I can’t figure out why it won’t let me change the finish date to the 25th, when I finished it this - well, yesterday evening and forgot to mark it finished. I’ve corrected this problem before and it hasn’t remained fixed on the day after (even if I go to settings now for “activity on start/end book”, it shows the 25th but won’t allow that to be visible to the public). Anyone reading this that can help me? Lol... seriously though.
ONTO THE GOOD STUFF.
I was going to do the review later but I believe it ^shouldn’t be* too long, so I’ll just go for it now (watch it be as loquacious as ever). This was, for all intents and purposes, a fantastic historical fiction novel.
Made even better by my love for Coco Chanel, which first started when I was 14. I got my first Chanel bag in 2005 and have adored the House of Chanel and the legacy of Gabrielle, with her resolve, her elegance and the absolute timelessness of her pieces, for what feels like forever.
I always remembered finding it so odd that so many other girls my age (and even as we got older) blanched at Chanel, not understanding my love for not just the “status symbol”, but all of the fascinating back stories and history that came from the namesake’s life. What I saw as elegant, classy, timeless... they simply referred to as “it looks too much like something an old lady would carry.” OK? I’d always loved Chanel because I thought it transcended so many of those barriers - 16 or 76, who wouldn’t look good with a Chanel on their shoulder?
Of course, when Chanel became “the” brand of ultimate status (the only one that seems to be able to increasingly raise its prices every few years and not only NOT lose customers, but attract even more by doing so) all of a sudden every girl I knew that had denounced or been dismissive of Chanel suddenly did a 180. I don’t know, something about that rubs me the wrong way. It’s a status symbol of course, and to say the name doesn’t matter... well, I can’t imagine anyone saying this truthfully. But I feel like with so much history attached to it and such incredible stories, people should at least be familiar with these of the couture houses they proclaim to favor.
Would the rumors (and by some people’s beliefs, not rumors but facts) that Coco Chanel held many anti-Semitic views and - the established fact, that she lived in the finest accommodations along with the Nazi high command and even had a Nazi lover for 4 years (Spatz) deter people from the brand? Maybe, but they’ll likely never do their history on her fascinating life.
I must admit, even though I did know some of the facts already (her living at the Ritz and largely willfully ignorant of the tyranny occurring just out of her perfect world, as well as the fact that Boy Capel was the inspiration for the now classic 2011 Boy bag) some were excitingly new for me.
I can’t really understand that some reviewers had ZERO sympathy for her. Especially women! Think about how hard it is to prove yourself and earn your own money and be able to proudly state so, even in today’s world. Then imagine in the 20s and 30s, when her star was rising, she goes from being an impoverished orphan child to a young adult woman who is treated well and spoiled rotten by extremely wealthy and powerful men (but with no real freedom of her own) to becoming one of the world’s most well-known names in fashion and the most elite social circles? One of the earliest known rags-to-riches tales, a self-made millionaire, who never again has to rely on a man (when so many have betrayed her especially) for her self-worth, her freedom, security?
It must have been a wonderful feeling that everyone craves someday. She invented #5, and it was her name, elegance, and mystique that helped establish it as a classic, and she herself, as a force to be reckoned with. So imagine you’ve gone through all of this, only to be served a letter telling you that it’s all going to be taken away from you?
And it’s not as if Pierre did this because he was a desperate Jew in occupied France, trying to barter for his life! He was worth millions when they met and he invested in her perfume, a perfume conglomerate. If he sold the product and the majority shares to Chanel, he’d become a little less wealthier - but still wealthy beyond most people’s wildest dreams. But if Chanel lost it? She’d go back to a life of poverty, forced to appease and seduce men she didn’t love, just for a hopeful shot at long term security. After so long of being free and independent from that horrible feeling of putting one’s life in the hands of another.
So I can’t exactly blame her for the tactics she may or may not have tried. Also, even while she may not be the most likeable character on the planet, I loved her sheer grit, perseverance, her resilience: Her ability to place logic over emotion when it came to self-preservation. And if people freak out about her spying for the Reich... really? She wasn’t giving out names of her Jewish friends to then have them picked up and delivered to concentration camps. She was trying to seek info from influential Spanish military men like General Francisco Franco and what his opinion may be on an official war alliance with Germany. And at first she says no to the mission, that she will not betray her county in this way.
But then the Nazis confront her with the knowledge that they know Andre is her son, not her nephew as she’s pretended all these years - and worse, he was captured as a POW and is very sick with tuberculosis at a bad POW camp. Their implications were very clear: not only do perform your mission, but you must succeed, bring us results that are useful, or your son will not leave the camp. This meaning he will certainly die in agony, as he needs immediate hospitalization and good care from the best doctors for a chance to live. Women who are mothers are judging her for something she agreed to only on the condition of her son’s release and subsequent hospital care? Ok...isn’t it often said that you have no idea what you may be capable of until you’re a mother, and until you have to make choices that could result in life or death consequences for your child? Yeah.. really don’t want to hear it when it came to saving her son’s life.
I just thought it was bad ass when she stumbled upon an operation gone wrong, and she was bold enough to blackmail the men working directly under Heinrich Himmler!! I don’t fault her for living well under the German occupation. Should she have distributed her money equally among communities in France for them to have one meal that changed nothing in the long run? Should she have left the Ritz, which had been her home LONG before the Nazis took up residence there, and lived in a ramshackle apartment with minimal rations?
I mean, people do what they can to get by, survive, or live the best they can in whatever environment they’re in. And I believe that’s simply all she was doing. Could she come across as ignorant and judgmental at times? Of course. But I fail to believe she was inherently evil.
As interesting as the new info was that I discovered in this book, I guess maybe two things just made me give it a 3 star rating (rounded up to a 3.5, really). One - I already a lot of the history and two - it just was told rather flatly. Maybe there wasn’t a more exciting way to tell it. I don’t know. But Chanel lived such an exciting life, that it doesn’t seem possible that this life couldn’t have been told in a more thrilling, fast-paced style.
She’s a role model to women in so many ways: with her excellent business sense, creative style, and her unwillingness to accept defeat. For she is Coco Chanel, and while the French may have held a grudge for a bit too long, her name was revived and beloved in America before the French forgave her. And long after she passed, her name continues to dominate the high fashion world of couture. For Coco Chanel IS fashion, and she is eternal.