I initially decided to read this book to gain inspiration. I also have a nonspeaking, autistic son like Jamie. I had never heard of facilitated communication (FC) or S2C prior to reading this book. My son uses augmented communication using LAMP software to communicate his wants and needs, so I was interested in seeing if S2C would work even better than what he uses now. I wondered if it would provide insight into what my son thinks, why he gets frustrated, what makes him scared or happy, etc. I decided to do some independent research on FC and S2C whilst reading the book to help me further consider whether these methods would work for my son. I really wish I had not stained my perception of Jamie's story with what I found in my research, which one could do for themselves (but the results are not promising at all). I also watched a Frontline documentary on FC and both the documentary and what I read online shows that this type of therapy or communication method is essentially bogus; the words coming from those who are nonspeaking are influenced by the facilitator. I would like to say that I do think that in few instanced there ARE those who benefit from FC (maybe Jamie is one of them?), but more often than not, it appears that FC is phony. This was disheartening to say the least. I would like to believe that Jamie's words are truly his, and not the influence of his facilitators. After discovering all of this, I found myself reading this book as a skeptic, and not as someone seeking inspiration. I also found a few things troubling with the story. How can "DM" diagnose Jamie with "ocular apraxia"? Is she an ophthalmologist or eye specialist, or was this just her own unfounded opinion? Would a person with autistic truly refer to themselves as "retarded", as Jamie referred to himself when his dad asked him how his teacher treated him? Overall, I will say that I finished the book with skepticism. I guess I'm one of those who has to see it to believe it.