I find that photography, like any other visual art form, is susceptible to trends and fads, and individual images are too often firmly dated in their era. But the pictures in this great book of lesbian photography from thirty-three photographers and published in 1996 (I'm guessing there's not a one in the bunch that wasn't shot on – gasp – film) are nearly each one a classic; nothing in them suggests the fashion of a time, or if one does, it can just as easily be interpreted as an intentional throwback.
Fortunately, the images are not only gorgeously composed and shot, but they're also downright hot as hell, even when making political, religious, or other types of statements. But I think the thing that really sets this collection apart is the amount of diversity within. Aside from the expected variations in style, composition, setting, and topic, the models themselves represent white, black, and Hispanic women (however, there are no Asian representatives that I can see), and include the butch, the femme, and the trans; every shape, size, and body type, a range of ages, the disabled; elegant, dressed-up fancy ladies and down-and-dirty rough dykes; sweeping panoramas and close-ups of body parts; orgies, couples, and solo gals; mainstream sex acts through not-so-common kinks; riffs on stereotypes and clichés, plus a few things you definitely haven't seen before.
The design of the book is great too: the accompanying text is in grey sidebars instead of interspersed with the images, which preserves a great flow to perusing the images if you're not really interested in the text your first pass through. It's an extra-large book, too – coffee-table-sized (although you should probably surreptitiously clear it off your coffee table if your parents suddenly drop by) – so you don't need to break out your loupe to appreciate the details. Also, it turns out that I have a doppelgänger, and she can be found within these pages, smiling as she is about to be kissed by an older tattooed woman. It's really the damndest thing how much she looks exactly like me (but in fact is not).
I've taken off one star for the aggregate of the following complaints:
• Although the paper is strong and glossy, the images might seem too grainy for the generation raised with 92 gazillion megapixels. Photography buffs of a certain age however, will likely weep with nostalgia.
• Nearly all the photographs are in black and white. I would have really enjoyed seeing some work in color from these photographers.
• Somewhat related to my complaint immediately previous is that too great a majority of the pictures have really high contrast due to very strong lighting, so cast shadows are usually quite delineated, and in rare instances, the images look like they were overexposed. (This is obviously just a function of my own personal taste – nothing more.)
A treat you'll treasure, except maybe if you're a gay man with absolutely no interest in photography.