“To me, if we never got further than this, it would be heaven.”
Reverend Jim Jones sat on his throne at the pavilion before a thousand or so displaced people – people he had lured away from their homes and families to live in a dense, predator-infested Guyanese jungle which he had told them was “Paradise.” The swath torn out of the thick brush and trees was done by the members of Jones' People's Temple movement, primarily a group of people not accustomed to such labours. In fact, they had moved from Indiana and California in search of a better life, of some peace and racial tolerance.
But by 1978, they were harassed, harangued, and almost entirely beaten down by their leader, whom some saw as God himself. Jim Jones could, after all, “cure” cancers of all sorts, physical disabilities that had baffled the medical community, and cause the blind to see once again. Jones was a hard man to know, and his behaviours often seemed incongruous for one who was so godlike – but he was the charismatic leader of so many who had felt unloved, unlucky... who could feel comfortable in openly questioning the will of God?
It was the lack of candid exposure which had helped boost Jones to his highest levels. Without the validation of other people's fears being expressed, lone souls held their tongues, thus perpetuating the cycle. Too, a free exchange of ideas was encouraged only during specific times during Church meetings: during so-called catharsis sessions. Members – the loyal “inner circle” of Jones' aides, assistants, and family included – were required to step up and publicly criticize specific persons, often to the point of gross exaggeration or even outright fabrication. Criminal activities were announced, suspicious behaviours revealed, and sexual proclivities discussed. Of course, the one being verbally eviscerated was often unable to disprove the allegations, and was therefore cajoled into acceptance, else risk the wrath of Father Jones and his people.
For its brilliant and peaceable socialistic exterior, with free homes for member senior citizens and schooling for the Temple children, the People's Temple amounted into organized bullying. Jim Jones effectively became a god to his people because of his master deception, and manipulation.
Raven: The Untold Story of the Rev. Jim Jones and His People delves far beyond any of the television docudramas, or the films, or the rushed-to-publication books regarding the People's Temple in the day. Author Tim Reiterman was not only a journalist deeply involved in the People's Temple story – he was shot and wounded along with several others when visiting congressman Leo Ryan (along with four others, all unarmed, primarily members of the press) was assassinated by Jonestown residents. Reiterman saw first hand many of the things that the majority of visitors to Jonestown did not live to reveal. He was one of the handful of people who got away on that last day, when Jones ordered the deaths of so many unprotected innocents.
The book, at over 600 pages, begins with the circumstances of Jones' birth and childhood, looking at his familial relations between his outspoken mother Lynetta and his war-weakened father, James Thurber Jones. Jones' introduction to the Pentecostal Church, along with his juvenile attempts to take charge of his peers through religious ceremony and indoctrination, through to his college years and introduction to lifelong wife Marceline – Reiterman provides his sources to back up all of his biographical information, right through to Jones birth in 1931. He also acknowledges any personal interpretation proffered from audio or visual records of Jones and the People's Temple (in particular, one surviving film document portraying a typical People's Temple gathering, complete with roiling “sermon” and healing session, is related to the reader as the images struck the author).
Raven is comprehensive, and provides much background information on some of the Church members themselves, both prominent and lesser-known. The People's Temple truly was a Church of all colours and ages, which included people from derelicts to doctors. So, how did a gathering of so many fall under the persuasion of what seemed to be an obvious madman? Reiterman, through virtue of his research and story-telling abilities, reveals this surprising element throughout the pages of his book without needing to explicitly provide a moral, or one-line answer. For a wondering world, the biography of the People's Temple is the answer.
The single most important aspect of Raven is that Reiterman never loses sight of his subjects' humanity. The people involved never become simply the infamous “913 bodies,” but a living group of individuals who had their personalities entirely removed and replaced with commands and dictation. People are introduced – by name and by background – and are treated with the dignity and respect which had been stripped from them during their too-short lives. Upon reading the final chapters of the book, though the reader understands what the final ending will be due to history itself, the tension created elicits a visceral reaction from the audience. A tragedy on such a tremendous scale suddenly becomes somewhat more tangible to one who had never experienced such a thing, and the horror becomes vivid and alive.
In this, the 2008 reissue of the 1981 book of the same name, the Epilogue reads a little awkwardly. Reiterman provides the reader with a number of updates on some of the surviving key players in the Jonestown tragedy which was (presumably) current as of the time of its original release, but one cannot help but be burdened somewhat by the fact that the information does not “feel” duly updated for a release some twenty-seven years later.
Though thick and dense with information, Raven does not drag nor burden a reader with superfluous information. It flows logically, and retains as much of a clear and open picture of Jim Jones and the People's Temple as possible, especially in light of the injuries sustained by the author, and the murder of his acquaintances by a handful of Temple fanatics. Most other books on the subject are predictable and weak by comparison.