What do you think?
Rate this book
Ecclesiastical Hierarchy
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Dionysius the Areopagite was a judge of the Areopagus who, as related in the Acts of the Apostles, (Acts 17:34), was converted to Christianity by the preaching of the Apostle Paul during the Areopagus sermon. According to Dionysius of Corinth, quoted by Eusebius, this Dionysius then became the second Bishop of Athens.
Dionysius the Areopagite was a judge of the Areopagus who, as related in the Acts of the Apostles, (Acts 17:34), was converted to Christianity by the preaching of the Apostle Paul during the Areopagus sermon. According to Dionysius of Corinth, quoted by Eusebius, this Dionysius then became the second Bishop of Athens.
- GenresTheology
42 pages, Paperback
3 people are currently reading
20 people want to read
About the author
Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite
60 books82 followersAlso known as Pseudo-Denys, was a Christian theologian and philosopher of the Neoplatonist school during the late 5th to early 6th century.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
December 31, 2021
First of all, you have to love this guy's name. Yes, I know that the "pseudo" just refers to misattribution of later Neoplatonic writing to one of the early church fathers, but I also love that a Christian religious leader is named after the Greek god of wine with the further reference to the Areopagus, which feels very pagan to me.
A lot of this work is obscurely written and filled with theological gobbledygook. Did he just pull this stuff out of the air? Or is it built on church traditions? Or his personal mystical experiences? Or what? Maybe it doesn't matter and maybe any sort of attempt to make much of it rational misses the point. I did get a sense in reading this of a deep mystical connection to the divinity. The process of cleansing and initiation accompanied by obscure formal rites that can open the way to God for the prepared seeker felt promising to me. For the person with the right frame of mind, elaborate ritual can have great meaning, even if it based on nothing more than a need to set the right mood for a person who is ready to receive it. I could see this as a path to spiritual enlightenment, a path that would be better for me than the self-inflicted suffering advocated by John of the Cross. And it is certainly more attractive as a religious path than the go-to-Sunday-School/sing-hymns/hear-the-sermon Protestant Christianity that I was brought up on.
A lot of this work is obscurely written and filled with theological gobbledygook. Did he just pull this stuff out of the air? Or is it built on church traditions? Or his personal mystical experiences? Or what? Maybe it doesn't matter and maybe any sort of attempt to make much of it rational misses the point. I did get a sense in reading this of a deep mystical connection to the divinity. The process of cleansing and initiation accompanied by obscure formal rites that can open the way to God for the prepared seeker felt promising to me. For the person with the right frame of mind, elaborate ritual can have great meaning, even if it based on nothing more than a need to set the right mood for a person who is ready to receive it. I could see this as a path to spiritual enlightenment, a path that would be better for me than the self-inflicted suffering advocated by John of the Cross. And it is certainly more attractive as a religious path than the go-to-Sunday-School/sing-hymns/hear-the-sermon Protestant Christianity that I was brought up on.
Displaying 1 of 1 review