, I was given helpful hints how to make these strengths work for me on the job and in my personal life. This blog is an excellent example of something that is using my strength of the need to reflect and think about things thoroughly. The fact that I read so many books of almost every genre is due to my passion for learning, which I can channel into my now-complete MBA studies and my CMA studying. I also discovered that my ideal job is ideal because it perfectly suits each one of my top five strengths.[return][return]What was of interest to me was that each one of the other twenty-three members of my leadership group had just as profound experiences as I did. When it happens to all of us, when we all feel empowered by the information learned about ourselves, you know that this is a life-altering book.[return][return]I am so thankful that I took the time to read this book for my program. It was recommended but not required, but I feel I got more out of the quiz results and the list of my top five strengths because I read the book. (Of course, it is a book, and I'm not someone to turn down reading one.) I cannot stress enough how much my perception on who I am has changed as a result of reading this and getting my top five themes. It was worth every minute of reading."
December 30, 2017
This is a cynical bullshit book. The Gallup Organization conducted a survey of over two million people to discover the source of their strengths. They provide a login for an online survey to "discover" your strengths. No book, no survey, so they keep selling books to people who want to find out their talents, and don't we all. Of course, everyone that takes the test further "strengthens the validity of the database." Reading through the list of strengths it was very obvious to me what mine were, without even taking the test. After the test they give your five top "themes," which I found ridiculous, since I strongly identified with two or three times that number.
The themes were of several different types, and there was no logical, unifying consistency to them. They had identified buckets into which people appeared to plop, and these became convenient descriptors,like Harmony, Futuristic, Restorative, Fairness, or Positivity.
The appeal is similar to a How Good Are You in Bed quiz in Cosmopolitan magazine, and about as profound.
The only worthwhile insight is the simple but important idea that companies and organizations should build on the strengths of individuals, not try to correct or treat their weaknesses, which will never become strengths. I heartily agree, but didn't need Buckingham to tell me that.
Buckingham worked for Gallup then, but quickly launched a successful career as a guru on the basis of this crap. The newer Strengths Finder 2.0 apparently builds on it and may be better, but I will not bother to find out.
The themes were of several different types, and there was no logical, unifying consistency to them. They had identified buckets into which people appeared to plop, and these became convenient descriptors,like Harmony, Futuristic, Restorative, Fairness, or Positivity.
The appeal is similar to a How Good Are You in Bed quiz in Cosmopolitan magazine, and about as profound.
The only worthwhile insight is the simple but important idea that companies and organizations should build on the strengths of individuals, not try to correct or treat their weaknesses, which will never become strengths. I heartily agree, but didn't need Buckingham to tell me that.
Buckingham worked for Gallup then, but quickly launched a successful career as a guru on the basis of this crap. The newer Strengths Finder 2.0 apparently builds on it and may be better, but I will not bother to find out.
November 1, 2020
از متن:
به گفته سليگمن رئيس پیشین انجمن روانشناسی آمريكا ما آنچنان غرق در توجه به كاستیها و بيماریها شدهايم كه توجه به توانمندیها،
نيمهای كه زندگی كردن را ارزشمند میسازد فراموش كـردهايم و آن را بدون پشتيبانی رها
ساختهايم.
به گفته سليگمن رئيس پیشین انجمن روانشناسی آمريكا ما آنچنان غرق در توجه به كاستیها و بيماریها شدهايم كه توجه به توانمندیها،
نيمهای كه زندگی كردن را ارزشمند میسازد فراموش كـردهايم و آن را بدون پشتيبانی رها
ساختهايم.
July 27, 2010
Like many business books, Now, Discover Your Strengths is a book about discovering who you are, what you're naturally best at and how best to apply it in a business or life sense. Interestingly, this book approaches skill and education as secondary to natural gifts, tendencies and talents. The book uses an online personality test called StrengthsFinder (also utilized in other business books) to determine your 5 strongest "themes" of character such as Harmony, Empathy, Activator or Development. The book uses these by way of Dungeons and Dragons-type perks or skills that make each person unique and gifted in combination with other "themes" and skill sets.
Unfortunately, I can't give this book a full score, since these books assume you have purchased the material. Having done this gives you access to the StrengthsFinder online test, but if a reader borrows or rents this book he/she is left merely guessing. Until I find some way to access StrengthsFinder this book is less than half as beneficial as it would like to be.
Unfortunately, I can't give this book a full score, since these books assume you have purchased the material. Having done this gives you access to the StrengthsFinder online test, but if a reader borrows or rents this book he/she is left merely guessing. Until I find some way to access StrengthsFinder this book is less than half as beneficial as it would like to be.
February 13, 2018
Embora eu acredite muito mais em neuroplasticidade do que o livro apregoa e limita, eu tenho que reconhecer o valor da teoria dos Pontos Fortes e que devemos focar neles. O teste oferecido com o livro é muito bacana e achei que o resultado é muito satisfatório. O Guia Prático no final do livro também tem pontos muito bons para serem implementados em uma organização.
O que mais faz sentido para mim é que temos que nos tornar nota 9 ou 10 onde já somos muito bons e melhorar nos pontos fracos apenas até que eles não sejam limitantes para nós, Exemplo: não sou Analítico mas aprendi a me virar bem nesse campo pois ele é importante para minha função.
Recomendo!
O que mais faz sentido para mim é que temos que nos tornar nota 9 ou 10 onde já somos muito bons e melhorar nos pontos fracos apenas até que eles não sejam limitantes para nós, Exemplo: não sou Analítico mas aprendi a me virar bem nesse campo pois ele é importante para minha função.
Recomendo!
August 22, 2025
این کتاب با جملهی ۳۴ نوع هوش داریم، هیچکسی نیست که در همهی این هوشها فوقالعاده باشه و هیچکسی هم نیست که از این ۳۴ هوش در پنجتاش فوقالعاده نباشه؛ شناخته شد. به نظرم همین چند جمله با کل محتوای کتاب برابری میکنه.
تو بخش اول کتاب نویسنده تاکید زیادی داره که برید دنبال استعدادتون. آدمها وقتی میرن دنبال استعداد و نقاط قوتشون موفق و خوشبخت میشن. (در صورتی که خیلیها با این مسئله کاملا مخالف هستن. افراد زیادی بودن که با استمرار و پشتکار تونستن در چیزی که استعداد نداشتن ولی بهش علاقه داشتن موفق بشن.)
در بخش دوم به معرفی ۳۴ نوع هوش میپردازه، هر کدوم رو تعریف میکنه و براشون مثال میزنه. در ادامه هم تست گالوپ رو که برای تشخیص ۵ هوش برتر هست رو معرفی میکنه.
در بخش سوم هم به سوالهای احتمالی که ممکنه برای خواننده پیش بیاد جواب میده.
به نظرم این کتاب چندان ارزش وقت گذاشتن نداره و اگه کسی خواست اینو بخونه به همون چندتا جملهای که کتاب باهاش شناخته شده بسنده کنه.
برای تست گالوپ هم من ترجمهی فارسی خوبی پیدا نکردم یا تفسیر خوبی پیدا نکردم، ولی از بین سایتهایی که تست رو داشتن به نظرم سایت روان هاب از همه بهتر بود.
من دو تا ترجمهی کتاب رو همزمان خوندم، یکی ترجمهی مهدی غروی از نشر معیار اندیشه و اون یکی هم ترجمهی بهاره پژومند از نشر شمشاد. پیشنهادم بین این دوتا ترجمهی نشر شمشاد هست که نسبت به اون یکی کاملتر هست.
تو بخش اول کتاب نویسنده تاکید زیادی داره که برید دنبال استعدادتون. آدمها وقتی میرن دنبال استعداد و نقاط قوتشون موفق و خوشبخت میشن. (در صورتی که خیلیها با این مسئله کاملا مخالف هستن. افراد زیادی بودن که با استمرار و پشتکار تونستن در چیزی که استعداد نداشتن ولی بهش علاقه داشتن موفق بشن.)
در بخش دوم به معرفی ۳۴ نوع هوش میپردازه، هر کدوم رو تعریف میکنه و براشون مثال میزنه. در ادامه هم تست گالوپ رو که برای تشخیص ۵ هوش برتر هست رو معرفی میکنه.
در بخش سوم هم به سوالهای احتمالی که ممکنه برای خواننده پیش بیاد جواب میده.
به نظرم این کتاب چندان ارزش وقت گذاشتن نداره و اگه کسی خواست اینو بخونه به همون چندتا جملهای که کتاب باهاش شناخته شده بسنده کنه.
برای تست گالوپ هم من ترجمهی فارسی خوبی پیدا نکردم یا تفسیر خوبی پیدا نکردم، ولی از بین سایتهایی که تست رو داشتن به نظرم سایت روان هاب از همه بهتر بود.
من دو تا ترجمهی کتاب رو همزمان خوندم، یکی ترجمهی مهدی غروی از نشر معیار اندیشه و اون یکی هم ترجمهی بهاره پژومند از نشر شمشاد. پیشنهادم بین این دوتا ترجمهی نشر شمشاد هست که نسبت به اون یکی کاملتر هست.
January 1, 2009
My strengths, which at first, 1-2 didn't make sense to me, but gradually I saw how they rule my life in every way. My entire family did this b-c my sister gave us all the books and it made for great holiday discussions and greater understanding and appreciation for our unique strengths. I also bought the books for all my co-workers and we had a discussion date to understand what each of us brings to our workplace and how we could better position ourselves to utilize our strengths. Every person in life would benefit from this. NOTE: you have to buy this new to get the one-time code in the book to take your strengths test online after chapter 3, the rest of the book is referencing your results.
August 5, 2007
My supervisor mentioned this book to me so I started reading it. It also includes a website that you visit to take a strengths finder test which is suppose to help you excel at your job (and for this reason, you should buy the book new so you have the code to use). The idea is rather than focusing on trying to improve your weaknesses, you focus on improving your strengths, resulting in a near perfect performance anytime. I would recommend this book to anyone that wants to learn more about their inner workings.
November 21, 2010
This book should have a disclaimer on it stating you have to buy the book for full price new, or else it's useless. The whole premise of the book is analyzing your results from their "Strengthsfinder" test, but you don't find this out til halfway through the book. It takes even longer for you to find out that you are supposed to use the code from inside the dustjacket. If you get this from the used bookstore, the library, or even brand new and someone else has stolen the code, you've absolutely wasted your time. The author provides no way on his website of even paying for a new activation code, either. Absolutely aggravating and completely makes the book worthless.
May 23, 2010
Incredible information contained within, quite a paradigm shift and an invaluable contribution to my personal self awareness as well as plans and choices about future life path.
August 2, 2019
(The English review is placed beneath Russian one)
Сразу скажу, что я рассматриваю только теоретическую часть книги, т.е. сам тест я оставляю за скобками.
Авторы в центр своей книги (или теории) ставят фокусирование на сильных сторонах человека и именно на те, что человек часто и с успехом использует (авторы подчёркивают это, как важный фактор). Также они пишут, как я это понял, что сильные стороны имеют в качестве основных ингредиентов следующие материалы: знания, навыки и талан. Последнему они посвятят большую часть своей теории. Всё это мы находим в первой части книги. Вторая часть книги - довольно странная, т.к. авторы начинают сначала с описания того, как мозг или точнее нейроны формируют наши навыки: чем чаще мы тренируем определённый навык, тем чётче нейроновый путь и тем виртуозней мы владеем навыком. Далее авторы посветят много времени, фактически, пересказу предыдущей их книги, которая и сделала авторов знаменитыми. Т.е. в середине рассматриваемой книги авторы большую её часть посвятят пересказу своей теории, которая была подробно описана в книге «Сначала нарушьте все правила. Что лучшие в мире менеджеры делают по-другому». Суть теории одной фразой: укрепляйте свои сильные стороны, свои сильные способности, т.е. то, что вы делаете лучше всего и не тратьте время на ваши слабые стороны (если вы никак не можете научиться писать без орфографических ошибок, не мучьте себя зубрёжкой правил, а просто пользуйтесь программой Microsoft Word, а освободившиеся время потратьте на укрепление своих сильных сторон, на их тренировку). Мысль очень верная, так же как и книга, которая полностью этой теме и посвящена.
И третий момент, это соединение темы работы нейронов по обучению навыкам и темы «главное – наши сильные стороны». Т.е. авторы попробовали присоединить к своей теории, тему по нейропсихологии, которую упоминают чуть ли не в каждой третьей книге по психологии. В итоге, авторы как-то не убедительно показали это. И если честно, я не совсем понял, что они хотели сказать этим объединением двух теорий - уж слишком быстро они прошлись, без более чёткого объяснения своей идеи.
После того как мы определили всё это, авторы уходят в неструктурированный текст, с одной сплошной водой и пустословием. Это я говорю уже о последней части книги. Сплошные пустые слова и очевидные вещи, которые можно использовать практически в любой книге по самопомощи (и которые используются).
I will say right away that I consider only the theoretical part of the book, i.e. I do not consider the test itself.
In the center of the book the authors put the strengths of the person, those that the person often and successfully uses (the authors emphasize this as an important factor). They also write, as I understand it, that the main ingredients of the strengths are knowledge, skills and talent. They will devote most of their theory to talent. All this is found in the first part of the book. The second part of the book is quite strange, because the authors start from the beginning with a description of how the brain or neurons shape our skills: the more often we train a certain skill, the clearer the neuronal path and the more virtuoso we have the skill. Then the authors will spend a lot of time, in fact, retelling their previous book, which made the authors famous. That is, in the middle of this book, the authors will devote most of it to retelling their own theory, which was described in detail in the book "First, Break All the Rules: What the World's Greatest Managers Do Differently". The essence of the theory in one phrase: reinforce your strengths, your strong abilities, i.e., what you do best and do not waste time on your weaknesses (if you cannot learn to write without spelling mistakes, do not torture yourself by bothering to learn the rules, and just use Microsoft Word). The idea is very true, as well as the book, which is completely devoted to this topic.
And the third point is the combination of the theme "neuronal work during learning" and the theme "the main thing is our strengths". That is, the authors have tried to add to their theory the topic of neuropsychology, which is mentioned in almost every third book on psychology. As a result, the authors somehow failed to show it convincingly. And to be honest, I did not quite understand what they wanted to say with this combination of the two theories - they went too quickly, without a clearer explanation of their idea.
After we have defined all this, the authors go into an unstructured text and empty words. I'm talking about the last part of the book. All the empty words and obvious things that can be used in almost any self-help book (and that are used).
Сразу скажу, что я рассматриваю только теоретическую часть книги, т.е. сам тест я оставляю за скобками.
Авторы в центр своей книги (или теории) ставят фокусирование на сильных сторонах человека и именно на те, что человек часто и с успехом использует (авторы подчёркивают это, как важный фактор). Также они пишут, как я это понял, что сильные стороны имеют в качестве основных ингредиентов следующие материалы: знания, навыки и талан. Последнему они посвятят большую часть своей теории. Всё это мы находим в первой части книги. Вторая часть книги - довольно странная, т.к. авторы начинают сначала с описания того, как мозг или точнее нейроны формируют наши навыки: чем чаще мы тренируем определённый навык, тем чётче нейроновый путь и тем виртуозней мы владеем навыком. Далее авторы посветят много времени, фактически, пересказу предыдущей их книги, которая и сделала авторов знаменитыми. Т.е. в середине рассматриваемой книги авторы большую её часть посвятят пересказу своей теории, которая была подробно описана в книге «Сначала нарушьте все правила. Что лучшие в мире менеджеры делают по-другому». Суть теории одной фразой: укрепляйте свои сильные стороны, свои сильные способности, т.е. то, что вы делаете лучше всего и не тратьте время на ваши слабые стороны (если вы никак не можете научиться писать без орфографических ошибок, не мучьте себя зубрёжкой правил, а просто пользуйтесь программой Microsoft Word, а освободившиеся время потратьте на укрепление своих сильных сторон, на их тренировку). Мысль очень верная, так же как и книга, которая полностью этой теме и посвящена.
И третий момент, это соединение темы работы нейронов по обучению навыкам и темы «главное – наши сильные стороны». Т.е. авторы попробовали присоединить к своей теории, тему по нейропсихологии, которую упоминают чуть ли не в каждой третьей книге по психологии. В итоге, авторы как-то не убедительно показали это. И если честно, я не совсем понял, что они хотели сказать этим объединением двух теорий - уж слишком быстро они прошлись, без более чёткого объяснения своей идеи.
После того как мы определили всё это, авторы уходят в неструктурированный текст, с одной сплошной водой и пустословием. Это я говорю уже о последней части книги. Сплошные пустые слова и очевидные вещи, которые можно использовать практически в любой книге по самопомощи (и которые используются).
I will say right away that I consider only the theoretical part of the book, i.e. I do not consider the test itself.
In the center of the book the authors put the strengths of the person, those that the person often and successfully uses (the authors emphasize this as an important factor). They also write, as I understand it, that the main ingredients of the strengths are knowledge, skills and talent. They will devote most of their theory to talent. All this is found in the first part of the book. The second part of the book is quite strange, because the authors start from the beginning with a description of how the brain or neurons shape our skills: the more often we train a certain skill, the clearer the neuronal path and the more virtuoso we have the skill. Then the authors will spend a lot of time, in fact, retelling their previous book, which made the authors famous. That is, in the middle of this book, the authors will devote most of it to retelling their own theory, which was described in detail in the book "First, Break All the Rules: What the World's Greatest Managers Do Differently". The essence of the theory in one phrase: reinforce your strengths, your strong abilities, i.e., what you do best and do not waste time on your weaknesses (if you cannot learn to write without spelling mistakes, do not torture yourself by bothering to learn the rules, and just use Microsoft Word). The idea is very true, as well as the book, which is completely devoted to this topic.
And the third point is the combination of the theme "neuronal work during learning" and the theme "the main thing is our strengths". That is, the authors have tried to add to their theory the topic of neuropsychology, which is mentioned in almost every third book on psychology. As a result, the authors somehow failed to show it convincingly. And to be honest, I did not quite understand what they wanted to say with this combination of the two theories - they went too quickly, without a clearer explanation of their idea.
After we have defined all this, the authors go into an unstructured text and empty words. I'm talking about the last part of the book. All the empty words and obvious things that can be used in almost any self-help book (and that are used).
March 26, 2012
How many of us, well into our careers, still live with the mistaken idea that the purpose of most of our activities is to work on those weaknesses and somehow turn them into strengths? I would venture to say, the majority of us, certainly those of us who grew up with post war parents who themselves believed that success in working life and achievement can be measured by the extent to which his has been accomplished.
In the meantime, strengths, natural aptitudes, and in most cases the activities that enhance our well being are almost ignored, simply because so much energy goes into working on those weaknesses.
When put this simply, none of us should be surprised at the level of unhappiness sustained by a lot of people in their jobs.
So, in the face of this general discontent, Marcus Buckingham comes along to shake us up and wake us up. With the help of his, dare I say it, easy to understand theory, we can turn our professional and personal lives around.
What you need to do, is rediscover the strengths that are an integral part of your own personality, and by strengths he means, not only the things you excel at but that also give a sense of satisfaction and contentment. Then to increase well being it is essential to take these discoveries seriously and ensure they can be put to use to either help you choose a new career path or to improve your situation in your current job.
Bosses, he says, must be aware of the natural strengths of employees and work on finding ways of utilising these instead of regularly planning training programmes to help them identify weaknesses that subsequently should be worked on to transform them into strengths because that just isn’t about to happen. It takes much more energy and investment to work on weaknesses than it does to enhance strengths.
Simple, yet it took Marcus Buckingham to point it out. A definite eye opener.
In the meantime, strengths, natural aptitudes, and in most cases the activities that enhance our well being are almost ignored, simply because so much energy goes into working on those weaknesses.
When put this simply, none of us should be surprised at the level of unhappiness sustained by a lot of people in their jobs.
So, in the face of this general discontent, Marcus Buckingham comes along to shake us up and wake us up. With the help of his, dare I say it, easy to understand theory, we can turn our professional and personal lives around.
What you need to do, is rediscover the strengths that are an integral part of your own personality, and by strengths he means, not only the things you excel at but that also give a sense of satisfaction and contentment. Then to increase well being it is essential to take these discoveries seriously and ensure they can be put to use to either help you choose a new career path or to improve your situation in your current job.
Bosses, he says, must be aware of the natural strengths of employees and work on finding ways of utilising these instead of regularly planning training programmes to help them identify weaknesses that subsequently should be worked on to transform them into strengths because that just isn’t about to happen. It takes much more energy and investment to work on weaknesses than it does to enhance strengths.
Simple, yet it took Marcus Buckingham to point it out. A definite eye opener.
September 19, 2010
I read this book and took the test as part of a career-discernment period, and found the concepts it offered to be very helpful.
American corporations and individuals tend to focus on weakness. What am I (or my employees) bad at, and how can I fix it? This book suggests that while we can spend a lot of time trying to fix our weaknesses, we'll never be nearly as successful at that as we will be at improving on our strengths. We're wired to be good at certain things. If we focus on them, we can get very, very good at them.
I really liked this approach because A) it makes more sense than banging your head against a wall repeatedly (aka trying to fix your weaknesses, which you will probably never be great at) and B) it takes into account the fact that I AM NOT SUPERWOMAN! (No offense to Alicia Keys.) I don't have to be the perfect person, because I am part of a community of people, and if we all focus on what we do best, we can work together far more effectively than everyone trying to be independent, "well-rounded," self-contained, perfect little people.
So-- maybe we can't be perfect. But we can do some things well. Really well. And then we can work together, to cover one another's weaknesses and capitalize on each other's strengths. Seems like a pretty good idea to me.
American corporations and individuals tend to focus on weakness. What am I (or my employees) bad at, and how can I fix it? This book suggests that while we can spend a lot of time trying to fix our weaknesses, we'll never be nearly as successful at that as we will be at improving on our strengths. We're wired to be good at certain things. If we focus on them, we can get very, very good at them.
I really liked this approach because A) it makes more sense than banging your head against a wall repeatedly (aka trying to fix your weaknesses, which you will probably never be great at) and B) it takes into account the fact that I AM NOT SUPERWOMAN! (No offense to Alicia Keys.) I don't have to be the perfect person, because I am part of a community of people, and if we all focus on what we do best, we can work together far more effectively than everyone trying to be independent, "well-rounded," self-contained, perfect little people.
So-- maybe we can't be perfect. But we can do some things well. Really well. And then we can work together, to cover one another's weaknesses and capitalize on each other's strengths. Seems like a pretty good idea to me.
October 5, 2012
I got through this quickly since it was an abridged audio version. I may go back & read the full version on my Kindle. I have been researching strengths based movement and approach to leadership recently.
There was a lot of good insight here, but the big takeaway for me was the author's comment about incremental improvements. Once you discover your strengths, you can hone them by incremental improvements. It reminds me of Mack Anderson's book, 212 Degrees.
The difference between world class excellence and average is often very small.
In the same way, you don't need to kill yourself trying to improve your weaknesses. Just make small incremental changes to improve those areas to defend against failures.
I'm putting this into practice at work now, and am already seeing measurable changes. The best change is in my own positive outlook. After hammering myself on my weaknesses all my life, this is a very liberating and exciting change.
There was a lot of good insight here, but the big takeaway for me was the author's comment about incremental improvements. Once you discover your strengths, you can hone them by incremental improvements. It reminds me of Mack Anderson's book, 212 Degrees.
The difference between world class excellence and average is often very small.
In the same way, you don't need to kill yourself trying to improve your weaknesses. Just make small incremental changes to improve those areas to defend against failures.
I'm putting this into practice at work now, and am already seeing measurable changes. The best change is in my own positive outlook. After hammering myself on my weaknesses all my life, this is a very liberating and exciting change.
May 1, 2022
Now, Discover Your Strengths’ rate of determined five stars is a representation of my resolute recommendation for the book. A must read for everyone - reader or non-reader. Each of us aims to live a life filled with content and meaning but how can you achieve that meaning if you have not the slightest idea of your innate talents? Today's generation is always unsatisfied, how about looking inside you? How about knowing your strengths?
The strengths of the book are its captivating writing approach that will make you evaluate yourself every time the attributes of a talent is being deeply explained, the brilliant research from Gallup constructing a magnificent and credible cover for the representation of the thirty-four talents or themes as the book calls them, and lastly but the most special is its superb applications for our careers, relationships, and every aspects of our life. If you play by your strengths, you will harmonize.
The strengths of the book are its captivating writing approach that will make you evaluate yourself every time the attributes of a talent is being deeply explained, the brilliant research from Gallup constructing a magnificent and credible cover for the representation of the thirty-four talents or themes as the book calls them, and lastly but the most special is its superb applications for our careers, relationships, and every aspects of our life. If you play by your strengths, you will harmonize.
September 29, 2018
Uma vez ao entrevistar um candidato ele perguntou que tipo de líder eu era! Alguém que maximizaria seus pontos fortes ou ficaria minha energia em desenvolver, melhorar seus pontos fracos. O livro reforça a importância e os resultados positivos que obtemos quando conseguimos administrar nossos pontos fracos não deixando os mesmos nos prejudicar, e ficar assim toda a energia em maximizar e extrair ainda mais de nossos pontos fortes. O resultado do exercício - descubra seus 5 pontos mais fortes - pode lhe trazer algumas surpresas mas no geral trará uma representativa exata de suas habilidade mais fortes. Muito bom também para trabalho em equipe
December 15, 2022
I was lucky enough to be working at Gallup when the company was doing the research that underpins this book, and I have met both the authors. I highly recommend following a strengths-based approach in thinking about how you contribute your talents at work, in your volunteering, and how you live your life. While the instrument that measures strengths that appears in this book is good, Gallup has since updated it, and I highly recommend that version over this one. You can learn more about Gallup's strengths-based approach at https://www.gallup.com/cliftonstrengt....
January 31, 2023
کشف توانمندیها کتابی جالبیه و خوندنش میتونه برای هر کسی که بین تواناییها و ضعفهاش سردرگمه کمک بسیاری کنه.
بخش دوم کتاب بیشتر مثل لغتنامه است و باید وقتی که یه جایی گیر میکنی و نمیدونی با یه آدمی که توانایی های خاصی داره چطوری باید برخورد کنی یا وقتی که تو یه کار نمیدونی چطوری از توانمندیهات استفاده کنی بهش رجوع کنی...
بخش دوم کتاب بیشتر مثل لغتنامه است و باید وقتی که یه جایی گیر میکنی و نمیدونی با یه آدمی که توانایی های خاصی داره چطوری باید برخورد کنی یا وقتی که تو یه کار نمیدونی چطوری از توانمندیهات استفاده کنی بهش رجوع کنی...
January 7, 2025
A staple , plus a quiz , a must have in your business library for reference
December 31, 2023
Overall this book is unremarkable in it's approach to self awareness, and the claim of the program being revolutionary is fallable considering many other works focus on similar methods. There are 34 themes that the authors have opted to include in this psychoanalysis of how people approach life, and a specific focus is directed toward a professional environment. The gist is that an individual can test and find which 5 of these areas are their "most likely match" and thus their current strengths. The issue is that there is no quantitative approach to the test to show how close the others are to being top focal points, and conversely there is no discussion surrounding how to manage the other 29 areas to ensure they don't remain lackluster as opposed to bridging a gap between the reader and others they will ineveitably interact with through life. The work was asssigned as part of a leadership development program, though the main benefit was that each of us was reading it and had the ability to use common vernacular to connect ideals together as a team, and also to work with others that had different strengths to round off our team projects, but the book does not focus on an organizational approach to these concepts and thus is lacking in its effedctiveness. I recently read the book again to validate my initial feelings and honestly not much has changed. It's nice to have a frame of reference, but there are better titles in the market for self-development/awareness and measuring our strengths versus opportunities for growth rather than focusing on a few categories to the exclusion of the rest.
March 15, 2021
Fascinating read. On how brain begins with numerous neurons and synapses but loses majority of them as we age. Only those associate the most to the ‘talents’ are retained. On why we rely on our most familiar traits to make most of day-to-day decisions although we are trained to use more suitable methods. That we should capitalize on these remaining neurons and synapses and manage our weaknesses by surrounding ourselves with people whose talents make up for our weaknesses. On how people get ‘over promoted’ which is getting removed from what they do best and be tasked with assignments that don’t play to their strengths. On how employees got promoted based on ‘Responsibility’ and ‘Harmony’ despite these do not help with customer loyalty as much as ‘Activator’, ‘Command’, ‘Empathy’, ‘Learner’. On how people filter the world differently depending on their talents and why good managers should develop ‘Individuality’ to work with different profiles. Favorite lessons: If you want something done give it to the busy people as they are the ‘Achievers’. Assign new tasks after the completion of the previous to keep ‘Achievers’ stimulated. They also bond more when asked "How late did you work last night to get it done?" than any other kinds of question, it shows you recognize their effort and care. Talk about the “new goals”, not changes in the goals to the ‘Focus’. It is how they are tuned in.
In a massive, long-term study of 17,000 British civil servants, an almost unbelievable conclusion emerged: the status of a person’s job was more able to predict their likelihood of a heart attack than obesity, smoking or high blood pressure.. exactly the same result emerged from a similar study of a million employees of the Bell Telephone Company in the 1960’s.
In a massive, long-term study of 17,000 British civil servants, an almost unbelievable conclusion emerged: the status of a person’s job was more able to predict their likelihood of a heart attack than obesity, smoking or high blood pressure.. exactly the same result emerged from a similar study of a million employees of the Bell Telephone Company in the 1960’s.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
January 9, 2019
The nice part of this book is detailed explanation of what is talent/strength based on how our brain develop. As the brain can't do everything well, based on genes and magic they build certain pathways that are optimised for excellence in certain areas.
What it also gives is a methodology how Gallup many years ago developed a tool to indicate personal strength areas. Which you rarely get and what is generally interesting to learn about. In this case they indicate 34 themes of strengths and give plenty of descriptions of how they look like at the workplace and how they can be encouraged.
The last part is more for managers who work with teams and look for ways to build a system where everyone's strengths are realised. The general idea is the same old good one - productivity or growth means different things for different individuals. As the trends recommend, "personalise"
What it also gives is a methodology how Gallup many years ago developed a tool to indicate personal strength areas. Which you rarely get and what is generally interesting to learn about. In this case they indicate 34 themes of strengths and give plenty of descriptions of how they look like at the workplace and how they can be encouraged.
The last part is more for managers who work with teams and look for ways to build a system where everyone's strengths are realised. The general idea is the same old good one - productivity or growth means different things for different individuals. As the trends recommend, "personalise"
July 19, 2021
Fantastic follow-up to "First, Break All the Rules." Quicker, too, because I'd already taken the StrengthsFinder test and read about the strengths, which constitute a bulk of the book's content. Definitely a fantastic resource and worth revisiting; I would love to see capitalizing on our strengths (rather than weaknesses) a lot more in society today.
March 1, 2019
Muito prático e objetivo. Acredito que é uma boa fonte para evolução e ele foca principalmente nos 5 maiores pontos fortes individuais. Faz-se um teste na internet, através de um código que vem em cada livro em que são analisadas tomadas de decisão rápidas e o que mais encaixa individualmente.
Pro estudo existem 34 habilidades e que quando você fica consciente sobre seus maiores pontos fortes, para de focar nos “gaps” e fraquezas e sim cada vez melhorar estes pontos fortes. Cita muitos exemplos de caso de sucesso e como aplicar dentro da empresa. Livro para se consultar sempre, vale muito como um estudo.
Pro estudo existem 34 habilidades e que quando você fica consciente sobre seus maiores pontos fortes, para de focar nos “gaps” e fraquezas e sim cada vez melhorar estes pontos fortes. Cita muitos exemplos de caso de sucesso e como aplicar dentro da empresa. Livro para se consultar sempre, vale muito como um estudo.
December 30, 2023
In 2006, when I started my first “real” job, I was handed Now, Discover Your Strengths by my boss and told to take the quiz. The company was using the Strengthsfinder to better understand the best way for people managers managers to approach coaching, mentoring, and managing their direct reports, help all employees understand how to leverage their own strengths in approaching their work, and help everyone learn how to better interact with their coworkers. As someone who has about zero understanding of social interaction on any level, I thought this sounded like a fantastic way to help understand people and was excited to be handed a key to socializing, at least on a professional level. As a fresh-faced 23-year-old recent college graduate, I was naïve enough to believe that this is how it would work and had no idea that HR departments around the world often roll out this sort of “requirement”, without any actual ties to, or understanding of, what the various employees do every day. Alas, I read the book cover to cover, and took the quiz.
My results at that time gave the following 5 Strengths:
1. Analytical – (biggest strength) I like to challenge others to provide evidence until their arguments stand strong or fall apart. I see myself as objective and dispassionate, without an agenda (flipside: I also assumes the same of others). Others see me as logical. This may also be why I see that each of these “strengths” are natural character traits which I can leverage to excel in everyday tasks, or which can also cause weaknesses.
2. Deliberate – I act carefully, vigilantly, and privately. I understand the world is unpredictable, and I draw risks in to the open for assessment and understanding. I like to plan ahead to avoid these risks. I am extremely cautious and selective in forming new friends, and don’t give out praise often – when I do, it is significant (flipside: I may seem cold and bitchy). I actually like the description in the book that says “You identify the dangers, weight their relative impact and then place your feet deliberately. You walk with care.”
3. Strategic – This is not a strength that can be learned. I have an inborn ability to cut through chaos and find the best route. Where others see complexity, I see patterns. My brain immediately plays out multiple scenarios when faced with a challenge, to allow me to see the best outcome, asking “what if?” and selecting or striking the outcome to choose the best path. A lot of the time, all of this happens instantaneously, but I need to have a strong foundational knowledge of the subject matter and it's vocabulary and procedures.
4. Learner – I love to learn and always find a lesson in every action. This is probably why I read this book, took the quiz, and evaluated all of my strengths and how to use them. It helps me thrive in short term projects (and causes me to volunteer for them in the first place). The learning experience is more important to me than the outcome, and I’m happy to jump from one subject to another as opportunities arise. Collecting facts excites me almost as much as sharing them with others (yay trivia!). The downside of this is I often take on way too much all a once, without caring if a promotion, raise, or any other benefit will result because new facts = dopamine.
5. Relator – This doesn’t mean I make friends easily, but I am able to find a way to relate to others, and when I decide the risk of forming a relationship is worth it, I go all in. I have few friends, but the ones I have are very deep, strong friendships.
These strengths scream litigator to me, which is funny because I prefer transactional, specifically contractual, work. I ended up going to law school just a few years after taking the quiz, although it was not because of this quiz – I was already well aware of my natural love for logic, reason, and deliberation, in addition to reading and writing. Now, almost 20 years later, the Analytical trait won’t stop thinking about these “strengths” again, and whether I ever learned how to use them properly to my advantage. Or, if I allowed my natural dominant traits to lead me toward a life of little human interaction, work-aholism, and allowing others (my employer, specifically) to take advantage of my hard work and love of learning and taking on new projects without offering me benefits (pay raise or promotion) because I’m having fun doing it. And believe me, I am legitimately having fun with my work – I love my job and my team. But I keep asking: shouldn’t I be making more money? (And, yes, others ask me this too.)
So I went back to this book. What are my strengths now? Don Clifton, the “Father of Strengths Psychology” and inventor of what is now called CliftonStrenths (formerly Strengthsfinder), says your strengths don’t change. Who you are is who you are. So, I’m curious. After nearly two decades, will my results be the same? I just re-read the book, and feel like the above still describe who I am, but let’s see.
My 2023 Results look almost nothing like my 2006 results. I guess the idea that they don’t change is faulty.
1. Strategic - You notice new as well as unusual configurations in facts, evidence, or data. Others, however, can see only separate, unrelated bits of information. You are fascinated by problems that puzzle, confound, or frustrate most people. By nature, you might easily detect unusual configurations or spot new trends in data or factual information. Devising options appeals to you. You have little interest in simply repeating what worked in the past. – now my #1 strength, makes sense since this is the only one that is an inborn trait, rather than something that can be developed. (Isn’t the fact that he points out this one can’t be learned imply the others CAN be learned, thereby contradicting his opinion that strengths don’t change?). This really is me to a T though: “You generate ideas quickly… draw clever linkages between facts, events, people, problems, or solutions. You present others with numerous options at a pace some find dizzying… You welcome the abundance of information… You notice new as well as unusual configurations in facts, evidence, or data. Others, however, can see only separate, unrelated bits of information. You are fascinated by problems that puzzle, confound, or frustrate most people. By nature, you might easily detect unusual configurations or spot new trends in data or factual information. Devising options appeals to you. You have little interest in simply repeating what worked in the past.”
2. Learner – still a strength. I love a challenge, new knowledge excites me, and I have definitely been known to get lost in a book. “You ponder your decisions rather than react without thinking through things. You weigh the possible ramifications, consequences, outcomes, and effects. You aim to understand the basic ‘whys’ and ‘hows’ of a situation, problem, or opportunity.”
3. Intellection – new. This strength kind of combines strategic and learner – “By nature, you prepare for assignments by reading extensively. Your capacity for pulling together information from books, publications, correspondence, notes, or Internet sites serves you well…. You enjoy collecting new information and insights. Frequently you draw on what you read weeks, months or even years ago to outmaneuver [others].” Well, damn. You got me there.
4. Input – new. I’m sensing a theme here: “By nature, you probably are a well-read individual. Reading is one of your favorite pastimes. Undoubtedly, the information you gather benefits you as a person and as a professional.” Some of it is ridiculous (implying that I enjoy reading the dictionary to sound smarter? Do people do that? If you are reading this, and you do that, please stop. You are enough and people respect you.), other parts are again spot-on, but seem repetitive of the above (“you spend hours unraveling the mysteries of complicated procedures, routines, or systems”), and some really make you question if this trait is really a “strength” (“Chances are good that you rely on your passion for reading to help you launch conversations. Engaging in small talk or casual chitchat is likely to be difficult for you.”).
5. Maximizer – new. This theme is focused on seeking out strengths, either individually or as a team, and employing them to their best advantage, in order to create Excellence. I want to be the best, and seek perfection by finding ways to make my strengths the foundation of my work, and want to be appreciated for my strengths, and see no point in working on overcoming my weaknesses. Except, that’s not true at all. While I do focus on my strengths and how to best utilize and develop them in every situation, and choose projects that align with my strengths (obviously, I read this book and took the quiz twice), I do also keep note of my weaknesses and try to work on those as well. I’m best at jumping into new projects and love the work where I’m learning and exploring, but I’m not so great at finishing, and I’m actively working on learning how to end a project – when to hand off final tasks, how to conduct a post-mortem, and discussing lessons learned – before jumping into the next exciting thing. I’m also learning how to delegate – something I fail miserably at and actually contradicts all of my strengths because obviously I want to do the work myself, even when I overestimate my capacity to do so. And to top it off, I’m not only working on those two weaknesses, but I asked for help in doing so – another major weakness of mine. However, I don’t look at these weaknesses as any sort of failure or shortcoming, just things that can make me stronger. I don’t think that’s a bad thing or “minimizes” my work.
So, there ya have it. Very different list of strengths, despite the idea that they don’t change. But doesn’t this make sense? I first took the quiz as I was just starting my career – I was young, naïve of corporate politics, and thought I was invincible. The economy was booming and I was a cocky, super-smart, talented young thing who was going to conquer the world, despite having no practical experience in anything other than reading and writing, and a talent for arguing.
Now, nearly two decades later, my career has been sent in a million different directions due to two major recessions, a hard turn back to academics (law school) after the housing bust, and the impact of becoming aware of the realities of the world we live in. Just working hard and knowing stuff doesn’t matter. If you’re a non-Italian non-male wanting to work in the contracting world, “maybe you should try real estate.” (Um, sir, thanks for skirting the edge of what you can and can't say in an interview.) And once you find a job in a completely different industry that seems like a perfect fit – lots of work reading, writing, negotiating, and learning new information all the time! – you realize the idea of a “promotion if you work harder and take on more responsibility” is a smokescreen, because the only people getting promoted are friends with someone on the hiring committee, and there aren’t going to be any availabilities in your department, no matter how indispensable you become.
So, what are your options? You need to focus on your transferable skills and begin considering a transfer somewhere that might at least offer a path for promotion and more money. And what are those transferable skills? Well, let’s start with Strengths – the inherent traits I carry with me that I can utilize to my benefit and to my employer’s benefit.
It is kind of funny that this is what got me to this point, since my dominant trait is Strategic, and my primary Strength Domain (new since 2006) is Strategic Thinking – focused primarily on absorbing and analyzing data to make better decisions. The book says Strategic Thinkers should be put in charge of the whole organization because we see the big picture, cut through the bull, and make sound decisions based on factual information. Based on all of my strengths, both old (2006) and new (2023), my Strength Domain paired with (apparently) a talent for Maximizing the strengths of myself and those on my team, and my analysis of all of the above, I feel like I have had an important epiphany about my career:
Clearly someone should hire me ASAP as their CEO and get me one of those one-percenter salaries and a golden parachute, because damn, this girl’s tired AF.
My results at that time gave the following 5 Strengths:
1. Analytical – (biggest strength) I like to challenge others to provide evidence until their arguments stand strong or fall apart. I see myself as objective and dispassionate, without an agenda (flipside: I also assumes the same of others). Others see me as logical. This may also be why I see that each of these “strengths” are natural character traits which I can leverage to excel in everyday tasks, or which can also cause weaknesses.
2. Deliberate – I act carefully, vigilantly, and privately. I understand the world is unpredictable, and I draw risks in to the open for assessment and understanding. I like to plan ahead to avoid these risks. I am extremely cautious and selective in forming new friends, and don’t give out praise often – when I do, it is significant (flipside: I may seem cold and bitchy). I actually like the description in the book that says “You identify the dangers, weight their relative impact and then place your feet deliberately. You walk with care.”
3. Strategic – This is not a strength that can be learned. I have an inborn ability to cut through chaos and find the best route. Where others see complexity, I see patterns. My brain immediately plays out multiple scenarios when faced with a challenge, to allow me to see the best outcome, asking “what if?” and selecting or striking the outcome to choose the best path. A lot of the time, all of this happens instantaneously, but I need to have a strong foundational knowledge of the subject matter and it's vocabulary and procedures.
4. Learner – I love to learn and always find a lesson in every action. This is probably why I read this book, took the quiz, and evaluated all of my strengths and how to use them. It helps me thrive in short term projects (and causes me to volunteer for them in the first place). The learning experience is more important to me than the outcome, and I’m happy to jump from one subject to another as opportunities arise. Collecting facts excites me almost as much as sharing them with others (yay trivia!). The downside of this is I often take on way too much all a once, without caring if a promotion, raise, or any other benefit will result because new facts = dopamine.
5. Relator – This doesn’t mean I make friends easily, but I am able to find a way to relate to others, and when I decide the risk of forming a relationship is worth it, I go all in. I have few friends, but the ones I have are very deep, strong friendships.
These strengths scream litigator to me, which is funny because I prefer transactional, specifically contractual, work. I ended up going to law school just a few years after taking the quiz, although it was not because of this quiz – I was already well aware of my natural love for logic, reason, and deliberation, in addition to reading and writing. Now, almost 20 years later, the Analytical trait won’t stop thinking about these “strengths” again, and whether I ever learned how to use them properly to my advantage. Or, if I allowed my natural dominant traits to lead me toward a life of little human interaction, work-aholism, and allowing others (my employer, specifically) to take advantage of my hard work and love of learning and taking on new projects without offering me benefits (pay raise or promotion) because I’m having fun doing it. And believe me, I am legitimately having fun with my work – I love my job and my team. But I keep asking: shouldn’t I be making more money? (And, yes, others ask me this too.)
So I went back to this book. What are my strengths now? Don Clifton, the “Father of Strengths Psychology” and inventor of what is now called CliftonStrenths (formerly Strengthsfinder), says your strengths don’t change. Who you are is who you are. So, I’m curious. After nearly two decades, will my results be the same? I just re-read the book, and feel like the above still describe who I am, but let’s see.
My 2023 Results look almost nothing like my 2006 results. I guess the idea that they don’t change is faulty.
1. Strategic - You notice new as well as unusual configurations in facts, evidence, or data. Others, however, can see only separate, unrelated bits of information. You are fascinated by problems that puzzle, confound, or frustrate most people. By nature, you might easily detect unusual configurations or spot new trends in data or factual information. Devising options appeals to you. You have little interest in simply repeating what worked in the past. – now my #1 strength, makes sense since this is the only one that is an inborn trait, rather than something that can be developed. (Isn’t the fact that he points out this one can’t be learned imply the others CAN be learned, thereby contradicting his opinion that strengths don’t change?). This really is me to a T though: “You generate ideas quickly… draw clever linkages between facts, events, people, problems, or solutions. You present others with numerous options at a pace some find dizzying… You welcome the abundance of information… You notice new as well as unusual configurations in facts, evidence, or data. Others, however, can see only separate, unrelated bits of information. You are fascinated by problems that puzzle, confound, or frustrate most people. By nature, you might easily detect unusual configurations or spot new trends in data or factual information. Devising options appeals to you. You have little interest in simply repeating what worked in the past.”
2. Learner – still a strength. I love a challenge, new knowledge excites me, and I have definitely been known to get lost in a book. “You ponder your decisions rather than react without thinking through things. You weigh the possible ramifications, consequences, outcomes, and effects. You aim to understand the basic ‘whys’ and ‘hows’ of a situation, problem, or opportunity.”
3. Intellection – new. This strength kind of combines strategic and learner – “By nature, you prepare for assignments by reading extensively. Your capacity for pulling together information from books, publications, correspondence, notes, or Internet sites serves you well…. You enjoy collecting new information and insights. Frequently you draw on what you read weeks, months or even years ago to outmaneuver [others].” Well, damn. You got me there.
4. Input – new. I’m sensing a theme here: “By nature, you probably are a well-read individual. Reading is one of your favorite pastimes. Undoubtedly, the information you gather benefits you as a person and as a professional.” Some of it is ridiculous (implying that I enjoy reading the dictionary to sound smarter? Do people do that? If you are reading this, and you do that, please stop. You are enough and people respect you.), other parts are again spot-on, but seem repetitive of the above (“you spend hours unraveling the mysteries of complicated procedures, routines, or systems”), and some really make you question if this trait is really a “strength” (“Chances are good that you rely on your passion for reading to help you launch conversations. Engaging in small talk or casual chitchat is likely to be difficult for you.”).
5. Maximizer – new. This theme is focused on seeking out strengths, either individually or as a team, and employing them to their best advantage, in order to create Excellence. I want to be the best, and seek perfection by finding ways to make my strengths the foundation of my work, and want to be appreciated for my strengths, and see no point in working on overcoming my weaknesses. Except, that’s not true at all. While I do focus on my strengths and how to best utilize and develop them in every situation, and choose projects that align with my strengths (obviously, I read this book and took the quiz twice), I do also keep note of my weaknesses and try to work on those as well. I’m best at jumping into new projects and love the work where I’m learning and exploring, but I’m not so great at finishing, and I’m actively working on learning how to end a project – when to hand off final tasks, how to conduct a post-mortem, and discussing lessons learned – before jumping into the next exciting thing. I’m also learning how to delegate – something I fail miserably at and actually contradicts all of my strengths because obviously I want to do the work myself, even when I overestimate my capacity to do so. And to top it off, I’m not only working on those two weaknesses, but I asked for help in doing so – another major weakness of mine. However, I don’t look at these weaknesses as any sort of failure or shortcoming, just things that can make me stronger. I don’t think that’s a bad thing or “minimizes” my work.
So, there ya have it. Very different list of strengths, despite the idea that they don’t change. But doesn’t this make sense? I first took the quiz as I was just starting my career – I was young, naïve of corporate politics, and thought I was invincible. The economy was booming and I was a cocky, super-smart, talented young thing who was going to conquer the world, despite having no practical experience in anything other than reading and writing, and a talent for arguing.
Now, nearly two decades later, my career has been sent in a million different directions due to two major recessions, a hard turn back to academics (law school) after the housing bust, and the impact of becoming aware of the realities of the world we live in. Just working hard and knowing stuff doesn’t matter. If you’re a non-Italian non-male wanting to work in the contracting world, “maybe you should try real estate.” (Um, sir, thanks for skirting the edge of what you can and can't say in an interview.) And once you find a job in a completely different industry that seems like a perfect fit – lots of work reading, writing, negotiating, and learning new information all the time! – you realize the idea of a “promotion if you work harder and take on more responsibility” is a smokescreen, because the only people getting promoted are friends with someone on the hiring committee, and there aren’t going to be any availabilities in your department, no matter how indispensable you become.
So, what are your options? You need to focus on your transferable skills and begin considering a transfer somewhere that might at least offer a path for promotion and more money. And what are those transferable skills? Well, let’s start with Strengths – the inherent traits I carry with me that I can utilize to my benefit and to my employer’s benefit.
It is kind of funny that this is what got me to this point, since my dominant trait is Strategic, and my primary Strength Domain (new since 2006) is Strategic Thinking – focused primarily on absorbing and analyzing data to make better decisions. The book says Strategic Thinkers should be put in charge of the whole organization because we see the big picture, cut through the bull, and make sound decisions based on factual information. Based on all of my strengths, both old (2006) and new (2023), my Strength Domain paired with (apparently) a talent for Maximizing the strengths of myself and those on my team, and my analysis of all of the above, I feel like I have had an important epiphany about my career:
Clearly someone should hire me ASAP as their CEO and get me one of those one-percenter salaries and a golden parachute, because damn, this girl’s tired AF.
June 21, 2025
به نظرم هدیه خوبی برای تمام مدیران و کارمندانه
Read
February 6, 2025I really enjoyed Discover Your Strengths by Don Clifton because it clearly and concisely describes each characteristic, making it easy to recognize yourself in some of them. The book encourages you to focus on your strengths, whether in your career or different areas of your life. The key takeaway is to embrace your positive traits and use them as your power, which is a refreshing and empowering perspective.
February 13, 2025
This book shifts the focus from fixing weaknesses to maximizing strengths, offering a fresh perspective on self-improvement. The StrengthsFinder assessment provides personalized insights, making it a practical tool for career and life development. Highly recommended for anyone looking to leverage their natural talents!
November 8, 2015
I liked the book ok. I happened to have a copy with a valid test code, so I took it for free. My top five turned out to be: Learner, Realtor, Futuristic, Restorative, Discipline.
I must say, the research seems intriguing, but I ended up feeling confused about managing my strengths in the end.
The authors definitely spent more energy and polishing the "analysis" part of the research. I can see that it's backed by some data and therefore the descriptions of strengths and examples of personalities read very convincing.
The second - "synthesis" part feels weaker in comparison. Some recommendations how to grow your own strengths could be drawn from manager's one-pagers "how to manage a person strong in X", but they seem to be very generic and less impressive. It seems that they were "made up" by qualitative research (if any) and not backed up by data.
Same goes for the recommendations about how to build a strength-focused company. Some good advice, but I could not help but feel that it is too shallow and abrupt. It seemed more like a "coaching" advice and not a clear framework which could be used by HR department to go out and implement it. Although I do see that some of the recommendations are being used in today's corporations - broad role salary bands, clearly defined performance objectives, regular one-on-ones with managers etc.
Also, authors compare their test to "industry placement" career tests and claim that Strength test does not peg a person into any field while standard career tests do. This is kind of BS. Modern personality tests rarely place a person into a field, they provide examples of some fields at most. And then authors proceed with effectively recommendation of pegging "strength profiles" into employment "roles". So they say, "hey, we don't place you into industry, just role" as if it is not correlated with industry in any way. In retail the most common role would be "Sales person", in technology it will be "Engineer" so this whole "we are not like others, we are better" claim is kind of ridiculous.
So here it is. I think this book (and test) is useful to introspect your own strengths, but then it leaves you hanging there. The rest of the story reads as poorly formalized recommendations which authors scrambled out of their personal opinions and conclusions to sell their coaching services to corporations. It still has value, but it will take a lot of effort (and trial and error) for a CEO or HR person to work through it and come up with a real plan. Perhaps once authors collect enough data on the companies they helped, they can produce a better book with the real recommendations to both companies and individuals...
I must say, the research seems intriguing, but I ended up feeling confused about managing my strengths in the end.
The authors definitely spent more energy and polishing the "analysis" part of the research. I can see that it's backed by some data and therefore the descriptions of strengths and examples of personalities read very convincing.
The second - "synthesis" part feels weaker in comparison. Some recommendations how to grow your own strengths could be drawn from manager's one-pagers "how to manage a person strong in X", but they seem to be very generic and less impressive. It seems that they were "made up" by qualitative research (if any) and not backed up by data.
Same goes for the recommendations about how to build a strength-focused company. Some good advice, but I could not help but feel that it is too shallow and abrupt. It seemed more like a "coaching" advice and not a clear framework which could be used by HR department to go out and implement it. Although I do see that some of the recommendations are being used in today's corporations - broad role salary bands, clearly defined performance objectives, regular one-on-ones with managers etc.
Also, authors compare their test to "industry placement" career tests and claim that Strength test does not peg a person into any field while standard career tests do. This is kind of BS. Modern personality tests rarely place a person into a field, they provide examples of some fields at most. And then authors proceed with effectively recommendation of pegging "strength profiles" into employment "roles". So they say, "hey, we don't place you into industry, just role" as if it is not correlated with industry in any way. In retail the most common role would be "Sales person", in technology it will be "Engineer" so this whole "we are not like others, we are better" claim is kind of ridiculous.
So here it is. I think this book (and test) is useful to introspect your own strengths, but then it leaves you hanging there. The rest of the story reads as poorly formalized recommendations which authors scrambled out of their personal opinions and conclusions to sell their coaching services to corporations. It still has value, but it will take a lot of effort (and trial and error) for a CEO or HR person to work through it and come up with a real plan. Perhaps once authors collect enough data on the companies they helped, they can produce a better book with the real recommendations to both companies and individuals...
Displaying 1 - 30 of 730 reviews