Something to definitely remember, because the concept of empathy takes a more defined dimension: there are 3 classified types of empathy, it’s not just one concept in business literature. We have:
Cognitive Empathy (understanding another person’s perspective - so, the one most of us confuse with all-empathy :D ), Emotional Empathy (the ability to feel what someone else feels - so, the one we also had as the previous one, because we just assumed empathy means caring), and Empathic Concern (the ability to sense what another person needs from you - so, this is what you call someone that is smart, that understands you, but is missing the other 2 categories of empathy, which were the ones most of us thought were actual-empathy, so, I guess, this 3rd thing is not it, THE-empathy, but it's important for business-empathy) …but sure, let’s continue with the book:
“Cognitive empathy enables leaders to express themselves in meaningful ways to reports” - ok, got it! This book is not really-really empathetic in nature.
“Cognitive empathy requires leaders to think about feelings, not actually feel them” - great, so they can stay detached. Exactly what we want our empathetic leaders to be (business-pun intended).
From this book, I honestly felt the “scientific” approach to empathy (all this dissecting and patterning) was just making things seems even more cold-hearted. The (Harvard) business (Review) approach.
they can “fake it until they make it”, they say.
next: show compassion to get better results. ...because you really care…about…hopefully the employee’s financial and emotional welfare, not just your personal leader’s metrics.
…but, wait: “if you are more compassionate, (…) your employee will be more loyal to you” - such a tempting incentive…
next: forgive for _you_ to feel better. …yes, you should come first, always…you are a leader and have people depending on you? wait, should you care about others first? for real? nooo.
…at this point in the book I understood clearly, with this approach, I can’t help being sarcastic, this is just too cold for me to accept calling it _empathy_. Maybe if I say the word many more times it becomes the real deal...
More of “greatest” hits:
“Empathy allows you to read people: whom is supporting whom, (…) where is the resistance?”
“Sometimes the supporters are not supporters at all, they are smart, sneaky, idea killers” - so empathetically put (for the business).
“Power is very important (…) learning to read how the flow of power is moving and shifting can help you lead the meeting, and everything else” - …I thought this was about empathy…ok, we call it “empathy”. Let’s ask google to add this as a synonym to _power_, _control_ and _dominance_, and it will be ok.
“Empathy will help you understand how people are responding to _you_, as a leader” - yes, teach me to be “empathetic”.
“[if you are not empathetic] you will look like a fool” - I don’t want that, yes, I wish to have more “emotional _intelligence_” than that.
Chapter 7 - let me sell you my business (calling something “empathetic research” makes it be with that empathy thing, I promise)
Chapter 8 - “how Facebook uses empathy to keep user data safe” (I’m getting the popcorn, because this sounds like fiction…ok, they mention “consumer driven goals”, which means if they fail they loose users, ok, this is more real-reality)
CONCLUSION: business empathy is a different type of empathy, it’s “empathy”.
…oh, and i would call “preferential empathy” bias, yes, i would name it bias.
This is a good for business (unempathetic) book about empathy. The title makes it hypocritical, and I do not like that.