What do you think?


Logic and Philosophy: A Modern Introduction
This text is designed for instructors who want a complete set of rules for first order predicate (Quantifier) logic, with identity, and a good range of other material. The authors approach through all of the editions has made this text the easiest for students to learn from among modern symbolic texts.
496 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1969
About the author
Howard Kahane
23 books8 followersHoward Kahane (19 April 1928 – 2 May 2001) was a professor of philosophy at Bernard M. Baruch College in New York City. He was noted for promoting a popular, and non-mathematical, approach to logic, now known as informal logic. His best known publication in that area is his textbook Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life. Another textbook of his that saw posthumous publication is Logic and Philosophy: A Modern Introduction.
Kahane graduated with a BA (1954) and master's degree (1958) from the University of California at Los Angeles, and received a Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania in 1962. Before Baruch College, Kahane taught at Whitman College, the University of Kansas, American University and the University of Maryland at Baltimore.
Kahane graduated with a BA (1954) and master's degree (1958) from the University of California at Los Angeles, and received a Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania in 1962. Before Baruch College, Kahane taught at Whitman College, the University of Kansas, American University and the University of Maryland at Baltimore.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
April 9, 2008
This was the best intro textbook that I encountered during the time that I taught introductory symbolic logic. If I were to teach logic again, I would definitely look at the latest edition of this text.
The advantage over other intro symbolic logic texts is that it requires students to understand what they are doing in order to do proofs. (The previous textbook I used, not one that I chose but one that I was required to teach from, only taught students to crank through proofs and did not emphasize the ideas at all.)
The advantage over other intro symbolic logic texts is that it requires students to understand what they are doing in order to do proofs. (The previous textbook I used, not one that I chose but one that I was required to teach from, only taught students to crank through proofs and did not emphasize the ideas at all.)
April 13, 2010
After taking a college intro course in logic I was eager to learn more. This book was a wonderful introduction to symbolic logic, and I was able to get through most of the sentential logic section (first half of the book) over break. It's full of exercises, and it explains how to do things step by step. If you want to study symbolic logic on your own, then I recommend this book.
June 22, 2011
This was the textbook for the one and only course I was assigned to teach while a T.A. at Loyola University Chicago. Comments about that are included in the review of the Instructor's Manual for Logic and Philosophy. About this particular introductory text I have no particular feelings. Naturally, I preferred the Tapscott text used when, a couple of years prior, I was introducted to symbolic logic.
April 21, 2026
do not take a logic class "for fun".
June 20, 2026
Nu fattar jag bestämda beskrivningar rent formellt… värt det
21 åringen som bor på (adress på Fårö) har lagt ner för mycket tid på den här boken:
(∃x){[(Px∧Gx)∧Bxa]∧(∀y){[(Py∧Gy)∧Bya]→(x=y)}∧Lxb}
Okej men hur översätter man propositionen ovan till mängdlära?? … 😟🔫
21 åringen som bor på (adress på Fårö) har lagt ner för mycket tid på den här boken:
(∃x){[(Px∧Gx)∧Bxa]∧(∀y){[(Py∧Gy)∧Bya]→(x=y)}∧Lxb}
Okej men hur översätter man propositionen ovan till mängdlära?? … 😟🔫
December 11, 2011
This book was most helpful to me learning symbolic logic. The explanations and examples are pretty clear compared to most other logic books.
December 16, 2012
it was a nice book for the course. easy to read. truly made the concepts easy to understand. without it, i dont think i would have gotten the grade i did in Logic.
June 28, 2021
I bought this some while ago. An old girlfriend who was more into mathematical logic was more the inspiration behind me getting this.
In progress
Contents
Preface
Chapter One:Introduction
1. The Elements of an Argument - 1
2. Deduction and Induction - 4
3. Argument Forms - 6
4. Truth and Validity - 8
5. Soundness - 11
6. Consistency - 11
7. Consistency and Validity Compared - 12
8. Contexts of Discovery and Justification - 14
Key Terms - 15
Chapter Two: Truth-Functions - Page 16
1. Atomic and Compound Sentences - 16
2. Truth-Functions - 17
3. Conjunctions - 18
4. Variables and Constants - 20
5. Negations - 21
6. Parentheses and Brackets - 23
7. Disjunctions - 24
8. "Not Both" and "Neither...Nor" - 27
9. Material Conditionals - 29
10. Material Biconditionals - 31
11. "Only If" and "Unless" - 33
12. Symbolizing Complex Sentences - 35
Key Terms - 41
Chapter Three: Truth Tables - Page 43
1. Computing Truth-Values - 43
2. Tautologies, Contradictions, and Contingent Sentences - 48
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
Chapter Four: Proofs
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Chapter Five: Conditional and Indirect Proofs - 108
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8
In progress
Contents
Preface
Chapter One:Introduction
1. The Elements of an Argument - 1
2. Deduction and Induction - 4
3. Argument Forms - 6
4. Truth and Validity - 8
5. Soundness - 11
6. Consistency - 11
7. Consistency and Validity Compared - 12
8. Contexts of Discovery and Justification - 14
Key Terms - 15
Chapter Two: Truth-Functions - Page 16
1. Atomic and Compound Sentences - 16
2. Truth-Functions - 17
3. Conjunctions - 18
4. Variables and Constants - 20
5. Negations - 21
6. Parentheses and Brackets - 23
7. Disjunctions - 24
8. "Not Both" and "Neither...Nor" - 27
9. Material Conditionals - 29
10. Material Biconditionals - 31
11. "Only If" and "Unless" - 33
12. Symbolizing Complex Sentences - 35
Key Terms - 41
Chapter Three: Truth Tables - Page 43
1. Computing Truth-Values - 43
2. Tautologies, Contradictions, and Contingent Sentences - 48
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
Chapter Four: Proofs
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Chapter Five: Conditional and Indirect Proofs - 108
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8
Read
January 21, 2020ths
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews








