This book is meant to be a deeply moving and to help its readers come to a deeper understanding of themselves as humans, what it means to be human, and the ways in which humans are ultimately the same in spite of our differences. In addition, it also seeks to encourage our feeling of connectedness to the world and the greater cosmos.
I fully enjoyed the pictorial dimension of the book. It is engaging and beautiful. It is in no way life altering, radical, groundbreaking, or transformative. However, not every children's book needs to be. The images match the wording, embody the message and tone of the writing, and my children liked looking at them. They did their job well.
Personally, the writing of Susan Verde's book that did not do anything for me. I get the message the book is trying to deliver. Regardless of whether or not I "approve" of the message, I think the writing is wooden, stilted, and not at pretty or as deep as it pretends to be. At best it comes off as didactic and lecturing. At worst, it gives the book a nearly arrogant tone, in spite of the fact that it is trying to deliver a message which is very much the opposite of that. That gives the reading an almost lopsided or even contradictory feelings.
On a more personal note, I am not the biggest fan of books which suggest the beauty and perfect of all things. The field of children's literature is replete with these sorts of books. Once in a while they are nice and serve a purpose. However, one of the many purposes of literature is to teach. What concerns me about these books is that they suggest the world is perfect, we are perfect, and all things are well. I don't mind a book that says the world "should" be that way. It should. I do mind books that suggest the world is this way. It is not. For this reason, I prefer reading books to my kids that have an evil witch or a Lord Voldemort in them. The world is full of dragons and I think it is unhelpful to suggest otherwise.
That last bit is just a personal pet peeve of mine and I don't detract stars from books for failing to meet my own personal mores. I gave this book three stars primarily because of that didactic (possibly arrogant) tone I mentioned earlier.