Offering an in-depth coverage of economic ideas from ancient times to the present, this outstanding text delivers today's student powerful insight into the broad scope of past intellectual contributions to the evolution of contemporary economic thinking. Notably shying from a mind-numbing encyclopedic listing of isolated people and dusty ideas, the authors provide engaging discourse of both the ideas which have shaped contemporary economic theory and the different methods used for problem solving. The result is a wonderfully sound and inviting history.
La verdad es que me gustó mucho. Lo tuve que leer para la universidad y no sentí en ningún momento que fuera un trabajo. Vienen muchos autores, los principales de la historia, y están bien explicados.
Informative, but highly normative and dare I say, Whiggist in its economic thinking. Example? Aside from declaring that progressive taxation is ridiculous at one point, the authors have 3 pages of caveats for Keynes' importance and heap nothing but praise on Friedman. But it's an excellent timeline.
🇬🇧 A fairly faithful and accurate summary of the main economic theories.
The author focuses on the most influential ones to give them a more detailed explanation than some heterodox ones that lack relevance in dominant orthodoxy. There are many theories that I would have liked to read more in detail and relevant historical points. I also find some discrepancies with the author regarding ideological positions, which make him make some judgments that in my view are wrong.
🇪🇸 Un resumen bastante fiel y acertado de las principales teorías económicas.
El autor se enfoca en las más influyentes para darles una explicación más detalladas que algunas heterodoxas que carecen de relevancia en la ortodoxia dominante. Hay muchas teorías que me hubieran gustado leer más a detalle y puntos históricos relevantes. También encuentro algunas discrepancias con el autor con respecto a posiciones ideológicas, que lo hacen emitir algunos juicios que a mi vista están errados.
I managed to get through a huge chunk of this book (maybe 75-80%). Ekelund and Hebert provide a good overview of the general history of economics with a focus on economic theory and method instead of historical facts and events (as the title suggests). Overall, the book was informative though definitely with a more mainstream bent than I'd prefer. I'd recommend this book for a cursory study of history of econ, but for some of the more nitty gritty stuff, I'd look elsewhere. This book would probably be useful as a jumping point for further research, especially with the extensive list of references in the Notes on Further Reading section after each chapter.
This book has definitely helped me fill in the holes in my general history of econ knowledge, so I'm glad I read it.
One of the main references for Econ 109: History of Economic Doctrines under Prof. Emmanuel De Dios (UP), Second Semester 1997-98, UP School of Economics, Diliman.