It took me a while to piece together. I’d read some Manly Wellman before (his survivor of Atlantis tales) and here the text was enjoyable but different - it was not bereft of humor but less lost in mirth, yet replacing the humor was a sort of celebratory light quality - and then it struck. I’d read something once before with the same tone. This reminded me of stories of Robin Hood.
I was reading the story of a folk hero.
And that is just what we have here, with an expertly narrated take that is instantly enjoyable populated with interesting people from the past adrift in desert sands and struggles from long ago.
Regarding the prose: it’s surprisingly bare bones and consise, which I usually don’t like as I feel like that’s lazy and boring prose, but there is just enough allusions and symbolism and word play put in to keep it interesting and engaging. Further, often there are words behind the words - a quiet energy that I found charming. So while this is no Robert Howard, it is strong enough to keep me reading and enjoying.
Central to the story is of course the
Cahena - woman and prophetess and warrior, love interest and the stories symbol, perceived and regarded by Wulf and the others as something enchanting. As with the prose, there is a simple kind energy to the characters and the interactions thereof, there in the interactions of the camp followers I felt like I was in a scouts camp with its teasing, playful energies. This fit in perfectly with the celebratory, pagentary ways of a folk hero tale. The writer does a good job of pointing out the dichotomy to her character: though she is presented as some sort of warrior, she looks young in the moonlight to Wulf, and her boots are small, saying a lot with a little here.
I really liked the cultural and mythological bits that were sprinkled here and there; i.e. Talk of Khro, the bull headed being that selects who is fated to die before each battle, camp scenes set about old dusty tombs, etc. That sort of thing. Like most I was not familiar with the culture introduced here, so its promise was exciting and engaging.
As with Wellman’s other works, there are occasionally good philosophical/sociological asides, such as this tid bit:
“What happened to gods when their people perished, or turned away after other faiths? Did gods die then? What happened to the gods of Greece and Rome, of Babylon and Canaan, what about the three hundred and sixty grotesque idols at Mecca, one for every day of the Arabian year, before Mohammad cast them out? It might be unchancy to be a god when worship stopped, when prayers were chanted no more, when the odor of incense, of sacrificial blood died out of the air before the alter. In Wulf’s England the church was strong, but here and there the people still built the Beltane fires, stayed awake all night to welcome midsummer, trembled in fear of the spirits out and wandering on tte eve of All Hallows. And what about here, with the Imazighan bowing to gods of all sorts? How long could those gods live and prevail?”
However, as I continued to read, I started to grow bored. The prose - while flecked with brief shimmering imagery - was usually too tame and simple. The love scenes didn’t interest me. The fighting and campaigning was interesting enough as was some of the landscape and some of the characters and I kind of liked the almost arrogantly direct diologues … but it wasn’t enough. My attention was slipping.
*spoilers*
And then came the matter of Khalid, bringing new social elements and under texts and I was suddenly interested again as new questions rose. Was the Cahena really a folk hero figure? Was she even good? Were the voices that spoke to her? And what about Khro and the other characters - what was her relationship with Khro? What was her relationship with Bhakrann? The text was good about not over staying there, but suddenly, like some strange puzzle of a ghastly image, it was forming.
*MEGA S P O I L E R S *
***********************************
“‘What you mean is to leave them no loot,’ said Daris at last.
‘That’s just what he means,’ declared the Cahena. ‘Level our towns, lay our fields to waste, leave nothing. We can do it ..’”
Yup, at this point I was pretty certain of my interpretation of the Cahena, the sorceress. I think it was done subtly enough that it’s open to interpretation, but that’s how I read it at least.
Of course, this revelation is soon followed by another key scene:
“She leaned closer, as once she had leaned to him in the days before Khalid came.
‘Love,’ she said softly. ‘You’ve said that you loved me. Shouldn’t love make us wise, make us sensible?’
He did not lean back to her. He frowned silently for a moment. The Lamia, too, had spoken of love, had offered it. At last he said: ‘I don’t agree that love does that. When you’re in love you need to be wise and sensible, but it doesn’t work like that. Love confuses you. You’re blinded by lightning flashes, you’re deafened by rolling thunder. Your blood races, your heart beats like a drum, you believe dreams and not realities. You’re not rational.’
She was quickly on her feet, and so was he. Her splendid eyes glittered fiercely.
‘You’re irritating,’ she said between set teeth.
‘You asked me a question about love and I answered it as well as I could.’
She motioned at the door. ‘Perhaps you’d better go.’”
Wow. Lots of imagery and symbology there. The sphinx all over again and the Lamia; it is interesting to note the Cahena’s teeth are briefly focused on, which was also a narrative focal point for the sharp teeth of the Lamia, thereby drawing a symbological bond once more between the two figures.
********************************
**** end spoilers somewhat *****
In the end, of course, there are many interpretations of the story and its characters. Tone and sympathies certainly shift back and forth and despite the magic and the ancient times we are left with a human story and a love story of sorts. In the end we are left with a story of Wulf and the Cahena perhaps best encapsulated thus:
“‘Pray?’ she repeated. ‘To what gods? The gods don’t answer prayers anymore.’
Wulf said nothing, but he felt that she spoke the truth. He himself would put no reliance in any god he had heard of. He’d trust only in himself, Wulf the Saxon, prone to error, limited in vision, but himself. All he had to trust.”
It’s a hard story to rate. The ending is really *spoilers again * bitter and sad I thought. *end spoiler.* But it’s a human ending, and sometimes sword and sorcery, dark fantasy, and other tales of violence and brutality present the human experience best … life can be that way sometimes, like a brittle breath lost in the breeze. That said, I can’t give this story a 5….I don’t think I can really give it a 4. But three out of five Death gods? Well, that sounds about right.