I do like Al Murray, and I very much enjoyed his two recent series, Why Does Everyone Hate The English? and Why Do The Brits Win Every War?. Although they were hilarious, these were both fascinating series and hugely informative.
Which is why, therefore, it pains me to have to say that towards the end of this book, I was finding it a bloody hard slog. I had to keep updating my progress just to encourage myself to keep going.
Reading that it was meant to be a kind of modern homage to the classic 1066 And All That by WC Sellar and RJ Yeatman, I was looking forward to reading The Last 100 Years...And All That: but oh, what a disappointment! For one thing, Al's humour is too heavy-handed - and for another, it's simply not funny. Comedian Matt Forde is quoted on the cover as saying, "I squealed laughing at this", but god knows why *anyone* would respond in that way.
Another celebrity tome that was written during lockdown, and it certainly felt like it: even Murray seems to have lost interest at certain points. I also wondered if he had a word count that he couldn't quite fill, which might partly explain why the 3 pages on Hitler consist of a one-page cartoon illustration and 2 pages where 99% of the text is the word 'Hitler' repeated over and over again. The same goes for footnotes about Churchill, and in both cases, the 'joke' doesn't take long to outstay its welcome. Another example is any mention of Tony Blair having the footnote 'IRAQ!'. In fact, the repetitive nature of the footnote contents as a whole meant I stopped reading them altogether in the later chapters.
Another major issue for me is that not only is this book disappointing, but its humour is often inappropriate, given some of the incidents featured. If the writing had been sufficiently funny, Murray might've got away with it: but it isn't, and he doesn't.
And yet paradoxically, the reason why this book merits 3 stars and not 2 or lower is that when Murray isn't trying to be jokey and just gets on with the history aspects, I found him to be an *excellent* communicator. He distils complicated situations into clear, easy to grasp points, his delivery of information is punchy and insightful, and I learnt a lot from it.
Maybe, if the book had acted as the companion to a TV series, it might've worked better: what feels clunky on the page might have felt far less so when delivered on screen. I can't help thinking that if a lot of the 'humour' had been toned down or removed altogether, this would've been a cracking little primer on modern history.