First things first. As the author himself states, he is not a qualified doctor nor a qualified nutritionist. He's just a few years into his courses! Yet somehow thinks he knows more than everyone else. And, whatever science they've applied, is simply wrong.
That is the serious failing of science itself. There are simply no hard rules to follow when it comes to nutrition. There are many schools of thought. There are so many studies, going way back. There's endless contradiction due to many factors; such as who's funding the research, the scientists dependence upon grants, the limitation of the design of the studies, the latest funding fads, the latest political fads, etc.
Basically the above should suffice, but to add that Mr Wolrich adds nothing new, has no special insight to share, just more opinion and belief... and of course... using intuition to choose which foods are most suitable for you. Funny how instantly intuition is developed, and with such accuracy.
Mr Wolrich dismisses all other fully qualified Doctors who have written on nutrition, written on integrating diet into health, who have decided to look deeper for themselves, to study the studies, and share their own research and results with the public. I'm not saying that some have not come to erroneous conclusions (Dr. Akins for instance), but we can't throw the baby out with the bathwater... simply because the bathwater is dirty.
Mr Wolrich talks of burning books; “Burn them all”. As I said above, why throw baby away, it's just the water that's dirty. Anyone who talks of burning books, especially "them all", is a danger and not just unto themselves. We've all seen where that mentality leads; with religions, with politics, with whatever form of organization. Dialogue moves us forward Mr Wolrich, not monologue.
That's what struck me early into Mr Wolrich's book, the twisted logic, and the authors sense of self righteousness. It reads more like he's starting a cult than giving unbiased, objective, and wholesome information.
Mr Wolrich did answer my question as to why a fully qualified Doctor cannot understand "nutritional science” though. As “biological science and nutritional science are different”, “it's a very different skill”. Oh, that clears everything up. And there I was, thinking scientific training is scientific training. You know like a trained musician can play any tune by following the score... maybe I was wrong... but then again.
The book title itself is a bit misleading, as is the way he exaggerates the use of the "food is medicine" cliché. "We eat food, not nutrients". Somewhat of a mixed message there as we eat for for the nutrients. “Oranges do not cure cancer”, he boldly states. I've never ever in over 50 years read an author state that. Although I have read up on the research into High Dose IV Vit-C and cancer. Perhaps that is another one of his confusions. Like his claim that aspartame is safe “even drinking 1,900 cans per day”. If you drunk that much water, you'd be soon be dead!
Basically the guy likes playing with words and attempting to convince others he's onto showing new. What he's written has been written, only so much more clearly and with greater understanding.